The cross-national analysis of policies and services offers an innovative point of view to evaluate the role of the state, social movements, and supra-national bodies in fighting violence against women (VAW). By locating the starting point in time and grouping countries in temporal clusters, the article identifies the key actors of VAW policy-making in Finland, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, and the UK. After discussing features of single countries, the article identifies common trends in VAW policies. In conclusion, the article raises more ambitious comparative questions: By looking at history, can we detect VAW ‘policy regimes’? Are there patently exceptional cases? And what is the actual role of the state in fighting VAW? The article argues that the state is a powerful instrument, on condition that it acts under pressure from or in combination with both independent social movements and supra-national bodies.
AkoensiTDKoehlerJALöselFHumphreysDK (2012) Domestic violence perpetrators programs in Europe, Part II: A systematic review of the state of evidence. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology57(10): 1206–1225.
2.
AllwoodG (1989) French Feminisms: Gender and Violence in Contemporary Theory. London: UCL Press.
3.
ArtsWGelissenJ (2002) Three worlds of welfare capitalism or more? A state-of-the-art report. Journal of European Social Policy12(2): 137–158.
4.
AzambujaMNogueiraCNevesSDe OliveiraJM (2013) Gender violence in Portugal: Discourses, knowledge and practices. Indian Journal of Gender Studies20(1): 31–50.
5.
BalkmarDIovanniLPringleK (2009) A reconsideration of two ‘welfare paradises’: Research and policy responses to men’s violence in Denmark and Sweden. Men and Masculinities12(2): 155–174.
6.
CalabròARGrassoL (2004) Dal movimento femminista al femminismo diffuso [From the feminist movement to a diffused feminism]. Milano: Angeli.
7.
CharlesNMackayF (2013) Feminist politics and framing contests: Domestic violence policy in Scotland and Wales. Critical Social Policy33(4): 593–615.
8.
CimagalliF (ed.) (2014) Le politiche contro la violenza di genere nel welfare che cambia. Concetti, modelli e servizi. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
9.
CorradiCStöcklH (2014) Intimate partner homicide in 10 European countries: Statistical data and policy development in a cross-national perspective. European Journal of Criminology11(5): 601–618.
10.
DanforthB (2014) Worlds of welfare in time: A historical reassessment of the three-world typology. Journal of European Social Policy24(2): 164–182.
11.
Dimitrova-StullA (2014) Violence against women in the EU, State of play. Briefing, European Parliamentary Research Service, 130528REV2.
12.
DoganM (2002) Strategies in comparative sociology. Comparative Sociology1(1): 63–92.
13.
ErikssonMHesterMKeskinenSPringleK (2005) Tackling Men’s Violence in Families: Nordic Issues and Dilemmas. Bristol: The Policy Press.
14.
Esping-AndersenG (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Oxford: Polity Press.
15.
Esping-AndersenG (1999) Social Foundations of Post-industrial Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16.
European Parliament (1986) Resolution on Violence against Women. Doc. A2–44/86.
17.
FerreraM (1996) The ‘southern’ model of welfare in social Europe. Journal of European Social Policy6(1): 17–37.
18.
FilipćićK (2009) Legal responses to domestic violence: Promises and limits. In: Antić GaberM (ed.) Violence in the EU Examined: Policies on Violence against Women, Children and Youth in 2004 EU Accession Countries. Ljubljana: University of Ljubljana, pp. 115–123.
19.
FraserN (1994) After the family wage: Gender equity and the welfare state. Political Theory22(4): 591–618.
20.
Fundamental Rights Agency (2014) Violence against Women: An EU-wide Survey. Luxembourg: FRA.
21.
Hagemann-WhiteC (2009) Development of policy on violence against women in Germany: From the shelter movement to policies for a ‘chain of intervention’. In: Antić GaberM (ed.) Violence in the EU Examined: Policies on Violence against Women, Children and Youth in 2004 EU Accession Countries. Ljubljana: University of Ljubljana, pp. 103–113.
22.
HearnJMcKieL (2010) Gendered and social hierarchies in problem representation and policy processes: ‘Domestic violence’ in Finland and Scotland. Violence Against Women16(2): 136–158.
23.
HearnJPringleKMüllerU (2002) Critical studies on men in ten European countries: (3) The state of law and policy. Men and Masculinities5(2): 192–217.
24.
JaspardM (2007) L’Enquête nationale sur la violence envers les femmes en France (Enveff): Historique et context. In:ChetcutiNJaspardM (eds) Violences envers les femmes. Trois pas en avant, deux pas en arrière. Available at: http://www.reseau-terra.eu/IMG/pdf/JASPARD.pdf (accessed April 2015).
25.
JaspardMBrownECondonS (2003) Les Violences envers les femmes en France. Une enquête nationale. Paris: La Documentation Française.
26.
KantolaJ (2006) Feminists Theorize the State. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
27.
KantolaJ (2010) Gender and the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
28.
KellyL (2005) Moving in the same or different directions? Reflections on recent developments in domestic violence legislation in Europe. In: SmeenkWMalschM (eds) Family Violence and Police Response: Learning from Research, Policy and Practice in European Countries. London: Ashgate, pp. 83–103.
29.
LewisJ (2002) Gender and the welfare state. European Societies4(4): 331–357.
30.
LindströmP (2005) Violence against women in the Swedish context. In: SmeenkWMalschM (eds) Family Violence and Police Response: Learning from Research, Policy and Practice in European Countries. London: Ashgate, pp. 105–125.
31.
LombardoE (2003) EU gender policy: Trapped in the ‘Wollstonecraft dilemma’?European Journal of Women’s Studies10(2): 159–180.
32.
MontoyaC (2008) The European Union, capacity building, and transnational networks: Combating violence against women through the Daphne program. International Organization62(2): 359–372.
33.
O’ConnorJOrloffASShaverS (1999) States, Markets, Families: Gender, Liberalism and Social Policy in Australia, Canada, Great Britain, and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34.
O’ReillyJ (2006) Framing comparisons. Gendering perspectives on cross-national comparative research on work and welfare. Work, Employment and Society20(4): 731–750.
35.
OrloffAS (1993) Gender and the social rights of citizenship: The comparative analysis of gender relations and welfare states. American Sociological Review58(3): 303–328.
36.
RoggebandC (2012) Shifting policy responses to domestic violence in the Netherlands and Spain (1980–2009). Violence Against Women18(7): 784–806.
37.
Rossi-DoriaA (2010) Gli studi di storia politica delle donne sull’Italia repubblicana. Contemporanea30(3): 487–511.
38.
SelišnikI (2009) Missing measures against gender based violence. In: Antić GaberM (ed.) Violence in the EU Examined: Policies on Violence against Women, Children and Youth in 2004 EU Accession Countries. Ljubljana: University of Ljubljana, pp. 33–50.
39.
StricklandP (2012) Labour policy on domestic violence: 1999–2010. UK,House of Commons Library.
40.
United Nations (1985) Report of the World Conference to review and appraise the achievements of the United Nations decade for women: Equality, development and peace. Nairobi, July.
41.
Wave (2012) Country Report. Reality Check on Data Collection and European Services for Women and Children Survivors of Violence: A Right for Protection and Support?Vienna: Wave Office.
42.
WeldonSL (2002) Protest, Policy, and the Problem of Violence against Women: A Cross-National Comparison. Pittsburg: University of Pittsburgh Press.
43.
WeldonSL (2006) Women’s movements, identity politics, and policy impacts: A study of policies on violence against women in the 50 United States. Political Research Quarterly59(1): 111–122.
