Over the past several decades, criminologists have increasingly become involved in discussions of criminal justice policies and policy-making. This essay focuses on a recent, important anthology of essays on criminal justice policy, all centering on “minimizing harm” as an organizing principle. Regrettably, little consensus but much disagreement is apparent in the writings of the criminal justice “experts” who contributed to the volume. The larger message of the book is that much of what we have to say about public policy consists of informed opinions rather than firmly grounded, scientific pronouncements.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Currie, Elliott
. 1985. Confronting Crime. New York: Pantheon.
2.
Currie, Elliott
. 1998. Crime and Punishment in America. New York: Henry Holt.
3.
Gibbons, Don C.
1979. The Criminological Enterprise. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
4.
Gibbons, Don C.1995. “Unfit for Human Consumption: The Problem of Flawed Writing in Criminology and Criminal Justice and What to do About It.”Crime & Delinquency41:246-266.
5.
Gibbons, Don C.1999. “Review Essay: Changing Lawbreakers—What Have We Learned Since the 1950s?”Crime & Delinquency45:272-293.
6.
Moore, Mark H.
1999. “Comment: Early Intervention. Promising Path to Cost-Effective Crime Control, or Primrose Path to Wasteful Social Spending?” Pp. 90-100 in Minimizing Harm, editied by E. L. Rubin. Boulder, CO: Westview.
7.
Rubin, Edward L.
, ed. 1999. Minimizing Harm. Boulder, CO: Westview.
8.
Zimring, Franklin E.
and Gordon Hawkins. 1997. Crime Is Not the Problem. New York: Oxford University Press.
