Recent reforms have expanded the possibilities for gathering and sharing information during juvenile justice processing and have included calls for comprehensive assessments of all juvenile referrals. However, scant attention has been given to questions concerning the timing, goals, or uses of assessments; the structure and goals of intake; or the role of assessments at intake. These questions merit closer investigation because variation in assessment or intake goals and practices will likely constrain the efficiency or efficacy of juvenile processing. Using interview and survey data from a study of county-level intake processes in Texas, this study identifies and discusses their policy implications.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ainsworth, Janet E.1996. “The Court's Effectiveness in Protecting the Rights of Juveniles in Delinquency Cases.”The Future of Children6:64-74.
2.
Babbie, Earl R.
1995. The Practice of Social Research. 7th ed.Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
3.
Beyer, Marty
, Thomas Grisso, and Malcolm Young. 1997. More Than Meets the Eye: Rethinking Assessment, Competency and Sentencing for a Harsher Era of Juvenile Justice. Washington, DC: American Bar Association Juvenile Justice Center.
4.
Bilchik, Shay
. 1998. Mental Health Disorders and Substance Abuse Problems Among Juveniles. Washington, DC: Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
5.
Butts, Jeffrey A.
and Adele V. Harrell. 1998. Delinquents or Criminals: Policy Options for Young Offenders. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
6.
Champion, Dean J.
1998. The Juvenile Justice System: Delinquency, Processing, and the Law. 2d ed.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
7.
Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
. 1996. Combating Violence and Delinquency: The National Juvenile Justice Action Plan. Washington, DC: Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
8.
Dedel, Kelly
. 1998. “National Profile of the Organization of State Juvenile Corrections Systems.”Crime & Delinquency44:507-525.
9.
Dembo, Richard
and Richard Brown. 1994. “The Hillsborough County Juvenile Assessment Center.”Journal of Child and Adolescent Substance Abuse3:25-43.
10.
Dodge, Douglas C.
1997. Due Process Advocacy. Washington, DC: Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
11.
Edwards, Leonard P.1996. “The Future of the Juvenile Court: Promising New Directions.”The Future of Children6:131-139.
12.
Feld, Barry C.1991. “Justice By Geography: Urban, Suburban, and Rural Variations in Juvenile Justice Administration.”Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology82:156-210.
13.
Feld, Barry C.
1998. “The Juvenile Court.” Pp. 509-541 in The Handbook of Crime and Punishment, edited by M. Tonry. New York: Oxford University Press.
14.
Feld, Barry C.
1999. Bad Kids: Race and the Transformation of the Juvenile Court. New York: Oxford University Press.
15.
Gottfredson, Don C.
1987. “Prediction and Classification in Criminal Justice Decision Making.” Pp. 1-51 in Crime and Justice: An Annual Review of Research, edited by M. Tonry. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
16.
Greenwood, Peter W.1996. “Responding to Juvenile Crime: Lessons Learned.”The Future of Children6:75-85.
17.
Guarino-Ghezzi, Susan
and Edward J. Loughran. 1996. Balancing Juvenile Justice. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
18.
Howell, James C.
, ed. 1995. Guide for Implementing the Comprehensive Strategy for Serious, Violent, and Chronic Juvenile Offenders. Washington, DC: Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
19.
Howell, James C.1996. “Juvenile Transfers to the Criminal Justice System: State of the Art.”Law and Policy18:17-60.
20.
Mears, Daniel P.1998. “Evaluation Issues Confronting Juvenile Justice Sentencing Reforms: A Case Study of Texas.”Crime & Delinquency44:443-463.
21.
National Criminal Justice Association
. 1997. Juvenile Justice Reform Initiatives in the States: 1994-1996. Washington, DC: Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
22.
Puritz, Patricia
, Sue Burrell, Robert Schwartz, Mark Soler, and Loren Warboys. 1995. A Call for Justice: An Assessment of Access to Counsel and Quality of Representation in Delinquency Proceedings. Washington, DC: American Bar Association, Juvenile Justice Center.
23.
Puritz, Patricia
and Wendy Wan Long Shang. 1998. Innovative Approaches to Juvenile Indigent Defense. Washington, DC: Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
24.
Rivers, James E.
, Richard Dembo, and Robert S. Anwyl. 1998. “The Hillsborough County, Florida, Juvenile Assessment Center: A Prototype.”The Prison Journal78:439-450.
25.
Rossi, Peter H.
, Howard E. Freeman, and Mark W. Lipsey. 1999. Evaluation: A Systematic Approach. 6th ed.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
26.
Rubin, Ted H.1996. “The Nature of the Court Today.”The Future of Children6:40-52.
27.
Schwartz, Ira M.
and William H. Barton, eds. 1994. Reforming Juvenile Detention: No More Hidden Closets. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
28.
Sherman, Lawrence W.
, Denise C. Gottfredson, Doris MacKenzie, John Eck, Peter Reuter, and Shawn Bushway, eds. 1997. Preventing Crime: What Works, What Doesn't, What's Promising. Washington, DC: Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
29.
Sickmund, Melissa
. 1997. The Juvenile Delinquency Probation Caseload, 1985-1994. Washington, DC: Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
30.
Sickmund, Melissa
, Anne L. Stahl, Terrence A. Finnegan, Howard N. Snyder, Rowen S. Poole, and Jeffrey A. Butts. 1998. Juvenile Court Statistics 1995. Washington, DC: Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
31.
Singer, Simon I.1996. “Merging and Emerging Systems of Juvenile and Criminal Justice.”Law and Policy18:1-15.
32.
Snyder, Howard N.
and Melissa Sickmund. 1996. Juvenile Offenders and Victims: A National Report. Washington, DC: Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
33.
Texas Criminal Justice Policy Council
. 1998. An Overview of Texas Juvenile Justice Population Trends and Dynamics. Austin: State of Texas.
34.
Texas Criminal Justice Policy Council
. 1999a. A Look at Referrals to Selected Juvenile Probation Departments in Texas. Austin: State of Texas.
35.
Texas Criminal Justice Policy Council
. 1999b. An Overview of Juvenile Certification in Texas. Austin: State of Texas.
36.
Torbet, Patricia M.
, Richard Gable, Hunter Hurst IV, Imogene Montgomery, Linda Szymanski, and Douglas Thomas. 1996. State Responses to Serious and Violent Juvenile Crime. Washington, DC: Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
37.
Torbet, Patricia M.
and Linda Szymanski. 1998. State Legislative Responses to Violent Juvenile Crime: 1996-1997 Update. Washington, DC: Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
38.
Towberman, Donna B.1992. “National Survey of Juvenile Needs Assessment.”Crime & Delinquency38:230-238.
39.
U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO)
. 1995a. Juvenile Justice: Minimal Gender Bias Occurred in Processing Noncriminal Juveniles. Washington, DC: General Accounting Office.
40.
U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO)
. 1995b. Representation Rates Varied as Did Counsel's Impact on Court Outcomes. Washington, DC: General Accounting Office.
