Structured inequalities and authors’ positionalities in academic publishing: The case of Philippine international migration scholarship

Abstract

Spanish

French

This article examines structured inequalities and authors’ positionalities in the academic publishing field. It uses Bourdieu’s insights in explaining the reproduction of publishing inequality and mobility through cultural capital and habitus modification. The article elaborates ‘positionality’ to constitute structure and agency through position and positioning, and situates academics in varying positionalities (insider, outsider, hybrid) in the global publishing field. Focusing on Filipino international migration scholarship, the article examines 392 journal articles from 1989 to 2018, and tracks the first authors’ ethnicity, institutional affiliation, and university where they received their PhD. The findings show that authors institutionally affiliated in the Global North (insiders) dominate the field (publication count and citations), while homeland-based Filipino scholars are in the periphery (outsiders). With their insider-leaning hybrid positionality, overseas Filipino scholars in the Global North accrue network-mediated benefits. They have respectable representation in publication count and are the most frequently cited authors. Positionality is examined as cultural capital accumulation and adoption of the dominant habitus that enable academics to shift positionality from outsider to insider and derive benefits in research and publishing. The article contributes to the literature on positionality-based inequalities in knowledge production and a periphery standpoint in the discourse on academic publishing inequality.

Keywords

Cultural capital ethnicity habitus insider–outsider positionality knowledge production

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arnado

(2021) Cultural whitening, mobility and differentiation: Lived experiences of Filipina wives to white men. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 47(9): 1994–2010.

Babović

(2018) Gender and economic inequalities: Trends in feminist economics and sociology at the centre and semi-periphery of the global knowledge production system. Sociologija 60(1): 11–34.

Bakkalbasi

Bauer

Glover

, et al. (2006) Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science. Biomedical Digital Libraries 3(1): Article 7.

Banks

(1998) The lives and values of researchers: Implications for educating citizens in a multicultural society. Educational Researcher 27(7): 4–17.

Benfield

Howard

(2000) The language of science. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 18(6): 642–648.

Bhambra

(2014) Introduction: Knowledge production in global context: Power and coloniality. Current Sociology 62(4): 451–456.

Bourdieu

(1969) Intellectual field and creative project. Information (International Social Science Council) 8(2): 89–119.

Bourdieu

(1984) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge.

Bourdieu

(1986) The forms of capital. In: Richardson

(ed.) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. Westport, CT: Greenwood, pp. 241–258.

10.

Bourdieu

(1988) Homo Academicus. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

11.

Bourdieu

Wacquant

(1992) An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

12.

Canagarajah

(1996) ‘Nondiscursive’ requirements in academic publishing, material resources of periphery scholars, and the politics of knowledge production. Written Communication 13(4): 435–472.

13.

Carter

Lapum

Lavallée

, et al. (2014) Explicating positionality: A journey of dialogical and reflexive storytelling. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 13(1): 362–376.

14.

Chavez

(2008) Conceptualizing from the inside: Advantages, complications, and demands on insider positionality. The Qualitative Report 13(3): 474–494.

15.

Collins

(1989) The social construction of black feminist thought. Signs 14(4): 745–773.

16.

Collins

(1999) Reflections on the outsider within. Journal of Career Development 26(1): 85–88.

17.

Costa

Murphy

(2015) Bourdieu and the application of habitus across the social sciences. In: Costa

Murphy

(eds) Bourdieu, Habitus and Social Research: The Art of Application. Cham: Springer.

18.

Cousin

(2010) Positioning positionality. In: Savin-Baden

Magor

(eds) New Approaches to Qualitative Research: Wisdom and Uncertainty. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 9–18.

19.

Davis

Patterson

(2001) Determinants of variations in journal publication rates of economists. The American Economist 45(1): 86–91.

20.

England

(1994) Getting personal: Reflexivity, positionality, and feminist research. The Professional Geographer 46(1): 80–89.

21.

Falagas

Kouranos

Arencibia-Jorge

, et al. (2008) Comparison of SCImago journal rank indicator with journal impact factor. The FASEB Journal 22(8): 2623–2628.

22.

Foucault

(1980) Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977. London: Vintage.

23.

Ganga

Scott

(2006) Cultural ‘insiders’ and the issue of positionality in qualitative migration research: Moving ‘across’ and moving ‘along’ researcher–participant divides. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research 7(3).

24.

Huang

(2010) Publishing and learning writing for publication in English: Perspectives of NNES PhD students in science. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9(1): 33–44.

25.

Jensen

(1953) Mannheim. Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge (Book review). Social Forces 32(1): 196.

26.

(2013) Habitus transformation: Immigrant mothers’ cultural translation of educational strategies in Korea. Asia-Pacific Education, Language Minorities and Migration (ELMM) Network Working Paper Series. 7.

27.

Kong

Qian

(2019) Knowledge circulation in urban geography/urban studies, 1990–2010: Testing the discourse of Anglo-American hegemony through publication and citation patterns. Urban Studies 56(1): 44–80.

28.

Lamont

(2009) How Professors Think. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

29.

Link

(1998) US and non-US submissions: An analysis of reviewer bias. JAMA 280(3): 246–247.

30.

McCarthy

(2007) Sociology of knowledge. In: Ritzer

(ed.) The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology. Malden, MA, Oxford and Victoria: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 2482–2485.

31.

May

RAB

(2014) When the methodological shoe is on the other foot: African American interviewer and White interviewees. Qualitative Sociology 37(1): 117–136.

32.

Mearsheimer

(2016) Benign hegemony. International Studies Review 18(1): 147–149.

33.

Meriläinen

Tienari

Thomas

, et al. (2008) Hegemonic academic practices: Experiences of publishing from the periphery. Organization 15(4): 629–642.

34.

Merriam

Johnson-Bailey

Lee

M-Y

, et al. (2001) Power and positionality: Negotiating insider/outsider status within and across cultures. International Journal of Lifelong Education 20(5): 405–416.

35.

Merton

(1937) The sociology of knowledge. Isis 27(3): 493–503.

36.

Ravallion

Wagstaff

(2011) On measuring scholarly influence by citations. Scientometrics 88(1): Article 321.

37.

Ritzer

(2010) Sociological Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

38.

Sharp

(2008) Geographies of Postcolonialism. London: Sage.

39.

Smith

(1990) The Conceptual Practices of Power: A Feminist Sociology of Knowledge. Boston: Northeastern University.

40.

Svensson

(2005) Ethnocentricity in top marketing journals. Marketing Intelligence & Planning 23(5): 422–434.

41.

von Rosenberg

(2016) Education as habitus transformations. Educational Philosophy and Theory 48(14): 1486–1496.

42.

Weiner

(1998) Scholarship, disciplinary hegemony and power in academic publishing private. In: European Conference for Educational Research, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia, 17–25 September. 14 pp.

43.

Wellmon

Piper

(2017) Publication, power, and patronage: On inequality and academic publishing. Critical Inquiry 43: 1–20.