The aim of this article is to show how sociocybernetics can clarify and bring order to two key concepts in the social sciences: ‘observation’ and ‘reflexivity’. The article provides an introduction and conceptual overview of second order cybernetics, placing it in the larger context of cybernetics and systems sciences studies. Since its inception, in cybernetics the role of the observer has been paramount. It is the observer who distinguishes systems of interest. It is the observer who communicates her observations and theoretical interpretations to the wider community of other observers. Critically, as Heinz von Foerster emphasises, with second order cybernetics the observer, since she is herself an observing system, should ‘enter the domain of her own descriptions’. With her second order studies, she is explaining herself to herself. Reflexively, she is obliged to engage in self-observation. The article sets out some of the theoretical and methodological implications of these propositions.
ArcherM (2012) The Reflexive Imperative in Late Modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
AshbyWR (1956) Introduction to Cybernetics. New York: Wiley.
4.
BarsalouLW (2012) The human conceptual system. In: SpiveyMMcRaeKJoanisseM (eds) The Cambridge Handbook of Psycholinguistics. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 239–258.
5.
BatesonG (1972) Steps to an Ecology of Mind. London: Intertext Books.
6.
BourdieuPWacquantLJD (1992) An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
7.
BuchingerEScottB (2010) Comparing conceptions of learning: Pask and Luhmann. Constructivist Foundations5(3): 109–120.
8.
ConwayFSiegelmanJ (2006) Dark Hero of the Information Age: In Search of Norbert Wiener, The Father of Cybernetics. New York: Basic Books.
9.
DeweyJ (1896) The reflex arc concept in psychology. Psychological Review3(4): 357–370.
10.
FlavellJH (1979) Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist34(10): 906–911.
11.
FreemanWH (2000) Brains create macroscopic order from microscopic disorder by neurodynamics in perception. In: ArhemPBlombergCLiljenstromH (eds) Disorder Versus Order in Brain Function. Singapore: World Scientific, pp. 205–220.
12.
GeertzC (1995) After the Fact. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
GeorgeF (1961) The Brain as a Computer. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
14.
GergenK (1999) An Invitation to Social Construction. London: Sage.
15.
GergenKSchraderSGergenM (2009) Constructing Worlds Together: Interpersonal Communication as Relational Process. Boston: Pearson Education.
16.
GeyerF (2002) The march of self-reference. Kybernetes31(7–8): 1021–1041.
17.
GiddensA (1991) Modernity and Self-identity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
18.
GlanvilleR (2002) Second order cybernetics. In: Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems. New York: UNESCO. Available at: www.eolss.net (accessed 8 March 2019).
19.
HarréRMoghaddamF (eds) (2003) The Self and Others: Positioning Individuals and Groups in Personal, Political, and Cultural Contexts. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.
LillyJC (1974) The Human Biocomputer. London: Abacus.
26.
LuhmannN. (1995) Social Systems. Stanford, CA.: Stanford University Press.
27.
MaturanaH (1969) Neurophysiology of cognition. In: GarvinPL (ed.) Cognition: A Multiple View. New York: Spartan Books, pp. 3–24.
28.
MaturanaHRVarelaFJ (1980) Autopoiesis and Cognition. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
29.
MuellerAMuellerKH (2007) An Unfinished Revolution? Heinz Von Foerster and the Biological Computer Laboratory, BCL, 1958–1976. Vienna: Edition Echoraum.
30.
OuspenskyPD (1947) In Search of the Miraculous. London: Routledge.
31.
PaskG (1960) The natural history of networks. In: YovitsMCCameronS (eds) Self-organising Systems. London: Pergamon Press, pp. 232–261.
32.
PaskG (1961) An Approach to Cybernetics. London: Hutchinson.
33.
PaskG (1963) The use of analogy and parable in cybernetics, with emphasis upon analogies for learning and creativity. Dialectica 2–3: 167–202.
34.
PaskG (1969) The meaning of cybernetics in the behavioural sciences. In: RoseJ (ed.) Progress of Cybernetics, Vol. 1. London: Gordon and Breach, pp. 15–45.
35.
PaskG (1975a) The Cybernetics of Human Learning and Performance. London: Hutchinson.
36.
