Despite the high hopes of victims' rights advocates, and contrary to the warnings about negative consequences, the evidence demonstrates that victim impact statements (VISs) have had little influence on criminal proceedings and court outcomes. This study, based on interviews with judges, prosecutors, and defense counsels charged with the implementation of the VIS scheme in South Australia, shows that practitioners routinely objectify, and thereby minimize, the injuries sustained by victims, and impose an implicit “reasonable victim” test to evaluate VISs. Professionals' responses are analyzed according to Sykes and Matza's notion of techniques of neutralization as a case study of the ways in which law reform endeavors are subordinated to the competing value systems and organizational imperatives of court workgroups.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abrams, Kathryn
. 1992. “Hearing the Call of Stories.”California Law Review79:971-1052.
2.
American Friends Service Committee
. 1971. Struggle for Justice. New York: Hill and Wang.
3.
Ashworth, Andrew
. 1993. “Victim Impact Statements and Sentencing.”Criminal Law Review498-509.
4.
Australian Law Reform Commission
. 1987. Sentencing (Rep. No. 44). Canberra, Australia: AGPS.
5.
Bandes, Susan
. 1996. “Empathy, Narrative, and Victim Impact Statements.”The University of Chicago Law Review63:361-412.
6.
Cohen, Stanley
. 1993. “The Human Rights and Crimes of the State: The Culture of Denial.”Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology26:97-114.
7.
Daly, Kathleen
. 1991. “Of Numbers and Narrative.” Presented at the Law and Society Annual Meeting, June 22, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
8.
Daly, Kathleen
. 1994. Gender, Crime, and Punishment. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
9.
Davis, Robert C.
and Barbara Smith. 1994. “The Effect of Victim Impact Statement on Sentencing Decisions: A Test in an Urban Setting.”Justice Quarterly11:453-469.
10.
Delgado, Richard
. 1989. “Storytelling for Oppositionists and Others: A Plea for Narrative.”Michigan Law Review87:2411-2441.
11.
Douglas, Roger
and Kathy Laster. 1992. Reforming the People's Court: Victorian Magistrates' Reaction to Change. Canberra, Australia: Criminology Research Council.
12.
Douglas, Roger
and Kathy Laster. 1994. Victim Information and the Criminal Justice System: Adversarial or Technocratic Reform?Canberra, Australia: Criminology Research Council.
13.
Douglas, Roger
, Kathy Laster, and Nancy Inglis. 1994. “Victims of Efficiency: Tracking Victim Information Through the System in Victoria, Australia.”International Review of Victimology3:95-110.
14.
Eisenstein, James
and Herbert Jacob. 1977. Felony Justice. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
15.
Erez, Edna
. 1989. “The Impact of Victimology on Criminal Justice Policy.”Criminal Justice Policy Review3:236-256.
16.
Erez, Edna
. 1994. “Victim Participation in Sentencing: And the Debate Goes On.”International Review of Victimology3:17-32.
17.
Erez, Edna
. 1999. “Who is Afraid of the Big Bad Victim? Victim Impact Statements as Victim Empowerment and Enhancement of Justice.”Criminal Law ReviewJuly:545-556.
18.
Erez, Edna
and Leigh Roeger. 1995. “The Effect of Victim Impact Statements on Sentencing Outcomes and Dispositions.”Journal of Criminal Justice23:363-375.
19.
Erez, Edna
, Leigh Roeger, and Frank Morgan. 1994. Victim Impact Statements in South Australia: An Evaluation (Series C, No. 6). Adelaide, Australia: South Australian Attorney General's Department.
20.
Erez, Edna
and Linda Rogers. 1999. “The Effects of Victim Impact Statements on Court Outcomes and Processes: The Perspectives of Legal Professionals.”British Journal of Criminology39:216-239.
21.
Erez, Edna
and Leslie Sebba. 1999. “From Individualization of the Offender to Individualization of the Victim: Wolfgang's Conceptualization of a Victim Oriented Criminal Justice.” Pp. 171-198 in Advances in Criminological Theory, vol. 8, edited by F. Adler and W. Laufer. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
22.
Erez, Edna
and Pamela Tontodonato. 1990. “The Effects of Victim Participation in Sentencing on Sentence Outcome.”Criminology28:451-474.
23.
Feeley, Malcolm M.
1979. The Process is the Punishment. New York: Russell Sage.
24.
Feeley, Malcolm M.
and Jonathan Simon. 1992. “The New Penology: Notes on the Emerging Strategy of Corrections and its Implications.”Criminology30:449-474.
25.
Fogel, David
. 1975. We Are the Living Proof: The Justice Model for Corrections. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
26.
