Technology is central to contemporary theories of social, cultural and economic change, yet its treatment is still predominantly one of technological determinism. This article examines the development of the social studies of science and technology (STS) and its critique of this dominant position. It provides an account of the principal concepts that inform the area, which emphasize that technology is a socio-technical product, patterned by the conditions of its creation and use. Technology and society, rather than being separate spheres, are mutually constituted. In this way, STS adds an important dimension missing in recent social theory, one that is sensitive to the materiality of social relations and the power of objects. Finally, the article explores the contribution of scholars of gender and technology to both STS and feminist theory. For all the diversity to be found within the field, what has emerged is a powerful legacy of theory and research that promises to make a significant contribution to public debates in the 21st century.
Amin, A. , ed. (1994) Post-Fordism: A Reader. Oxford: Blackwell.
2.
Barnes, B. and Edge, D., eds (1982) Science in Context: Readings in the Sociology of Science. Buckingham: Open University Press.
3.
Bell, D. (1973) The Coming of Post-Industrial Society. New York: Basic Books.
4.
Berg, A. J. (1994) `A Gendered Socio-technical Construction: The Smart House', in C. Cockburn and R. F. Dilic (eds) Bringing Technology Home: Gender and Technology in a Changing Europe. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
5.
Berg, A. J. (1996) Digital Feminism, Report No. 28. Dragvoll, Norway: Senter for Teknologi og Samfunn, Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
6.
Bijker, W. E. (1995) Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7.
Bijker, W. E. , and Law, J., eds (1992) Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8.
Bijker, W. E. , Hughes, T. P. and Pinch, T., eds (1987) The Social Construction of Technological Systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9.
Callon, M. (1986) `Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fisherman of St. Brieuc Bay', in J. Law (ed.) Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge?, pp. 196-233. London: Routledge.
10.
Castells, M. (1996) The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell.
11.
Clarke, A. (1998) Disciplining Reproduction: Modernity, American Life Sciences, and `the Problems of Sex'. Berkeley: University of California Press.
12.
Cockburn, C. (1983) Brothers: Male Dominance and Technological Change. London: Pluto Press.
13.
Cockburn, C. (1985) Machinery of Dominance: Women, Men and Technical Know-How. London: Pluto Press.
14.
Cockburn, C. and Ormrod, S. (1993) Gender and Technology in the Making. London: Sage.
15.
Connell, B. (1987) Gender and Power. Cambridge: Polity Press.
16.
Cowan, R. S. (1983) More Work for Mother: The Ironies of Household Technology from the Open Hearth to the Microwave. New York: Basic Books.
17.
Dyer, R. (1997) White. London: Routledge.
18.
Faulkner, W. (2001) `The Technology Question in Feminism: A View from Feminist Technology Studies', Women's Studies International Forum24(1): 79-95.
19.
Giddens, A. (1990) The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
20.
Giddens, A. (1996) `Globalization: A Keynote Address', UNRISD News 15.
21.
Granovetter, M. (1985) `Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness', American Journal of Sociology91(3): 481-510.
22.
Grint, K. and Gill, R., eds (1995) The Gender-Technology Relation: Contemporary Theory and Research. London: Taylor & Francis.
23.
Habermas, J. (1971) `Technology and Science as “Ideology” ', in Toward a Rational Society. London: Heinemann.
24.
Haraway, D. (1997) Modest Witness@Second Millennium. New York: Routledge.
25.
Harding, S. (1986) The Science Question in Feminism. New York: Cornell University Press.
26.
Hartmann, H. , Kraut, R. and Tilly, L., eds (1986, 1987) Computer Chips and Paper Clips: Technology and Women's Employment, Volumes 1 and 2. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
27.
Held, D. (1995) Democracy and the Global Order. Cambridge: Polity Press.
28.
Held, D. , McGrew, A., Goldblatt, D. and Perraton, J. (1999) Global Transformations: Politics, Economics and Culture. Cambridge: Polity Press.
29.
Jasanoff, S. , Markle, G., Petersen, J. and Pinch, T., eds (1994) Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30.
