The current diversity within the sphere of intimacy has been explained in terms of `individualization', whereby individuals exercise choice in this area of their lives. This is argued to have resulted from changes affecting young women's lives — specifically, increased educational and occupational opportunities and subsequent reduced domestication. This article thus explores the interplay between young women's educational and subsequent occupational experiences and their intimate relationships with men, drawing on 30 in-depth interviews with young women. It argues that their different routes through education and employment position them in different settings, which facilitate or encourage opposing discourses of love and intimacy — romance and contingency — and subsequent intimate practices. This dynamic is shown to have some flexibility.
Adkins, L. and Roseneil, S. (1997) `Destabilizing Heteronormativity? Late/Post Modern Sexual Transformations', paper presented to `Beyond Boundaries: Sexuality across Cultures' conference, Amsterdam , 29 July—1 August.
2.
Beck, U. (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.
3.
Beck, U. and Beck-Gernsheim, E. (1995) The Normal Chaos of Love . Oxford: Polity Press.
4.
Bhopal, K. (1998) `How Gender and Ethnicity Intersect: The Significance of Education, Employment and Marital Status', Sociological Research Online3(3).
5.
Bradley, H., Erikson, M. and Williams, S. (2000) Myths at Work. Oxford: Polity Press.
6.
Christian-Smith, L.K. (1990) Becoming a Woman Through Romance. London: Routledge.
7.
Christian-Smith, L. K. (ed.) (1993) Texts of Desire: Essays on Fiction, Femininity and Schooling. London: Falmer Press.
8.
Cranny-Francis, A., Waring, W., Stavropoulos, P. and Kirkby, J. (2003) Gender Studies: Terms and Debates. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
9.
Duncombe, J. and Marsden, D. (1993) 'Love and Intimacy: The Gender Division of Emotion and “Emotion Work”, a Neglected Aspect of Sociological Discussion of Heterosexual Relationships', Sociology27(2): 221—41.
10.
Giddens, A. (1991) Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Oxford: Polity Press.
11.
Giddens, A. (1992) The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies. Oxford: Polity Press.
12.
Gillis, J.R. (1996) A World of Their Own Making: Myth, Ritual and the Quest for Family Values. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
Ginn, J. and Arber, S. (1999) `Women's Pension Poverty: Prospects and Options for Change', in S. Walby (ed.) New Agendas for Women. London: Macmillan.
14.
Heath, S. (1999) `Young Adults and Household Formation in the 1990s', BritishJournal of Education20(4): 545—61.
15.
Hey, V. ( 1997) The Company She Keeps: An Ethnography of Girls' Friendships . Buckingham: Open University Press .
16.
Holland, J., Ramazanoglu, C., Sharpe, S. and Thompson, R. (1998) The Male in the Head: Young People, Heterosexuality and Power. London: The Tufnell Press .
17.
Illouz, E. (1998) `The Lost Innocence of Love: Romance as a Postmodern Condition', Theory, Culture & Society15(3—4): 161—86.
18.
Jackson, S. (1993a) `Even Sociologists Fall in Love: An Exploration in the Sociology of Emotion', Sociology27(2): 201—20.
19.
Jackson, S. (1993b) `Love and Romance as Objects of Feminist Knowledge', in M. Kennedy, C. Lubelska and V. Walch (eds) Making Connections: Women's Studies, Women's Movements, Women's LivesLondon: Taylor and Francis.
20.
Jagose, A. (1996) Queer Theory: An Introduction. New York: New York University Press.
21.
Jamieson, L. (1998) Intimacy: Personal Relationships in Modern Societies . London: Polity Press in association with Blackwell.
22.
Jamieson, L. (1999) `Intimacy Transformed? A Critical Look at the “Pure Relationship''', Sociology33(3): 477—94.
23.
Langford, W. (1999) Revolutions of the Heart: Gender, Power and the Delusion of Love. London: Routledge .
24.
Lee, J.A. (1988) `Love-Styles', in R. J. Sternberg and M. L. Barnes (eds) The Psychology of Love. London: Yale University Press.
25.
May, C. and Cooper, A. (1995) `Personal Identity and Social Change: Some Theoretical Considerations', Acta Sociologica38: 75—85.
26.
McRobbie, A. (2000) Feminism and Youth Culture, 2nd edn. London: Macmillan.
27.
Mirza, H.S. (1992) Young, Female and Black. London : Routledge.
28.
Richardson, D. (ed.) (1996) Theorising Heterosexuality: Telling it Straight. Buckingham : Open University Press.
29.
Roseneil, S. (2000) `Queer Frameworks and Queer Tendencies: Towards an Understanding of Postmodern Transformations of Sexuality', Sociological Review Online5(3).
30.
Smart, C. (1996) `Desperately Seeking Post-Heterosexual Woman', in J. Holland and L. Adkins (eds) Sex, Sensibility and the Gendered Body. London: Macmillan.
31.
Smart, C. (1997) `Wishful Thinking and Harmful Tinkering? Sociological Reflections on Family Policy', Journal of Social Policy26(3): 301—21.
32.
Turner, W. (2000) A Geneology of Queer Theory. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
33.
Walby, S. (1997) Gender Transformations. London : Routledge.
34.
Ward, C., Dale, A. and Joshi, H. (1996) `Income Dependency within Couples', in L. Morris and E. Stina Lyon (eds) Relations in Public and Private: New Research Perspectives . London: Macmillan.
35.
Warren T. (2000) `Women in Low Status Part-Time Jobs: A Class and Gender Analysis', Sociological Research Online4(4).
36.
Weeks, J. (2000) Making Sexual History. Oxford : Polity Press.
37.
Weeks, J., Donovan, C. and Heaphy, B. (1996) Families of Choice: Patterns of Non-Heterosexual Relationships, a Literature Review, No. 2. London: School of Education, Politics and Social Science, South Bank University.
38.
Willmot, H. (2001) `Young Women and Intimacy' (doctoral thesis), University of Leeds.
