In 1996, the Dallas Police Department began an anti-gang initiative that was designed to reduce gang violence. Five defined target areas that were home to seven of the city's most violent gangs received overtime-funded officers to implement several different enforcement strategies. The strategies included saturation patrol and aggressive curfew and truancy enforcement. Control areas were selected, and preintervention and postintervention measures of gang violence and offenses that were reported to the police were analyzed. The findings indicated that aggressive curfew and truancy enforcement led to significant reductions in gang violence, whereas simple saturation patrol did not. In addition, there were no significant reductions in offenses reported to the police. The significance of these findings and policy implications is discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abrahamse, Allan F.
, Patricia A. Ebener, Peter W. Greenwood, Nora Fitzgerald, and Thomas E. Kosin. 1991. “An Experimental Evaluation of the Phoenix Repeat Offender Program.”Justice Quarterly8:141-172.
2.
Bureau of Justice Assistance
. 1997. Urban Street Gang Enforcement. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
3.
Caeti, Tory J.
1997. “Who's Killing Our Kids? An Analysis of Juvenile Homicide Victims in Dallas 1993-1997.”Research Initiation Grant Project, University of North Texas, Denton.
4.
Caeti, