The attention of social movement studies has so far tended to focus on visible phases of movements, neglecting latent ones. This study argues that invisible mobilizations may be critical in preparing the groundwork of public mobilizations, particularly in authoritarian contexts. Using a process-oriented constructivist account of mobilization which incorporates insights from resistance studies, this article analyzes the Kurdish case in Turkey in the authoritarian 1940s and semi-authoritarian 1950s. Based on in-depth interviews, memoirs, newspaper reports, and official documents, it is demonstrated that a latent Kurdish dissent emerged in this period through the constitution of a sense of shared grievance and common identity both in hidden ways within the submerged networks of Kurdish students and professionals, and in public and visible, yet disguised, ways. Incubating the movement out of the gaze of the authorities within the authoritarian context, this latent dissent formed the groundwork of public acts of defiance and mobilization which emerged towards the end of the 1950s as the political changes encouraged Kurdish dissenters to publicly declare their opposition, and expanded in the more liberal context of the 1960s.
McAdamD (1982) Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930–1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
38.
McAdamD (1988) Freedom Summer. New York: Oxford University Press.
39.
McAdamDTarrowSTillyC (2001) Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40.
McCarthyJZaldM (1977) Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American Journal of Sociology82(6): 1212–1241.
41.
McDowallD (2004) A Modern History of the Kurds. New York: I.B. Tauris.
42.
MalmisanijM (2004) Diyarbakırlı Cemilpaşazadeler ve Kürt Milliyetçiliği. İstanbul: Avesta.
43.
MelucciA (1989) Nomads of the Present. London: Hutchinson Radius.
44.
MelucciA (1996) Challenging Codes. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
45.
MigdalJ (2004) State in Society: Studying How States and Societies Transform and Constitute One Another. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
46.
PervanMAkekmekçiT (2010) Doğu Sorunu: Necmeddin Sahir Sılan Raporları. İstanbul: Tarih Vakfı Yurt Yayınları.
47.
OberschallA (1973) Social Conflict and Social Movements. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
48.
OlsonR (1989) The Emergence of Kurdish Nationalism and Sheikh Said Rebellion: 1880–1925. Austin: University of Texas Press.
49.
ÖztoprakS (2003) Şark Medreselerinde Bir Ömür. İstanbul: Beyan.
50.
RomanoD (2006) The Kurdish Nationalist Movement: Opportunity, Mobilization, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51.
RuppLTaylorV (1987) Survival in the Doldrums: The American Women’s Rights Movement, 1945 to the 1960s. New York: Oxford University Press.
52.
SchurmanRMunroW (2006) Ideas, thinkers, and social networks: The process of grievance construction in the anti-genetic engineering movement. Theory and Society35(1): 1–38.
53.
ScottJ (1985) Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.
54.
ScottJ (1990) Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.
55.
ScottJ (2009) The Art of Not Being Governed: An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.
56.
TaylorV (1989) Social movement continuity: The women’s movement in abeyance. American Sociological Review54(5): 761–775.
57.
TillyC (1978) From Mobilization to Revolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
58.
Van BruinessenM (1992) Agha, Shaikh and State. London: Zed Books.
59.
WhiteP (2000) Primitive Rebels or Revolutionary Modernizers? The Kurdish National Movement in Turkey. London: Zed Books.
60.
YavuzH (2001) Five stages of the construction of Kurdish nationalism in Turkey. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics7(3): 1–24.
61.
YaymanH (2011) Türkiye’nin Kürt Sorunu Hafızası. İstanbul: Doğan Kitap.
YılmazN (2007) Yakın Tarihin Tanığıyım. Ankara: Veng Yayınları.
64.
YükselM (2009) A ‘revolutionary’ Kurdish mullah from Turkey: Mehmed Emin Bozarslan and his intellectual evolution. Muslim World99(2): 356–380.
65.
YükselM (2011) Dengbêj, mullah, intelligentsia: The survival and revival of the Kurdish-Kurmanji language in the Middle East, 1925–1960. PhD Thesis, University of Chicago, USA.
