This article examines the provision of in-home health and social support services to elderly clients in the context of home as the site of care. It considers gender in the provision of home support services by a marginalized group of employed women; in the experiences of elderly clients receiving services in the private sphere of the ‘home’; in the relationships between old people, family member(s) and home support workers; and in the gendered use of space within the household in care work. Informed by a self-reflexive, autobiographical perspective, the researcher’s experiences as a daughter in a family receiving home care prompted the re-examination of qualitative panel data from 150 home care workers and 155 elderly clients. It examines issues of territory and boundary, control and cooperation, the symbolic significance of home and the negotiating of contingent relationships when public services are provided in the private sphere of home.
Armstrong, P. and Armstrong, H. (2004) ‘Thinking it Through: Women, Work and Caring in the New Millennium’, in K. R. Grant, C. Amaratunga, P. Armstrong, M. Boscoe, A. Pederson and K. Willson (eds) Caring For/Caring About: Women, Home Care and Unpaid Caregiving, pp. 5-43. Aurora, Ontario: Garamond Press.
2.
Aronson, J. (2004) ‘“Just Fed and Watered”: Women’s Experiences of the Gutting of Home Care in Ontario’, in K. R. Grant, C. Amaratunga, P. Armstrong, M. Boscoe, A. Pederson and K. Willson (eds) Caring For/Caring About: Women, Home Care and Unpaid Caregiving, pp. 167-183. Aurora, Ontario: Garamond Press.
3.
Bowdie, R. and Turwoski, A. (1986) ‘The Problems of Providing Services to the Elderly in Their Own Homes’, in A. O. Pelham and W. F. Clark (eds) Managing Home Care for the Elderly, pp. 31-46. New York: Springer.
4.
Campbell, L. D. and Martin-Matthews, A. (2003) ‘The Gendered Nature of Men’s Filial Care’, Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences58B(6): S350-S358.
5.
Després, C. (1991) ‘The Meaning of Home: Literature Review and Directions for Future Research and Theoretical Development’, The Journal of Architectural and Planning Research8(2): 96-114.
6.
Dill, A. E. P. (1991) ‘Transformations of Home: The Formal and Informal Process of Home Care Planning’, in J. F. Gubrium and A. Sankar (eds) The Home Care Experience: Ethnography and Policy, pp. 227-251. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
7.
Giddens, A. (1991) The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
8.
Hagestad, G. O. (1996) ‘On-Time, Off-Time, Out of Time? Reflections on Continuity and Discontinuity from an Illness Process’, in V. L. Bengtson and B. Neugarten (eds) Adulthood and Aging: Research on Continuities and Discontinuities, pp. 204-228. New York: Springer.
9.
Karner, T. X. (1998) ‘Professional Caring: Homecare Workers as Fictive Kin’, Journal of Aging Studies12(1): 69-82.
10.
Katz, C. and Monk, J. (1993) Full Circles: Geographies of Women over the Life Course. London and New York: Routledge.
11.
Martin-Matthews, A. and Campbell, L. D. (1995) ‘Gender Roles, Employment and Informal Care’, in S. Arber and J. Ginn (eds) Connecting Gender and Ageing, pp. 129-143. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
12.
Martin-Matthews, A. and Phillips, J. E. (2003) ‘Home Care Work in Canada and England: Comparative Perspectives of Home Care Workers on Relationship Issues in the Provision of Home-Based Services to Elderly Persons’, paper presented at the annual conference of the Gerontological Society of America, San Diego.
13.
Martin-Matthews, A. and Wakefield, S. (1993) Report of the Homemaker Services to the Elderly: Provider Characteristics and Client Benefit. Toronto: Ontario Ministry of Community and Social Services.
14.
Ray, R. E. (1999) ‘Researching to Transgress: The Need for Critical Feminism in Gerontology’, Journal of Women and Aging11(2/3): 171-184.
15.
Rowles, G. and Chaudury, H. (eds) (2005) Home and Identity in Late Life: International Perspectives. New York: Springer.
16.
Rubenstein, R. L. (1990) ‘Culture and Disorder in the Home Care Experience: The Home as Sickroom’, in J. F. Gubrium and A. Sankar (eds) The Home Care Experience: Ethnography and Policy, pp. 37-57. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
17.
Shanas, E. and Sussman, M. B. (1977) Family, Bureaucracy and the Elderly. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
18.
Shapiro, E. (2002) The Health Care Transition Fund Synthesis Series: Home Care, Cat. H13-6/2002-2 Ottawa: Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada; at: www.hc-sc.gc.ca
19.
Shapiro, E. (2003) ‘The Romanow Commission Reports and Home Care’, Canadian Journal on Aging22(1): 13-17.
20.
The Home Care Sector Study Corporation (2003) Canadian Home Care Human Resources Study: Synthesis Report. Toronto: Home Care Sector Study Corporation; at: www.homecarestudy.ca
21.
Twigg, J. (2004) ‘The Body, Gender and Age: Feminist Insights in Social Gerontology’, Journal of Aging Studies18(1): 59-73.
22.
Von Hof, T. (1991) ‘Homemaker Services to the Elderly: Impact on Family Caregivers’, unpublished MSc. thesis, Department of Family Studies, University of Guelph, Ontario.
