The origins and chronology of linking research and action are complex and cannot be attributed to any single discipline or any part of the world. People within and outside academe have linked research and action. In this introductory article, we begin by briefly tracing the methodological background to linking research and action, focusing particularly on action research, participatory research, and feminist research in order to situate the research presented in this monograph issue of Current Sociology. We then provide an outline of the articles that showcase through specific case studies how sociologists link research and practice in diverse contexts including health, culture, education, labor, migration, violence against women, and polling. We end by commenting that linking research and action has important implications for knowledge creation, distribution, shifting power relations for achieving social change, and, ultimately, challenging social structures for social justice.
AbrahamM (1995) Ethnicity, gender, and marital violence: South Asian women’s organizations in the United States. Gender and Society9(4): 450–468.
2.
AbrahamM (1998) Speaking the unspeakable: Marital violence against South Asian immigrant women in the United States. Indian Journal of Gender Studies5(2): 215–241.
3.
AbrahamM (2000) Speaking the Unspeakable: Marital Violence among South Asian Immigrant Communities in the United States. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
4.
AbrahamM (2005) Domestic violence and the Indian diaspora in the United States. Indian Journal of Gender Studies12(2 and 3): 428–451.
5.
AbrahamMChowENMaratou-AliprantiL. (2010) Contours of Citizenship: Women, Diversity and Practices of Citizenship. London: Ashgate.
6.
AbrahamT (2002) Women and the Politics of Violence. New Delhi: Har-Anand Publications.
7.
Abu-LughodL (2000) Contentious theoretical issues: Third world feminism and identity politics. Signs25(3): 25–29.
8.
AckerJBarryKEsseveldJ (1991) Objectivity and truth: Problems in doing feminist research. In: FonowMMCookJA (eds) Beyond Methodology: Feminist Scholarship as Lived Research. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 133–153.
9.
AddamsJ (1896) A belated industry. The American Journal of Sociology1(5): 536–555.
10.
AgarwalB (1985) Work participation of rural women in the Third World: Some data and conceptual biases. Economic and Political Weekly20 (51/52): A155ff.
11.
AlexanderJMohantyC (eds) (1997) Feminist Genealogies, Colonial Legacies, and Democratic Futures. New York: Routledge.
12.
AlvarezSE (1998) Latin American feminisms ‘go global’: Trends of the 1990s and challenges for the new millennium. In: AlvarezSEDagninoEEscobarA (eds) Cultures of Politics, Politics of Cultures. Boulder, CO: Westview, pp. 293–324.
13.
AmpofoAABeoku-BettsJNjambiWN. (2004) Women’s and gender studies in english-speaking Sub-Saharan Africa: A review of research in the social sciences. Gender and Society18(6): 685–714.
14.
ArgyrisC (1996) Actionable knowledge: Design causality in the service of consequential theory. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science32(4): 390–406.
15.
ArieliDFriedmanVJAgbariaK (2009) The paradox of participation in action research. Action Research7(3): 263–290.
16.
AtwehBChristiansenCDornanL (1998) Students as action researchers: Partnership for social justice. In: AtwehBKemmisSWeeksP (eds) Action Research in Practice: Partnership for Social Justice in Education. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 114–138.
17.
AwekotukuN (1991) Mana Wahine Maori: Selected Writings on Mari Women’s Art, Culture, Politics. Auckland: New Women’s Press.
18.
BachRWeinzimmerJ (2011) Exploring the benefits of community-based research in a sociology of sexualities course. Teaching Sociology39(1): 57–72.
19.
BakerELWhiteLELichtveldMY (2001) Reducing health disparities through community-based research. Public Health Reports116: 517–519.
20.
BarberP (2006) Becoming a Practitioner-Researcher: A Gestalt Approach to Holistic Inquiry. London: Middlesex University Press.
21.
BargalD (2006) Personal and intellectual influences leading to Lewin’s paradigm of action research. Action Research4(4): 367–388.
22.
BargalD (2008) Action research: A paradigm for achieving social change. Small Group Research39(1): 17–27.
23.
BargalDGoldMLewinM (1992) Introduction: The heritage of Kurt Lewin. Journal of Social Issues48(2): 3–13.
24.
BergAMEikelandO (eds) (2008) Action Research and Organisation Theory. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
25.
BlayE (1985) Social movements and women’s participation in Brazil. International Political Science Review6(3): 297–305.
26.
BlumerMLCGreenMSMurphyMJ. (2007) Creating a collaborative research team: Feminist reflections. Journal of Feminist Family Therapy19(1): 41–55.
27.
BoseCKimM (eds) (2009) Global Gender Research: Transnational Perspectives. New York: Routledge.
28.
BoserupE (1970) Women’s Role in Economic Development. London: George Allen Unwin.