Frohman, Lisa
. 1991. “Discrediting Victim's Allegations of Sexual Assault: Prosecutorial Accounts of Case Rejections.”Social Problems38:213-226.
27.
Frohman, Lisa
. 1996. “Hard Cases: Prosecutorial Accounts for Filing Unconvictable Sexual Assaults Complaints.”Current Research on Occupations and Professions9:189-209.
28.
Glaser, Barney G.
and Anselm L. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
29.
Goldstein, Abraham S.1982. “The Victim and Prosecutorial Discretion: The Federal Victim and Witness Protection Act of 1982.”Law and Contemporary Problems47:225-248.
30.
Grabosky, Peter N.
1987. “Victims in the Criminal Justice System.” Pp. 143-157 in The Criminal Injustice System, vol. 2, edited by G. Zdenkowski, C. Ronalds, and M. Richardson. Sydney, Australia: Pluto Press.
31.
Greenberg, Martin
and Barry Ruback. 1985. “A Model of Crime Victim Decision-Making.”Victimology: An International Journal10:600-616.
32.
Hall, Donald J.1991. “Victim Voices in Criminal Court: The Need for Restraint.”American Criminal Law Review28:233-266.
33.
Hellerstein, Dina R.1989. “Victim Impact Statement: Reform or Reprisal?”American Criminal Law Review27:391-430.
34.
Henderson, Lynn
. 1985. “The Wrongs of Victims' Rights.”Stanford Law Review37:937-1021.
35.
Henley, M.
, Robert C. Davis, and Barbara E. Smith. 1994. “The Reactions of Prosecutors and Judges to Victim Impact Statements.”International Review of Victimology3:83-93.
36.
Heydebrand, Wolf
and Carroll Seron. 1990. Rationalizing Justice: The Political Economy of Federal District Courts. Albany: State University of New York Press.
37.
Higginbotham, Leon, Jr.
1978. In the Matter of Color: Race and the American Legal Process. New York: Oxford University Press.
38.
Kelly, Deborah
. 1987. “Victims.”Wayne Law Review34:69-86.
39.
Kelly, Deborah
and Edna Erez. 1997. “Victim Participation in the Criminal Justice System.” Pp. 231-244 in Victims of Crime, edited by R. C. Davis, A. J. Lurigio, and W. Skogan. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40.
Konradi, Amanda
and Tina Burger. Forthcoming. “Having the Last Word: An Examination of Rape Survivors Participation in Sentencing.” Presented at the Society for the Study of Social Problems Annual Meeting, Toronto, Canada.
41.
Laster, Kathy
. 1997. Law as Culture. Sydney, Australia: Federation Press.
42.
Laster, Kathy
and Pat O'Malley. 1996. “Sensitive New Age Laws: the Reassertion of Emotionality in Law.”International Journal of the Sociology of Law24:21-40.
43.
Maynard, Douglas W.1982. “Defendant Attributes in Plea Bargaining: Notes on the Modeling of Sentencing Decisions.”Social Problems46:347-360.
44.
McLeod, Maureen
. 1986. “Victim Participation in Sentencing.”Criminal Law Bulletin22:501-517.
45.
Naffine, Ngaire
. 1990. The Law and the Sexes: Exploration in Feminist Jurisprudence. Boston, MA: Allen & Unwin.
46.
O'Malley, Pat
. 1984. “Technocratic Justice in Australia.”Law in Context: A Socio-Legal Journal2:31-49.
47.
President's Task Force on Victims of Crime
. 1982. Final Report. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
48.
Rubel, Howard C.1986. “Victim Participation in Sentencing Proceedings.”Criminal Law Quarterly28:226-250.
49.
Sebba, Leslie
. 1996. Third Parties: Victims and the Criminal Justice System. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
50.
Stanko, Elizabeth
. 1981. “The Impact of Victim Assessment on Prosecutors' Screening Decisions: The Case of the New York County District Attorney Office.”Law and Society Review16:225-240.
51.
Sudnow, David
. 1965. “Normal Crimes: Sociological Features of the Penal Code in a Public Defender Office.”Social Problems12:255-277.
52.
Sumner, Christopher
. 1987. “Victim Participation in the Criminal Justice System.”Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology20:195-217.
53.
Sykes, Gresham M.
and David Matza. 1957. “Techniques of Neutralization: A Theory of Delinquency.”American Sociological Review22:664-670.
54.
Victorian Sentencing Committee
. 1988. Sentencing: Report of the Committee. Melbourne, Australia: Attorney-General's Department.
55.
Yin, Robert K.
1984. Case Studies Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
