Quantitative cross-national analysis (CNA) is one of the most frequently used research methods in empirical sociology, particularly in research on developing countries. Its frequent application implies that CNA is a useful instrument that yields trustworthy results. However, numerous criticisms, which call into question the method's legitimacy, can be found in the relevant literature. This article discusses the most important among these criticisms, and explores three particularly problematic issues: comparability of national societies, case independence, and accuracy of `official' data material. Although these issues represent potential difficulties and shortcomings of quantitative cross-national research, there are elegant solutions. The article provides information about these solutions and demonstrates that CNA is indeed a useful research tool for sociologists.
Akinsanya, Adeoye A. (1984) Multinationals in a Changing Environment. A Study of Business-Government Relations in the Third World, 2nd edn.New York: Praeger.
2.
Alderson, Arthur S. and Nielsen, Franćois (1999) `Income Inequality, Development, and Dependence. A Reconsideration', American Sociological Review64: 606-631.
3.
Alesina, Alberto and Perotti, Roberto (1996) `Income Distribution, Political Instability and Investment', European Economic Review109: 465-489.
4.
Bach, Robert L. (1977) `Methods of Analysis in the Study of the World-Economy. A Comment on Rubinson, ASR, August, 1976', American Sociological Review42(5): 811-814.
5.
Ballmer-Cao, Than-Huyen and Scheidegger, Jürg (1979) `Compendium of Data for World-System Analyses', in Volker Bornschier and Peter Heintz (eds) Bulletin of the Sociological Institute of the University of Zurich, March.
6.
Barro, Robert J. (1999) `Inequality, Growth, and Investment', NBER Working Paper 7038. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.
7.
Bollen, Kenneth A. , Entwisle, Barbara and Alderson, Arthur A. (1993) `Macro-comparative Research Methods', American Review of Sociology19: 321-351.
8.
Bornschier, Volker and Chase-Dunn, Christopher (1985) Transnational Corporations and Underdevelopment. New York: Praeger.
9.
Bornschier, Volker , Herkenrath, Mark and Ziltener, Patrick (2001) `Political or Economic Logic of Western European Integration? A Study of Convergence Comparing Member and Non-Member States', paper presented at 5th Conference of the European Sociological Association, Helsinki, August/September.
10.
Cardoso, Fernando E. (1977) `The Consumption of Dependency Theory in the United States', Latin American Research Review12(3): 7-24.
11.
Cardoso, Fernando E. and Faletto, Enzo (1976 [1969]) Abhängigkeit und Entwicklung in Lateinamerika. Deutsche Erstausgabe unter Berücksichtigung der Veränderungen und Ergänzungen des Textes in der erweiterten US-amerikanischen Ausgabe [first German edition including the changes and updates added to the original text in the reworked US-American edition]. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. [First published 1969: Dependencia y desarollo en América Latina. Ensayo de interpretación sociológica]
12.
Chase-Dunn, Christopher (1982) `The Uses of Formal Comparative Research on Dependency Theory and the World-System Perspective', in Harry M. Makler, Alberto Martinelli and Neil J. Smelser (eds) The New International Economy, pp. 117-137. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
13.
Deininger, Klaus and Squire, Lyn (1996) `Measuring Inequality. A New Data Base', World Bank Economic Review10(3): 565-591.
14.
Dixon, William and Boswell, Terry (1996) `Differential Productivity, Negative Externalities, and Foreign Capital Dependency: Reply to Firebaugh', American Journal of Sociology102(2): 576-584.
15.
Elder, Joseph W. (1976) `Comparative Cross-National Methodology', Annual Review of Sociology2: 209-230.
16.
Garson, G. David (NN) `PA 765 Statnotes: An Online Textbook', www2.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/pa765/statnote.htm (10 May 2001).
17.
Goldthorpe, John H. (1997a) `Current Issues in Comparative Macrosociology: A Debate on Methodological Issues', Comparative Social Research16: 1-26.
18.
Goldthorpe, John H. (1997b) `Current Issues in Comparative Macrosociology: A Response to the Commentaries', Comparative Social Research16: 121-132.
19.
Hopf, Christel , Rieker, Peter, Sanden-Marcus, Martina and Schmidt, Christiane (1995) Familie und Rechtsextremismus. Familiale Sozialisation und rechtsextreme Orientierung junger Männer. Weinheim and München: Juventa.
20.
Hopkins, Terence K. and Wallerstein, Immanuel (1967) `The Comparative Study of National Societies', Social Science Information5(1): 25-58.
21.
Hymer, Steven (1980) `Multinationale Konzerne und das Gesetz der ungleichen Entwicklung', in Dieter Senghaas (ed.) Imperialismus und strukturelle Gewalt. Analysen ueber abhaengige Reproduktion, 5th edn, pp. 201-242. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
22.
Kohn, Melvin K. (1987) `Cross-National Research as an Analytic Strategy. Presidential Address for the ASA', American Sociological Review52: 713-731.
23.
Lipset, Seymour M. (1959) `Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy', American Political Science Review53: 69-105.
24.
Messner, Steven F. (1989) `Economic Discrimination and Societal Homicide Rates: Further Evidence on the Cost of Inequality', American Sociological Review54: 597-611.
25.
Muller, Edward N. (1995) `Economic Determinants of Democracy', American Sociological Review60: 966-982.
26.
Osterfeld, David (1994) `The Liberating Potential of Multinational Corporations', in Doug Bandow and Ian Vásquez (eds) Perpetuating Poverty: The World Bank,the IMF, and the Developing World, pp. 271-315. Washington, DC: Cato Institute.
27.
Pindyck, Robert S. and Rubinfeld, Daniel L. (1998) Econometric Models and Economic Forecasts4th edn.Boston, MA: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.
28.
Przeworski , Adam, Alvarez, M., Cheibub, J. A. and Limongi, F. (1996) `What Makes Democracies Endure?', Journal of Democracy7(1): 39-55.
29.
Scheuch, Erwin (1966) `Cross-National Comparisons Using Aggregate Data: Some Substantive and Methodological Problems', in Richard L. Merrit and Stein Rokkan (eds) Comparing Nations. The Use of Quantitative Data in Cross-National Research, pp. 131-167. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.
30.
Singh, Harinder and Jun, Kwang W. (1995) `Some New Evidence on Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment in Developing Countries', unpublished paper. Washington, DC: International Finance Division, World Bank.
31.
Sirowy, L. and Inkeles, A. (1990) `The Effects of Democracy on Economic Growth and Inequality', Studies in Comparative International Development25: 126-157.
32.
Smith, Jackie , Chatfield, Charles and Pagnucco, Ron (1997) Transnational Social Movements and Global Politics. New York: Syracuse University Press.
33.
de Soysa, Indra and Oneal, John R. (1999) `Boon or Bane? Reassessing the Productivity of Foreign Direct Investment', American Sociological Review64: 766-782.
34.
Temple, Jonathan (1999) `The New Growth Evidence', Journal of Economic Literature37: 112-156.
35.
Tilly, Charles (1997) `Means and Ends of Comparison in Macrosociology', Comparative Social Research16: 43-53.
36.
UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development) (1995) World Investment Report 1995: Transnational Corporations and Competitiveness. New York and Geneva: United Nations.
37.
UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development) (1999) World Investment Report 1999: Foreign Direct Investment and the Challenge of Development. New York and Geneva: United Nations.
38.
UNCTC (United Nations Centre on Transnational Corporations) (1985) Transnational Corporations in World Development. Third Survey. London: Graham & Troutman.
39.
World Bank (1997) World Development Indicators. Washington, DC: World Bank (CD-Rom).
