This study examines the destabilization of determinate sentencing in Florida. In retaining the form but rejecting the substance of the determinate sentencing model, Florida's punishment policy is today an unwieldy mix of the worst features of the indeterminate and the determinate ideologies. The discussion places recent policy changes, including the authorization of extraordinarily wide sentencing ranges and the abolition of appellate review, in the context of Florida's two-decade odyssey with determinate sentencing. The article is based on interviews with policymakers and practitioners, along with a variety of official and unofficial documents. The potential ramifications of other states following Florida's lead are enormous and deserve scrutiny.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allen, Francis A.
1981. The Decline of the Rehabilitative Ideal: Penal Policy and Social Purpose. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
2.
Alschuler, Albert
. 1978. “Sentencing Reform and Prosecutorial Power.”University of Pennsylvania Law Review126:550-577.
3.
Bales, William
and Linda Dees. 1992. “Mandatory Minimum Sentencing in Florida: Past Trends and Future Implications.”Crime & Delinquency38:309-329.
4.
Bureau of Justice Assistance
. 1996. National Assessment of Structured Sentencing. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
5.
Bureau of Justice Statistics
. 1999. Truth in Sentencing in State Prisons. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
6.
Casper, Jonathan
, David Brereton, and David Neal. 1982. The Implementation of the California Determinate Sentencing Laws. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
7.
Clear, Todd
, John Hewitt, and Robert Regoli. 1978. “Discretion and the Determinate Sentence: Its Distribution, Control, and Effect on Time Served.”Crime & Delinquency24:428-445.
8.
Costello v. Dugger, 353 F. Supp. 1324 (1972).
9.
Criminal Justice Estimating Conference. 1994. Final Report of the Criminal Justice Estimating Conference.Tallahassee, FL: Criminal Justice Estimating Conference.
10.
Clear, Todd
. 1997. Final Report of the Criminal Justice Estimating Conference.Tallahassee, FL: Criminal Justice Estimating Conference.
11.
Eaton, O. H.1997. “The Florida Punishment Code: A Return to Law Without Order.”Florida Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers9(4):16-18.
12.
Feeley, Malcolm M.
1983. Court Reform on Trial: Why Simple Solutions Fail. New York: Basic Books.
13.
Florida Department of Corrections
. 1992. Florida's Prison System: Capacity and Policy Crisis. Tallahassee: Florida Department of Corrections.
14.
Florida Department of Corrections
. 1997. Sentencing Guidelines 1995-96: Impact of the 1994 and 1995 Structured Sentencing Policies in Florida. Tallahassee: Florida Department of Corrections.
15.
Florida Department of Corrections
. 1998. Historical Summary of Sentencing and Punishment in Florida. Tallahassee: Florida Department of Corrections.
16.
Florida Parole
and Probation Commission. 1983. Florida Parole and Probation Commission Annual Report, 1982-83. Tallahassee: Florida Parole and Probation Commission.
17.
Florida Public Defender Association
. 1997. Memo of May 13, 1997 to Governor Lawton Chiles. Tallahassee: Florida Public Defender Association.
18.
Frankel, Marvin
. 1972. Criminal Sentences: Law Without Order. New York: Hill and Wang.
19.
Frase, Richard
. 1995. “State Sentencing Guidelines: Still Going Strong.”Judicature78(4): 173-179.
20.
Friedman, Lawrence
. 1993. Crime and Punishment in American History. New York: Basic Books.
21.
Griset, Pamala
. 1996. “Determinate Sentencing and Administrative Discretion Over Time Served in Prison: A Case Study of Florida.”Crime & Delinquency42:127-143.
22.
Griswold, David
. 1985. “Florida's Sentencing Guidelines: Progression or Regression?”Federal Probation49:25-32.
23.
Handberg, Roger
and N. Gary Holton. 1993. Reforming Florida's Sentencing Guidelines: Balancing Equity, Justice, and Public Safety. Dubuque, IA: Kendell-Hunt.
24.
House Committee on Criminal Justice
. 1995. Florida's Criminal Justice System: What Shapes Policy? What Would Enhance Accountability?Tallahassee, FL: House Committee on Criminal Justice.
25.
Joint Legislative Management Committee, Economic and Demographic Research Joint Legislative Management Committee, Economic and Demographic Research Division
. 1992. An Empirical Examination of the Application of Florida's Habitual Offender Statute. Tallahassee, FL: Joint Legislative Management Committee, Economic and Demographic Research Division.
26.
Joint Legislative Management Committee, Economic and Demographic Research Joint Legislative Management Committee, Economic and Demographic Research Division
. 1997. Economic Information for Members and Staff. Tallahassee, FL: Joint Legislative Management Committee, Economic and Demographic Research Division.
27.
Messinger, Sheldon
and Phillip Johnson. 1977. “California's Determinate Sentencing Statute: History and Issues.” Pp. 13-58 in Determinate Sentencing: Reform or Regression? by Special Conference on Determinate Sentencing. Washington, DC: National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice.
28.
Orlando Sentinel. 1995. March 16, p. C-5.
29.
Plante, Kenneth
, Gordon Abernathy, William Salokar, and Richard Kern. 1981. “Judicial Sentencing—Help Is on the Way.”Florida Bar Journal55:536-540.
30.
Rothman, David
. 1994. “The Crime of Punishment.”New York Review of Books. February 17:34-38.
31.
Savelsberg, Joachim J.1992. “Law That Does Not Fit Society: Sentencing Guidelines as a Neoclassical Reaction to the Dilemmas of Substantivized Law.”American Journal of Sociology97:1346-1381.
32.
Stolzenberg, Lisa
and Stewart D'Alessio. 1994. “Sentencing and Unwarranted Disparity: An Empirical Assessment of the Long-Term Impact of Sentencing Guidelines in Minnesota.”Criminology32:301-310.
33.
Sundberg, Alan
, Kenneth Plante, and Donna Brazier. 1983. “Florida's Initial Experience with Sentencing Guidelines.”Florida State University Law Review11:125-151.
34.
Tonry, Michael
. 1988. “Structuring Sentencing.” Pp. 267-337 in Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, edited by M. Tonry and N. Morris. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35.
Tonry, Michael
. 1996. Sentencing Matters. New York: Oxford University Press.
36.
Von Hirsch, Andrew
and Kathleen Hanrahan. 1981. “Determinate Penalty Systems in America: An Overview.”Crime & Delinquency27:289-316.
37.
Walker, Samuel
. 1993. Taming the System: The Control of Discretion in Criminal Justice 1950-1990. New York: Oxford University Press.
38.
Wilson, James Q.
1975. Thinking About Crime. New York: Bantam Books.
