“Hotbeds of Crime?” Crime and Public Housing in Urban Sydney

Abstract

Public housing estates in Britain, the United States, and Australia are frequently plagued by crime problems. In Australia at least, policy debate about how to address these problems has been dominated by the view that public housing design influences crime by controlling the supply of opportunities for offending (the design hypothesis). An alternate and less frequently considered possibility is that public housing estates experience persistent crime problems simply because crime-prone individuals are (by reason of their economic and social disadvantage) more likely to be allocated to public housing (the allocation hypothesis). This article reports the results of research designed to test the two hypotheses. The results support the allocation hypothesis.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Belknap, J. 1989. “The Economics-Crime Link.” Criminal Justice Abstracts March: 140-157.

Bottoms, A. E. , Claytor, A. , and Wiles, P. 1992. “Housing Markets and Residential Community Crime Careers: A Case Study From Sheffield.” Pp. 118-144 in Crime, Policing and Place: Essays in Environmental Criminology, edited by D. J. Evans , N. R. Fyfe , and D. T. Herbert . London: Routledge.

Bottoms, A. E. and Wiles, P. 1986. “Housing Tenure and Residential Community Crime Careers in Britain.” Pp. 101-162 in Communities and Crime, edited by A. J. Reiss Jr. and M. Tonry . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Box, S. 1987. Recession, Crime and Punishment. London: Macmillan.

Bynum, T. and Purri, D. 1984. “Crime and Architectural Style: An Examination of the Environmental Design Hypothesis.” Criminal Justice and Behavior 11:179-196.

Chiricos, T. 1987. “Rates of Crime and Unemployment: An Analysis of Aggregate Research Evidence.” Social Problems 34:187-212.

Devery, C. 1991. Disadvantage and Crime. Sydney, Australia: New South Wales Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research.

Gregory, R. and Hunter, B. 1996. Spatial Trends in Income and Employment in Australian Cities: A Report to the Commonwealth Department of Transport and Regional Development. Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth Department of Transport and Regional Development.

Matka, E. 1997. Public Housing and Crime in Sydney. Sydney, Australia: New South Wales Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research.

10.

Newman, O. 1972. Defensible Space: Crime Prevention Through Urban Design. New York: Macmillan.

11.

New South Wales Department of Housing . 1996. Crime Prevention, Public Housing and People. New South Wales, Australia: New South Wales Department of Housing.

12.

Pyle, G. F. 1976. “Spatial and Temporal Aspects of Crime in Cleveland, Ohio.” American Behavioral Scientist 20:175-197.

13.

Rubenstein, H. , Motoyama, T. , and Hartjens, P. 1980. “Defensible Space: Crime Prevention Through Urban Design and Architectural Design for Crime Prevention (A Methodological Review).” Pp. C133-C158 in Link Between Crime and the Built Environment: Volume 2, edited by T. Motoyama , H. Rubenstein , and P. Hartjens . Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.

14.

Skogan, W. G. 1990. Disorder and Decline: Crime and the Spiral of Decay in American Neighborhoods. New York: Free Press.

15.

Weatherburn, D. and Lind, B. 1997. Social and Economic Stress, Child Neglect and Juvenile Delinquency. Sydney, Australia: New South Wales Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research.

16.

Wikstrom, P. H. 1989. Housing and Offending: The Relationship at the Individual Level in Childhood and Youth, Project Metropolitan Research Report No. 27. Stockholm: Department of Sociology, Stockholm University.