Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Post-apartheid South Africa has been increasingly integrated with the rest of the continent at various levels. The South African state has been at the forefront of processes that led to the New Partnership for Africa’s Development (NEPAD). This article fully endorses the argument that NEPAD is neo-liberal due to its resemblance to structural adjustment programmes and its adherence to policies associated with the so-called Washington consensus. The article examines the evolution and eventual adoption of NEPAD from the point of view of the social forces behind it. The central question at the heart of any developmental programme such as NEPAD is: which class rules, benefits from and shapes policies in their own image? The article argues that NEPAD is a programme by major South African corporations to restructure social relations on the continent to facilitate their penetration and capital accumulation.

Keywords

capital accumulation class neoliberalism NEPAD post-apartheid South Africa

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ADEDEJI, A. (2002) ‘From the Lagos Plan of Action to the New Partnership for Africa’s Development and from the Final Act of Lagos to the Constitutive Act: Whither Africa?’, in P. A. Nyong’o , A. Ghirmazion and D. Lamba (eds) Nepad: A New Path?, pp. 35-48. Nairobi: Heinrich Boll Foundation .

ADELZADEH, A. (1999) ‘The Cost of Staying the Course’ , Ngqo!: An Economic Bulletin of the National Institute for Economic Policy 1(1): 1-6 .

ADELZADEH, A. (2000) ‘Loosening the Brakes on Economic Growth’ , Ngqo!: An Economic Bulletin of the National Institute for Economic Policy 1(2): 1-5 .

ADESINA, J. O. (2003) ‘African Development Frameworks: Beyond Silences, Closure and Forgetting’ , South African Labour Bulletin 27(3): 16-19 .

AKE, C. (1995) ‘The Democratisation of Disempowerment’, in Jochem Hippler (ed.) The Democratisation of Disempowerment: The Problem of Democracy in the Third World, pp. 70-89. London: Pluto Press .

ALEXANDER, N. (2003) ‘New Meanings of Panafricanism in the Era of Globalisation’ , the Fourth Annual Frantz Fanon Lecture, DePaul University, Chicago, 8 October.

BOND, P. (2000) Elite Transition: From Apartheid to Neoliberalism in South Africa. London: Pluto Press .

CLARKE, S. (2001) ‘Class Struggle and the Global Overaccumulation of Capital’, in R. Albritton, M. Itoh, R. Westra and A. Zuege (eds) Phases of Capitalist Development: Booms, Crisis and Globalisations, pp. 76-92. New York: Palgrave .

CSI (CIVIL SOCIETY INDABA) (2002) ‘Resolution on the New Partnership for Africa’s Development’, adopted in Johannesburg , May.

10.

DANIEL, J. , NAIDU, S. and NAIDOO, V. (2003) ‘The South Africans Have Arrived: Post-Apartheid Corporate Expansion into Africa’, in J. Daniel, A. Habib and R. Southall (eds) State of the Nation, pp. 368-390. Cape Town: HSRC Press .

11.

GELB, S. (2002) South Africa, Africa and the New Partnership for Africa’s Development. Johannesburg: The EDGE Institute .

12.

LAMBRECHT, J. (2002) ‘Emerging Markets’, 19 July, unpublished.

13.

LARRI (LABOUR RESOURCE AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE) (2003) ‘Nepad: A New Partnership between Rider and Horse?’ , South African Labour Bulletin 27(3): 12-15 .

14.

LEHULERE, O. (1998) ‘A Critical Analysis of GEAR from a Human Rights Perspective’ , paper presented at annual Lawyers for Human Rights Conference, Durban, October.

15.

LESUFI, I. (2002) ‘Six Years of Neoliberal Socioeconomic Policies in South Africa’ , Journal of African and Asian Studies 37(3-4): 286-298 .

16.

MAFEJE, A. (2002) ‘Democratic Governance and New Democracy in Africa: Agenda for the Future’, in P. A. Nyong’o , A. Ghirmazion and D. Lamba (eds) Nepad: A New Path?, pp. 72-87. Nairobi: Heinrich Boll Foundation .

17.

MAIA, J. (2003) ‘IDC Has a Crucial Role in the Advance of Africa’, Thisday 30 October.

18.

MAKWAVARARA, T. (2003) ‘Shoprite Takes the Casual Approach’ , South African Labour Bulletin 27(5): 20-22 .

19.

MALOKA, E. (2003) ‘State Owned Enterprises are Restoring SA’s Pride in Africa’ , Sowetan 1 March.

20.

MANDEL, E. (1975) Late Capitalism. London: New Left Books .

21.

MARAIS, H. (1998) South Africa, Limits to Change: The Political Economy of Transformation. Cape Town: UCT Press .

22.

MBEKI, T. (2002) ‘Nepad is Africa’s Response to Globalisation’ , ANC Today 2(23): 1-5 .

23.

MUNEKU, A. C. (2003) ‘Checker Checkers Just up your Street’ , South African Labour Bulletin 27(5): 23-24 .

24.

NABUDERE, D. W. (2002) ‘Nepad: Historical Background and its Prospects’, in P. A. Nyong’o , A. Ghirmazion and D. Lamba (eds) Nepad: A New Path? Nairobi: Heinrich Boll Foundation .

25.

NALEDI (NATIONAL LABOUR AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE) (2003) ‘What will Drive Nepad Forward: Bus or Bicycle?’ , South African Labour Bulletin 27(3): 8-11 .

26.

NEPAD (THE NEW PARTNERSHIP FOR AFRICA’S DEVELOPMENT) (2001) October. Pretoria: Government of the Republic of South Africa.

27.

PATEL, S. and PRETORIUS, L. (2002) ‘A Summary of the New Partnership for Africa’s Development’ , Khanya: A Journal for Activists 1: 22-23 .

28.

PATEL, S. and PRETORIUS, L. (2002) ‘Nepad: Integrating Africa into Neoliberal Globalisation’ , Khanya: A Journal for Activists 1: 24-26 .

29.

PETRAS, J. (1978) Critical Perspectives on Imperialism and Social Class in the Third World. New York: Monthly Review Press .

30.

PETRAS, J. and VELTMEYER, H. (2001) Globalisation Unmasked: Imperialism in the 21st Century. London: Zed Books .

31.

RADEBE, J. (2004) ‘Africa First: Introduction’, in Africa First: South African State Owned Enterprises in Africa. Pretoria: Ministry of Public Enterprises .

South Africa and the Rest of the Continent: Towards a Critique of the Political Economy of NEPAD

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References