29.
BrownLDTandonR (1983) Ideology and political economy in inquiry: Action and participatory research. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science19: 277–294.
BulbeckC (1998) Reorienting Western Feminisms: Women’s Diversity in a Post-Colonial World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33.
BunchC (1987) Passionate Politics: Feminist Theory in Action. New York: St Martin’s Press.
34.
BurawoyM (2005) 2004 American Sociological Association Presidential Address: For public sociology. The British Journal of Sociology56(2): 259–294.
35.
Byrne-JimenezMOrrMT (2007) Developing Effective Principals Through Collaborative Inquiry. New York: Teachers College Press.
36.
CampbellAGroundwater-SmithS (eds) (2006) Youth Participation and Community Change. Philadelphia, PA: Haworth.
37.
CassellCJohnsonP (2006) Action research: Explaining the diversity. Human Relations54(6): 783–814.
38.
ChakravartiU (1994) Whatever happened to the Vedic Dasi? In: SangariKVaidS (eds) Recasting Women: Essays in Indian Colonial History. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
39.
ClawsonDZussmanRMisraJ. (2007) Public Sociology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
40.
CoghlanDShaniA (2005) Roles, politics and ethics in action research design. Systemic Practice and Action Research18(6): 533–546.
41.
CollinsP (1990) Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness and the Politics of Empowerment. New York: Routledge.
42.
CollinsPH (2000) Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. New York: Routledge.
43.
ConnellRW (1995) Masculinities. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
44.
CrenshawK (1991) Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review43(6): 1241–1299.
45.
CutlerPHaywardR (2007) Researching public action and development concepts in the context of mental health. Development in Practice17(2): 301–306.
46.
DatarC (1993) The Struggle against Violence. Calcutta: Stree Publications.
47.
DeVaultM (1999) Liberating Method: Feminism and Social Research. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
48.
DickB (2004) Action research literature: Themes and trends. Action Research2(4): 425–444.
49.
DickB (2006) Action research literature 2004–2006: Themes and trends. Action Research4(4): 439–458.
50.
DickB (2009) Action research literature 2006–2008: Themes and trends. Action Research7(4): 423–441.
DimitriadisGWeisL (2001) Imagining possibilities with and for contemporary youth: (Re)writing and (re)visioning education today. Qualitative Research1(2): 223–240.
53.
Du BoisWEB (1903) The Souls of Black Folk. Chicago: McClurg and Company.
54.
EdelsonJLBibleAL (1999) Force bonding or community collaboration? Partnerships between science and practice in research on women battering. In: National Institute of Justice, Viewing Crime and Justice from a Collaborative Perspective: Plenary Papers of the 1998 Conference on Criminal Justice Research and Evaluation. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, pp. 25–38.
55.
EdenCHuxhamC (1996) Action research for the study of organizations. In: CleggSHardyCNordW (eds) Handbook of Organization Studies. London: Sage, pp. 526–542.
56.
EldenMChisholmR (1993) Emerging varieties of action research: Introduction to the special issue. Human Relations46(2): 121–142.
57.
FawcettSBPaine-AndrewsAFranciscoVT. (1995) Using empowerment theory in collaborative partnerships for community health and development. American Journal of Community Psychology23(5): 677–697.
58.
FerreeM (1990) Beyond separate spheres. Journal of Marriage and Family52(4): 866–887.
59.
FineMWeissLWeseenS. (2000) For whom? Qualitative research, representation and social responsibilities. In: DenzinNKLincolnYS (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd edn.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 107–133.
60.
FreireP (1970) Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum.
61.
FrisbyWMaguirePReidC (2009) The ‘f’ word has everything to do with it: How feminist theories inform action research. Action Research7(1): 13–29.
62.
GatenbyBHumphriesM (2000) Feminist participatory action research: Methodological and ethical issues. Women’s Studies International Forum23(1): 89–105.
63.
GaventaJ (1993) The powerful, the powerless, and the experts: Knowledge struggles in an information age. In: ParkPBrydon-MillerMHallB. (eds) Voices of Change: Participatory Research in the United States and Canada. Westport, CT: Bergin and Garvey, pp. 21–40.
64.
GiachelloALArromJODavisM. (2003) Reducing diabetes health disparities through community-based participatory action research: The Chicago Southeast Diabetes Community Action Coalition. Public Health Reports118: 309–323.
65.
GluckSPataiD (1991) Women’s Worlds: The Feminist Practice of Oral History. New York: Routledge.
66.
GonzalezNMollLAmantiC (2005) Funds of Knowledge: Theorising Practices in Households, Communities, and Classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
67.
GreenwoodDJLevinM (2000) Reconstructing the relationship between universities and society through action research. In: DenzinNKLincolnYS (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd edn.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 85–107.
