Abstract
Evidence of genetic links to human behaviour are readily used by some to invalidate a `blank slate' conception of human nature, while evidence of plasticity is readily used by others to invalidate genetic essentialism. Such knocking down of `straw men' helps enforce the boundaries of insular fields even as it prevents more interesting investigation of what it means to be human. This article outlines the perspective of `reflexive epistemological diversity', a perspective that overcomes the mirror imaging insularities of both epistemological reduction and relativism (itself tending towards a form of reduction to language and interaction), as well as the naivety characteristic of simple epistemological diversity.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
