The 2010 G-20 summit marked the transition to a new multipolar world with participation of rising powers from the Global South. This article explores the new hopes for a more equitable future with a focus on the tripartite alliance of India, Brazil, and South Africa (IBSA). In contrast to their BRICS counterparts China and Russia, the IBSA countries have democratic political systems and share major foreign policy objectives, including UN Security Council reform. Rejecting deterministic and neoliberal models, this article presents a broader conceptualization of inclusive development and examines the trenches of development as contentious constructions. The IBSA countries’ legacies of steep socio-economic inequalities are compared with their most recent development records and stated ambitions of policy discourse. The article uses scenario construction to highlight stakes and choices for democratic development at this critical geopolitical juncture.
AkpanW (2010) Unequal rights? The promise, prospects and contradictions of rights-based development. In: ISA World Congress, Gothenburg.
2.
Amnesty International (2009) Failure to conduct impartial investigation into Kennedy Road violence is leading to further human rights abuses. AI: AFR 53/011/2009.
3.
AmorimC (2010) Let’s hear from the new kids on the block. New York Times, 14June.
4.
ANC (African National Congress) (2010 [1955]) Freedom Charter. Kliptown, South Africa: ANC.
5.
AvritzerL (2002) Democracy and the Public Space in Latin America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6.
BanerjiD (2009) Funding crisis hits efforts to make banking services easy for NREGA beneficiaries. The Economic Times, 21February.
7.
BarlowM (2010) Interviewed by Amy Goodman. Democracy Now, WBAI, 2July.
8.
CerneaMM (1991 [1985]) Putting People First: Sociological Variables in Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9.
ChakrabortyP (2007) Implementation of the National Rural Employment Guarantee Act in India: Spatial dimensions and fiscal implications. Working Paper 505. Levy Economics Institute, Annandale-on-Hudson.
10.
CHRI (Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative) (2009) Compliance with the Right to Information Act. New Delhi: CHRI.
11.
EscobarA (2009) Territories of Difference: Place, Movements, Life, Redes. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
12.
FergusonJ (1990) The Anti-politics Machine: Development, Depoliticization and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
FiszbeinASchadyN (2009) Conditional Cash Transfers: Reducing Present and Future Poverty. Washington, DC: World Bank.
14.
FlemesD (2007) Emerging middle powers’ soft balancing strategy: State and perspectives of the IBSA dialogue forum. German Institute of Global and Area Studies Working Paper 57.
15.
FreireP (2000) Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum.
16.
G-20 (2009) The G20 Toronto Summit Declaration. Toronto: G-20.
17.
GramsciA (1992) Selections from the Prison Notebooks. New York: International Publishers.
18.
GumedeW (2005) Thabo Mbeki and the Battle for the Soul of the ANC. Cape Town: Struik.
19.
HabermasJ (1991) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
20.
HallA (2008) Brazil’s Bolsa Família: A double-edged sword?Development and Change39(5): 799–822.
21.
HalperinMHSiegleJTWeinsteinMM (2010) The Democracy Advantage: How Democracies Promote Prosperity and Peace. New York: Routledge.
22.
HarveyD (2005) A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23.
HonnethA (1992) Der Kampf um Anerkennung: Zur moralischen Grammatik sozialer Konflikte. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
24.
IACHR (Inter-American Commission on Human Rights) (1997) Informe sobre la Situación de los Derechos Humanos en Brasil [Report on the Situation of Human Rights in Brazil]. Washington, DC: OAS-IACHR.
25.
IBGE (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística) (2005) Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de Domicilios. Brasilia: IGBE.
26.
IBSA (India-Brazil-South Africa Dialogue Forum) (2010) Fourth Summit of Heads of State/Government Brasilia Declaration, 16April. Brasilia: IBSA.
27.
IBSA (India-Brazil-South Africa Dialogue Forum) (2011) The IBSA Fund. Brasilia: IBSA.
28.
ILO (International Labor Organization) (2009) Child Labor and Responses in South Asia. Geneva: ILO.
29.
KhanS (2010) Provision of sustainable and liveable low income human settlements in the province of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. In: ISA World Congress, Gothenburg.
30.
KleinN (2007) The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism. New York: Henry Holt.
31.
KorzeniewiczRPMoranTP (2009) Unveiling Inequality: A World-historical Perspective. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
32.
KuznetsS (1955) Economic growth and income inequality. American Economic Review45(1): 1–28.