68.
GreenwoodDJLevinM (2007) Introduction to Action Research: Social Research for Social Change, 2nd edn.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
69.
GrewalIKaplanC (eds) (1994) Scattered Hegemonies: Postmodernity and Transnational Feminist Practice. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
70.
GuijtIShahMK (eds) (1998) The Myth of Community: Gender Issues in Participatory Development. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.
71.
HardingS (1991) Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women’s Lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
72.
HatchJMossNSaranA. (1993) Community research: Partnership in black communities. American Journal of Preventive Medicine9 (Suppl.): 27–31.
73.
HattamRBrennanMZipinL. (2009) Researching for social justice: Contextual, conceptual, and methodological challenges. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education30(3): 303–316.
74.
HemmentJ (2004) Global civil society and the local costs of belonging: Defining violence against women in Russia. Signs29(3): 815–840.
75.
Hondagneu-SoteloP (1993) Why advocacy research? Reflections of research and activism with immigrant women. The American Sociologist24(1): 56–68.
76.
hooksb (1984) Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center. Cambridge, MA: South End Press.
77.
ImamAMamaASowF (1997) Engendering African Social Sciences. Dakar, Senegal: CODESRIA.
78.
IsraelBASchulzAJParkerEA. (1998) Review of community-based research: Assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annual Review of Public Health19: 173–202.
KannabiranKRamdasSRMadhusudhanN. (2010) On the Telangana Trail. Secunderabad: CACIR-Asmita.
81.
KatsuiHKoistinenM (2008) The participatory research approach in non-western countries: Practical experiences from Central Asia and Zambia. Disability and Society23(7): 747–757.
82.
KeckMESikkinkK (1998) Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
83.
KirbySMcKennaK (1989) Experience Research Social Change: Methods from the Margins. Toronto: Garamond Press.
84.
LewinK (1946/1948) Action research and minority problems. In: LewinGW (ed.) Resolving Social Conflicts. New York: Harper and Row, pp. 201–216.
85.
LewinK (1947) Frontiers in group dynamics. Part II. Human Relations1: 143–153.
86.
LykesBCoquillonE (2006) Participatory and action research and feminisms: Towards transformative praxis. In: Hesse-BiberS (ed.) Handbook of Feminist Research: Theory and Praxis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
87.
McTaggartR (1997) Guiding principles for participatory action research. In: McTaggartR (ed.) Participatory Action Research: International Contexts and Consequences. New York: SUNY Press.
88.
MaguireP (1987) Doing Participatory Research: A Feminist Approach. Amherst, MA: The Centre for International Education, University of Massachusetts.
89.
MaguirePBergeBM (2009) Elbows out, arms linked: Claiming spaces for feminisms and gender equity in educational action research. In: NoffkeSSomekhB (eds) Handbook of Educational Action Research. London: Sage, pp. 311–319.
90.
ManeyGMAbrahamM (2008/2009) Whose backyard? Boundary making in NIMBY opposition to immigrant services. Social Justice35(4): 67–81.
91.
MerrySE (2006) Human Rights and Gender Violence: Translating International Law into Local Justice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
92.
MiesM (1979) Towards a methodology of women’s studies. Occasional Papers, No. 77.
93.
MiesM (1991) Women’s research or feminist research? In: FonowMMCookJA (eds) Beyond Methodology: Feminist Scholarships as Lived Research. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, pp. 60–85.
94.
MinklerMWallersteinN (2003) Introduction to community-based participatory research. In: MinklerMWallersteinN (eds) Community-Based Participatory Research for Health. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 3–26.
95.
MiskovicMHoopK (2006) Action research meets critical pedagogy: Theory, practice, and reflection. Qualitative Inquiry12(2): 269–291.
96.
MohantyCT (1988) Under western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. Feminist Review30: 61–88.
97.
MohantyCT (2004) Feminism without Borders: Decolonizing Theory, Practicing Solidarity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
98.
NandyA (1994) The Illegitimacy of Nationalism. New Delhi: Oxford.
99.
NarayanAPurkayasthaB (2009) Living Our Religions: South Asian Hindu and Muslim Women Narrate their Experiences. Stirling, VA: Kumarian Press.
100.
NgRStatonPScaneJ (eds) (1995) Anti-Racism, Feminism, and Critical Approaches to Education. Westport, CT: Bergin and Garvey.
101.
OngA (1996) Strategic sisterhood or sisters in solidarity? Questions of communitarianism and citizenship in Asia. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies4(1): 107–135.
102.
OyewumiO (1997) The Invention of Women: Making African Sense of Western Gender Discourses. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
103.
PatelS (2006) Beyond binaries: The case for self reflexive sociologies. Current Sociology54(3): 381–395.