PaskG (1975b) Conversation, Cognition and Learning. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
37.
PaskG (1976) Conversation Theory: Applications in Education and Epistemology. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
38.
PaskG (1981) Organisational closure of potentially conscious systems. In: ZelanyM (ed.) Autopoiesis. New York and North Holland: Elsevier, pp. 265–307.
39.
PaskG (1996) Heinz von Foerster’s self-organisation, the progenitor of conversation and interaction theories. Systems Research13(3): 349–362.
40.
PickeringA (2010) The Cybernetic Brain: Sketches of Another Future. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
41.
PoerksenB (2003) At each and every moment, I can decide who I am. Cybernetics and Human Knowing10(3–4): 9–26.
42.
SchonD (1984) The Reflective Practitioner. New York: Basic Books.
43.
ScottB (1996) Second-order cybernetics as cognitive methodology. Systems Research13(3): 393–406.
44.
ScottB (2000) Cybernetic explanation and development. Kybernetes29(7–8): 966–994.
45.
ScottB (2002) Cybernetics and the integration of knowledge. In: Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems. New York: UNESCO. Available at: www.eolss.net/ (accessed 20 October 2012).
46.
ScottB (2004) Second order cybernetics: An historical introduction. Kybernetes33(9–10): 1365–1378.
47.
ScottB (2006) Reflexivity revisited: The sociocybernetics of belief, meaning, truth and power. Kybernetes35(3–4): 308–316.
48.
ScottB (2007) The co-emergence of parts and wholes in psychological individuation. Constructivist Foundations2(2–3): 65–71.
49.
ScottB (2008) Observing selves and others: Outline of a methodology. In: Proceedings of the 19th European Meeting on Cybernetics and Systems Research, University of Vienna, 25–28 March 2008, pp. 630–635.
50.
ScottB (2009a) The role of sociocybernetics in understanding world futures. Kybernetes38(6): 867–882.
51.
ScottB (2009b) Conversation, individuals and concepts: Some key concepts in Gordon Pask’s interaction of actors and conversation theories. Constructivist Foundations4(3): 151–158.
52.
ScottB (2018) Sociocybernetic understandings of consciousness. Journal of Sociocybernetics15(1): 1–14.
53.
ScottB (in press) Sociocybernetic reflections on the human condition. Journal of Sociocybernetics.
54.
ScottBBansalA (2014) Learning about learning: A cybernetic model of skill acquisition. Kybernetes43(9–10): 1399–1411.
55.
ScottBShurvilleS (2011) What is a symbol?Kybernetes48(1–2): 12–22.
56.
SuppeF (ed.) (1977) The Structure of Scientific Theories, 2nd edn.Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
57.
UmplebyS (2003) Heinz von Foerster and the Mansfield Amendment. Cybernetics and Human Knowing10(3–4): 87–190. Available at: http://cepa.info/1876
58.
Von BertalanffyL (1950) An outline of general systems theory. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science1(2): 134–165.
59.
Von BertalanffyL (1972) The history and status of general systems theory. In: KlirG (ed.) Trends in General Systems Theory. New York: Wiley.
60.
Von FoersterH (1960) On self-organizing systems and their environments. In: YovitsMCameronS (eds) Self-organizing Systems. London: Pergamon Press, pp. 31–50.
61.
Von FoersterH (2003) Understanding Understanding: Essays on Cybernetics and Cognition. New York: Springer.
62.
Von FoersterHMeadMTeuberHL (1953) Editors’ introduction. In: Von FoersterHMeadMTeuberHL (eds) Cybernetics: Circular Causal and Feedback Mechanisms in Biological and Social Systems. New York: Josiah Macy Jr Foundation.
63.
Von FoersterHAbramovitzRAllenRBet al. (eds) (1974) Cybernetics of Cybernetics. BCL Report 73.38, Urbana, IL: Biological Computer Laboratory, Dept. of Electrical Engineering, University of Illinois.
64.
UmplebyS (2003) Heinz von Foerster and the Mansfield Amendment. Cybernetics and Human Knowing10(3–4): 87–190.
65.
WienerN (1948) Cybernetics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
66.
WileyN (1994) The Semiotic Self. Cambridge: Polity Press.
