Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Two new concepts have recently made their way into the theoretical market of the social sciences: the concept of mechanism and that of sociological machine. This article offers an analysis of the concept of mechanism and suggests that in itself it is insufficient to rebuild current practice in the social sciences. It then discusses the complementary notion of sociological machine to show that it allows us to go deeper into the solution to some of the problems that mechanisms were unable to solve. The article can be read as a contribution to the old debate concerning the role of mechanistic explanation in the social sciences.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

BOUDON, R. (1977) Effets pervers et ordre social. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France .

BOUDON, R. (1984) La Place du désordre. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France .

BOURDIEU, P. (1980) Le Sens pratique. Paris: Editions de Minuit .

BUNGE, M. (1996) Finding Philosophy in Social Sciences. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press .

CARTWRIGHT, N. (1999) ‘Ceteris Paribus Laws and Socio-Economics Machines’, in The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .

COLEMAN, J. (1990) Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .

ELSTER, J. (1976) ‘A Note on Hysteresis in the Social Sciences’ , Synthèse 33: 371-391 .

ELSTER, J. (1982) Explaining Technological Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .

ELSTER, J. (1983) Sour Grapes: Studies in the Subversion of Rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .

10.

ELSTER, J. (1989) Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .

11.

ELSTER, J. (1998) ‘A Plea for Mechanisms’, in P. Hedstrom and R. Swedberg (eds) Social Mechanisms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .

12.

GEERTZ, C. (1973) The Interpretation of Cultures. London: Fontana Press .

13.

HEMPEL, C. (1965) ‘Aspects of Scientific Explanation’, in C. Hempel (ed.) Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science. New York: Free Press .

14.

HUMPREYS, P. (1981) ‘Aleatory Explanation’ , Synthèse 48: 225-232 .

15.

KITCHER, P. (1981) ‘Explanatory Unification’ , Philosophy of Science 48: 507-531 .

16.

KITCHER, P. (1985) ‘Two Approaches to Explanation’ , Journal of Philosophy 82: 632-639 .

17.

KITCHER, P. (1989) ‘Explanatory Unification and the Causal Structure of the World’, in P. Kitcher and W. Salmon (eds) Scientific Explanation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press .

18.

MERTON, R. (1957) Social Theory and Social Structure, rev. edn. New York: Free Press .

19.

NOZICK, R. (1997) ‘Why Do Intellectuals Oppose Capitalism?’, in R. Nozick (ed.) Socratic Puzzles. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .

20.

RAILTON, P. (1978) ‘A Deductive-Nomological Model of Probabilistic Explanation’ , Philosophy of Science 45: 206-226 .

21.

RAILTON, P. (1981) ‘Probability, Explanation and Information’ , Synthèse 48: 233-256 .

22.

RESNICK, M. (1997) Turtles, Termites and Traffic Jams: Explorations in Massively Parallel Microworlds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .

23.

RIOS, D. and MAGNI-BERTON, R. (2003) La Misère des intellectuels. Pourquoi s’opposent-ils au capitalisme? Paris: L’Harmattan .

24.

RUNCIMAN, G. (1966) Relative Deprivation and Social Justice. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul .

25.

SALMON, W. (1984) Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .

26.

SALMON, W. (1989) ‘Four Decades of Scientific Explanation’, in P. Kitcher and W. Salmon (ed.) Scientific Explanation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press .

27.

VAN PARIJS, P. (1981) Evolutionary Explanations in the Social Sciences: An Emerging Paradigm. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield .

Mechanistic Explanations in the Social Sciences

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References