Johnson, C. (2000) Governing Change: From Keating to Howard. Brisbane: University of Queensland Press.
31.
Kirkup, G. , Janes, L., Woodward, K. and Hovenden, F., eds (2000) The Gendered Cyborg: A Reader. London: Routledge.
32.
Knorr-Cetina, K. and Mulkay, M., eds (1983) Science Observed: Perspectives in the Social Studies of Science. London: Sage.
33.
Kuhn, T. S. (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
34.
Kumar, K. (1995) From Post-Industrial to Post-Modern Society: New Theories of the Contemporary World. Oxford: Blackwell.
35.
Latour, B. (1987) Science in Action. Buckingham: Open University Press.
36.
Latour, B. (1991a) The Pasteurization of France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
37.
Latour, B. (1991b) `Technology is Society Made Durable', in J. Law (ed.) A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, pp. 103-131. London: Routledge.
38.
Latour, B. (1992) `Where Are the Missing Masses? The Sociology of a Few Mundane Artifacts', in W. Bijker and J. Law (eds) Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39.
Latour, B. (1993) We Have Never Been Modern. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester.
40.
Law, J. (1987) `Technology and Heterogeneous Engineering: The Case of Portuguese Expansion', in W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes and T. Pinch (eds) The Social Construction of Technological Systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
41.
Law, J. (1999) `After ANT: Complexity, Naming and Topology', in J. Law and J. Hassard (eds) Actor Network Theory and After, pp. 1-14. Oxford: Blackwell.
42.
Law, J. and Hassard, J., eds (1999) Actor Network Theory and After. Oxford: Blackwell.
43.
Lukes, S. (1974) Power. London: Macmillan.
44.
MacKenzie, D. (1990) Inventing Accuracy: A Historical Sociology of Nuclear Missile Guidance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45.
MacKenzie, D. (1996a) Knowing Machines: Essays on Technical Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
46.
MacKenzie, D. (1996b) `How Do We Know the Properties of Artefacts? Applying the Sociology of Knowledge to Technology', in R. Fox (ed.) Technological Change: Methods and Themes in the History of Technology. London: Harwood.
47.
MacKenzie, D. and Wajcman, J., eds (1999) The Social Shaping of Technology, rev. and expanded edn. Buckingham: Open University Press. (Orig. pub. 1985.)
48.
Marcuse, H. (1968) One Dimensional Man. London: Sphere.
49.
Marcuse, H. (1969) An Essay on Liberation. Boston, MA: Beacon.
50.
Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. G. (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
51.
Noble, D. F. (1984) Forces of Production. A Social History of Industrial Automation. New York: Knopf.
52.
Oldenziel, R. (1999) Making Technology Masculine: Men, Women and Modern Machines in America. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
53.
Oudshoorn, N. (1994) Beyond the Natural Body: An Archaeology of Sex Hormones. London: Routledge.
54.
Pinch, T. and Bijker, W. (1987) `The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: Or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology Might Benefit Each Other', in W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes and T. Pinch (eds) The Social Construction of Technological Systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
55.
Sassen, S. (1996) Losing Control? Sovereignty in an Age of Globalization. New York: Columbia University Press.
56.
Star, S. L. (1991) `Power, Technologies and the Phenomenology of Conventions: On Being Allergic to Onions', in J. Law (ed.) A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, pp. 26-56. London: Routledge.
57.
Touraine, A. (1971) The Post-Industrial Society. London: Wildwood House.
58.
Turkle, S. (1995) Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet. New York: Simon & Schuster.
59.
Urry, J. (2000) `Mobile Sociology', British Journal of Sociology51(1): 185-203.
60.
Wajcman, J. (1991) Feminism Confronts Technology. Pennsylvania: Penn State University Press and Cambridge: Polity Press.
61.
Wajcman, J. (2000) `Reflections on Gender and Technology Studies: In What State is the Art?', Social Studies of Science30(3): 447-464.
62.
Young, B. (1977) `Science is Social Relations', Radical Science Journal (5): 65-129.
