Restratification, a process which involves medical elites exerting control over members of their profession, was seen by the US sociologist Eliot Freidson as helping to maintain the continued dominance of the medical model and the profession’s ability to determine its own fate. Drawing on interviews with primary care doctors in England and California this article reports the emergence of new strata or elites, with groups of doctors involved in both surveillance of others and action to improve compliance in deficient individuals and organizations. The article compares responses of primary care doctors to these developments and explores the implications in the context of Freidson’s predictions.
BodenheimerTBerensonRRudolfP (2007) The primary care–specialty income gap: Why it matters. Annals of Internal Medicine146: 301–306.
4.
BoskC (1979) Forgive and Remember. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5.
BurgessRG (1991) Sponsors, gatekeepers, members, and friends: Access in educational settings. In: ShafferWBStebbinsRB (eds) Experiencing Fieldwork: An Inside View of Qualitative Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 43–52.
6.
CampbellSRolandMMiddletonEReevesD (2005) Improvements in the quality of clinical care in English general practice 1998–2003: Longitudinal observational study. British Medical Journal331: 1121–1123.
7.
CasalinoL (2004) Physicians and corporations: A corporate transformation of American medicine?Journal of Health Policy, Politics and Law29: 869–883.
8.
ChecklandK (2004) National service frameworks and UK general practitioners: Street-level bureaucrats at work?Sociology of Health and Illness26(7): 951–975.
9.
CoburnDRappoltSBourgeaultI (1997) Decline versus retention of medical power through restratification: An examination of the Ontario case. Sociology of Health and Illness19(1): 1–22.
10.
CunninghamR (2004) Professionalism reconsidered: Physician payment in a small-practice environment. Health Affairs23: 36–47.
11.
DentM (2005) Post-new public management in public sector hospitals? The UK, Germany and Italy. Policy and Politics33(4): 623–636.
12.
Department of Health (2000) The NHS Plan. A Plan for Investment. A Plan for Reform. London: The Stationery Office.
13.
Department of Health (2004) Practice Based Commissioning: Engaging Practices in Commissioning. London: The Stationery Office.
DomagalskiT (2007) Organisation and subjectivity in the US medical profession: Physician responses to structural changes within advanced capitalism. In: MuzioDAckroydSChalantJ-F (eds) Redirections in the Study of Expert Labour. Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 118–138.
16.
FlynnR (2004) Soft bureaucracy, governmentality and clinical governance: Theoretical approaches to emergent policy. In: GrayAHarrisonG (eds) Governing Medicine: Theory and Practice. Maidenhead: Open University Press, pp. 11–26.
17.
FreidsonE (1983) The reorganization of the professions by regulation. Law and Human Behavior7(2/3): 279–290.
18.
FreidsonE (1985) The reorganization of the medical profession. Medical Care Review42(1): 11–35.
19.
GrumbachKCoffmanJVranizanK. (1998) Independent practice association physician groups in California. Health Affairs17(3): 227–237.
20.
HoodCJamesOScottC (2000) Regulation of government: Has it increased, is it increasing, should it be diminished?Public Administration78(2): 283–304.
IOM (Institute of Medicine) (2001) Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the Twenty-first Century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
23.
KirkpatrickIAckroydSWalkerR (2005) The New Managerialism and Public Service Professions: Change in Health, Social Services and Housing. New York: Palgrave.
24.
KirkpatrickIKragh JespersenPDentMNeogyI (2009) Medicine and management in a comparative perspective: The cases of England and Denmark. Sociology of Health and Illness31(5): 642–658.
25.
KronebuschK (2009) Managed care regulation in the states: The impact on physicians’ practices and clinical autonomy. Journal of Health Policy, Politics and Law34(2): 219–259.
26.
LewisJ (1998) The medical profession and the state: GPs and the GP contract in the 1960s and the 1990s. Social Policy and Administration32(2): 132–150.
27.
McDonaldR (2009) Market reforms in English primary medical care: Medicine, habitus and the public sphere. Sociology of Health and Illness31(5): 659–672.
28.
McDonaldRHarrisonSChecklandK. (2007) Impact of financial incentives on clinical autonomy and internal motivation in primary care: An ethnographic study. British Medical Journal334: 1357–1359.
29.
McKinlayJMarceauL (2008) ‘When there is no doctor’: Reasons for the disappearance of primary care physicians in the U.S. during the early 21st century. Social Science and Medicine67(10): 1481–1491.
30.
MayC (2007) The clinical encounter and the problem of context. Sociology41(1): 29–45.
31.
National Audit Office (2008) NHS Pay Modernisation: New Contracts for General Practice Services in England. London: The Stationery Office.
32.
RichmanBDSchulmanKA (2011) A cautious path forward on accountable care organizations. Journal of the American Medical Association305: 602–603.
33.
RolandM (2004) Linking physician pay to quality of care: A major experiment in the UK. New England Journal of Medicine351: 1448–1454.
34.
RosenthalMLandonBNormandS. (2006) Pay for performance in commercial HMOs. New England Journal of Medicine355: 895–902.
35.
SheaffRRogersAPickardS. (2003) A subtle governance: ‘Soft’ medical leadership in English primary care. Sociology of Health and Illness25(5): 408–428.
36.
StraussACorbinJ (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. London: Sage.
37.
WaringJ (2007) Adaptive regulation or governmentality: Patient safety and the changing regulation of medicine. Sociology of Health and Illness29(2): 163–179.
