The article explores welfare and health practitioners’ representations of work practices and professional values underpinning their engagement with forced migrants within a polyfunctional health service in an Italian metropolitan city. It explores the integrated approach developed to cater for asylum seekers and beneficiaries of international protection’s specific needs. Building on interviews with health professionals and welfare workers, the article aims to critically discuss how concepts of care and responsibility are talked about and what kind of values underpin their work ethics. Humanitarian representations emerging from the narratives of health and welfare workers suggest that care and compassion are asymmetric and inherently racialised emotions and the use of vulnerability to depict service users can work to legitimise problematic practices as well as maintaining a focus on the compassionate saviours, whilst at the same time silencing people in need.
AlivertiA (2020) Benevolent policing? Vulnerability and the moral pains of border controls. The British Journal of Criminology60(5): 1117–1135.
2.
AmbrosiniM (2018) Irregular Immigration in Southern Europe: Actors, Dynamics and Governance. Cham: Palgrave.
3.
BarnettM (2012) International paternalism and humanitarian governance. Global Constitutionalism1(3): 485–521.
4.
BarnettMWeissTG (eds) (2008) Humanitarianism in Question: Politics, Power, Ethics. Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press.
5.
BazurliRCampomoriFCasulaM (2020) Shelter from the storm: Virtuous systems of urban asylum governance coping with Italy’s immigration crackdown. Politiche Sociali2: 201–224.
6.
BolzoniMGargiuloEManocchiM (2015) The social consequences of the denied access to housing for refugees in urban settings: The case of Turin, Italy. International Journal of Housing Policy15(4): 400–417.
7.
ButlerJGambettiZSabsayL (eds) (2016) Vulnerability in Resistance. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.
8.
CaponioTCappialiTM (2018) Italian migration policies in times of crisis: The policy gap reconsidered. South European Society and Politics23(1): 115–132.
9.
DattaKMcIlwaineCEvansY, et al. (2010) A migrant ethic of care? Negotiating care and caring among migrant workers in London’s low-pay economy. Feminist Review94(1): 93–116.
10.
DeanJ (2020) The Good Glow Charity and the Symbolic Power of Doing Good. Bristol: Policy Press.
11.
FassinD (2012) Humanitarian Reason: A Moral History of the Present. Berkeley: University of California Press.
12.
FisherBTrontoJC (1990) Toward a feminist theory of caring. In: AbelEKNelsonMK (eds) Circles of Care: Work and Identity in Women’s Lives. Albany: SUNY Press, pp. 35–62.
13.
FraserN (2013) Fortunes of Feminism: From State-Managed Capitalism to Neoliberal Crisis. London: Verso Books.
14.
GilliganC (1982) In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15.
HeldV (2005) The Ethics of Care: Personal, Political, and Global. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16.
IlcanSRygielK (2015) ‘Resiliency humanitarianism’: Responsibilizing refugees through humanitarian emergency governance in the camp. International Political Sociology9: 333–351.
17.
MaestriGMonforteP (2020) Who deserves compassion? The moral and emotional dilemmas of volunteering in the ‘refugee crisis’. Sociology54(5): 920–935.
18.
MesaricAVacchelliE (2021) Invoking vulnerability: practitioner attitudes to supporting refugee and migrant women in London-based third sector organisations. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies47(13): 3097–3113.
19.
MidgleyJ (2018) ‘You were a lifesaver’: Encountering the potentials of vulnerability and self-care in a community café. Ethics and Social Welfare12(1): 49–64.
20.
NguyenMTNZavorettiRTrontoJC (2017) Beyond the global care chain: Boundaries, institutions and ethics of care. Ethics and Social Welfare11(3): 199–212.
21.
PeterieM (2018) Personal care as political activism: Refugee and asylum seeker friendship programmes. Australian Journal of Social Issues53(4): 400–415.
22.
PhillimoreJ (2020) Refugee integration opportunity structures: Shifting the focus from refugees to context. Journal of Refugee Studies. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/feaa012.
23.
PizzolatiMStercheleD (2016) Mixed-sex in sport for development: A pragmatic and symbolic device. The case of touch rugby for forced migrants in Rome. Sport in Society19(8–9): 1267–1288.
24.
Reid-HenrySM (2014) Humanitarianism as liberal diagnostic: Humanitarian reason and the political rationalities of the liberal will-to-care. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers39(3): 418–431.
25.
SchmidS (2019) Taking care of the other: Visions of a caring integration in female refugee support work. Social Inclusion7(2): 118–127.
26.
SchmidS (2020) Same same but different. How the play of difference intersects female refugee support workers’ constructions of a common identity. Social Identities26(2): 186–202.
27.
SemprebonMPelacaniG (2020) Dispersal and reception in Northern Italy: Comparing systems along the Brenner route. In: GloriousBDoomernikJ (eds) Geographies of Asylum in Europe and the Role of European Localities. IMISCOE Research Series. Cham: Springer Open, pp. 15–44.
28.
SevenhuijsenS (1998) Citizenship and the Ethics of Care: Feminist Considerations on Justice, Morality and Politics. London: Routledge.
29.
SirriyehA (2018) The Politics of Compassion: Immigration and Asylum Policy. Bristol: Bristol University Press.
SözerH (2020) Humanitarianism with a neo-liberal face: Vulnerability intervention as vulnerability redistribution. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies46(11): 2163–2180.
32.
TicktinM (2011) How biology travels: A humanitarian trip. Body & Society17(2&3): 139–158.
33.
TrontoJC (1993) Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. London: Routledge.
34.
TrontoJC (2013) Caring Democracy: Markets, Equality, and Justice. New York: New York University Press.