33.
LeibbrandtMWoolardIFinnAArgentJ (2010) Trends in South African income distribution and poverty since the fall of apartheid. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers 101.
34.
LipsetSM (1994) The social requisites of democracy revisited. American Sociological Review59(1): 1–22.
35.
MignoloW (2000) Local Histories/Global Designs: Coloniality, Subaltern Knowledges, and Border Thinking. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
36.
MiraftabFWillsS (2005) Insurgency and spaces of active citizenship: The story of Western Cape anti-eviction campaign in South Africa. Journal of Planning Education and Research25(2): 200–217.
37.
MitchellT (2002) Rule of Experts: Egypt, Techno-Politics, Modernity. Berkeley: University of California Press.
38.
MtshaliMRanigaTKhanS (2010) Indigenous knowledge systems (IKS), poverty alleviation and sustainability of community-based programmes and projects. In: ISA World Congress, Gothenburg.
39.
Nederveen PieterseJ (2001) Development Theory: Deconstructions/Reconstructions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40.
NichenametlaP (2011) Rural job plan turns five. Hindustan Times, 2February.
41.
PapeRA (2005) Soft balancing against the United States. International Security30(1): 7–45.
42.
PatemanC (1970) Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43.
PaulTV (2005) Soft balancing in the age of U.S. primacy. International Security30(1): 46–71.
44.
PrzeworskiAAlvarezMECheibubJALimongiF (2000) Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-being in the World, 1950–1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45.
ReisE (2005) Perceptions of poverty and inequality among Brazilian elites. In: ReisEMooreM (eds) Elite Perceptions of Poverty and Inequality. London: Zed Books, pp. 26–56.
46.
RoyA (2010) Walking with the comrades. Outlook (India), 29March.
47.
RSA (Republic of South Africa) (1995) Labor Relations Act, No. 66. Pretoria: Office of the President.
48.
SachsW (1991) The Development Dictionary: A Guide to Knowledge as Power. London: Zed Books.
49.
ScalonC (2011) Desigualdade, pobreza e políticas públicas: notas para um debate. Contemporânea1(1): 49–68.
50.
SchulzMS (1998) Collective action across borders: Opportunity structures, network capacities, and communicative praxis in the age of advanced globalization. Sociological Perspectives41(3): 587–616.
51.
SchulzMS (2001) Democracia y cambio de los medios en América Latina. Perfiles Latinoamericanos10(18): 9–28.
52.
SchulzMS (2007) Novas mídias, mobilização transnacional e as reestruturações das esferas públicas. Civitas – Revista de Ciências Sociais7(2): 108–128.
53.
SharmaS (2011) IBSA to take up nontariff barriers, investments. The Tribune (India), 21October.
54.
SjoblomDFarringtonJ (2008) The Indian National Rural Employment Guarantee Act: Will it Reduce Poverty and Boost the Economy?London: ODI.
55.
SoaresFVPerez RibasRGuerreiro OsórioR (2007) Evaluating the impact of Brazil’s Bolsa Família: Cash transfer programmes in comparative perspective. International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth (IPC-IG), Evaluation Note 21.
56.
SoltF (2011 [2009]) Standardizing the World Income Inequality Database. [SWIID Version 3.1]. Social Science Quarterly90(2): 231–242.
57.
StedileJP (2007) The neoliberal agrarian model in Brazil. Monthly Review58(9): 50–54.
58.
The Economist (2006) India’s Naxalites: A spectre haunting India: Maoist rebels are fighting a brutal low-level war with the Indian state. The Economist, 17August.
59.
UNDP (United Nations Development Program) (2011) Human Development Report. New York: UNDP.
60.
UNDP (United Nations Development Program) India (2011) Inequality-adjusted Human Development Index for India’s States. New Delhi: UNDP India.
61.
WebsterE (2010) The dilemma of militancy: Worker responses to the economic crisis in South Africa. In: ISA World Congress, Gothenburg.
62.
WoodGDibbenP (2008) The challenges facing the South African labour movement: Mobilization of constituencies in a changing context. Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations63(4): 671–693.
63.
World Bank (2011) World Development Indicators. Washington, DC: World Bank.
64.
YúdiceG (2003) The Expediency of Culture: Uses of Culture in the Global Era. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
65.
ZikodeS (2010) When the poor become powerful outside of state control. Pambazuka News: Pan-African Voices for Freedom and Justice504: 1–4.