104.
PatelS (2010) The ISA Handbook of Diverse Sociological Traditions. London: Sage.
105.
PetersMRobinsonU (1984) The origin and status of action research. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science20(2): 113–124.
106.
PintoRMSchmidtCNTRodriguezPSO. (2007) Using principles of community participatory research: Groundwork for a collaboration in Brazil. International Social Work50(1): 53–65.
107.
PrashadV (2007) The Darker Nations: A People’s History of the Third World. New York: New Press.
108.
PurkayasthaB (2010) Interrogating intersectionality: Contemporary globalization and racialized gendering in the lives of highly educated South Asian Americans and their children. Journal of Intercultural Studies31(1): 29–47.
109.
PurkayasthaB (2005) Negotiating Ethnicity: Second-Generation South Asian Americans Traverse a Transnational World. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
110.
PurkayasthaBSubramaniamM (2004) The Power of Informal Networks: Lessons in Social Change from South Asia and West Africa. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
111.
PurkayasthaBSubramaniamMDesaiM. (2003) Gender scholarship in India: A partial review. Gender and Society17(4): 503–524.
112.
RahmanA (1991) The theoretical standpoint of PAR. In: Fals-BordaARahmanA (eds) Action and Knowledge: Breaking the Monopoly with Participatory Action Research. New York: Apex Press.
113.
RamazanogluCHollandJ (2002) Feminist Methodology: Challenges and Choices. London: Sage.
114.
ReasonPBradburyH (eds) (2001) Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice. London: Sage.
115.
ReasonPBradburyH (eds) (2008) Sage Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice, 2nd edn.London: Sage.
116.
ReidC (2004) Advancing women’s social justice agendas: A feminist action research framework. International Journal of Qualitative Method 3(3), Article 1.
117.
ReidCTomAFrisbyW (2006) Finding the ‘action’ in feminist participatory action research. Action Research4(3): 315–332.
118.
Rezai-RashtiG (1995) Multicultural education, anti-racist education, and critical pedagogy: Reflections of everyday practice. In: NgRStatonPScaneJ (eds) Anti-Racism, Feminism, and Critical Approaches to Education. Westport, CT: Bergin and Garvey. pp. 3–19.
119.
SangarKKVaidS (1989) Recasting Women: Essays in Colonial History. New Delhi: Kali for Women.
120.
SarmientoM (2003) Gender studies in Cuba: Methodological approaches, 1974–2001. Gender and Society17(1): 7–32.
121.
SedgwickE (1990) Epistemology of the Closet. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
122.
SmallSUttalL (2005) Action-oriented research: Strategies for engaged leadership. Journal of Marriage and Family67(4): 936–948.
123.
SmithD (1987) The Everyday World as Problematic. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
124.
SpragueJ (2005) Feminist Methodologies for Critical Researchers: Bridging Differences. Walnut Creek, CA: Rowman and Littlefield.
125.
StoeckerR (2002) Practices and challenges of community-based research. Journal of Public Affairs6(1): 219–239.
126.
StoeckerR (2009) Are we talking the walk of community-based research?Action Research7(4): 385–404.
SullivanMBhuyanRSenturiaK. (2005) Participatory action research in practice: A case study in addressing domestic violence in nine cultural communities. Journal of Interpersonal Violence20(8): 977–995.
129.
SussmanGEveredR (1978) An assessment of the scientific merits of action research. Administrative Science Quarterly23: 582–603.
130.
TagoreR (1921). Nationalism. London: Macmillan.
131.
TastsoglouEDobrowolskyA (2006) Women, Migration and Citizenship: Making Local, National and Transnational Connections. Farnham: Ashgate.
132.
WangCBurrisMAPingXY (1996) Chinese village women as visual anthropologists: A participatory approach to reaching policymakers. Social Science and Medicine42(10): 1391–1400.
133.
WeinerG (2004) Critical action research and third wave feminism: A meeting of paradigms. Educational Action Research12(4): 631–644.
134.
WilliamsJLykesB (2003) Bridging theory and practice: Using reflexive cycles in feminist participatory action research. Feminism and Psychology13(3): 287–294.
135.
Yu-NingL (ed.) (1992) Chinese Women through Chinese Eyes. New York: Armonk.
136.
Yuval-DavisN (1997) Women, citizenship and difference. Feminist Review57: 4–27.
137.
Yuval-DavisN (2006) Intersectionality and feminist politics. European Journal of Women’s Studies13(3): 193–210.
138.
Yuval-DavisNWerbnerP (1999) Women, Citizenship and Difference. London: Zed Books.
139.
ZuberiTBonilla-SilvaE (2008) White Logic, White Methods: Racism and Methodology. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
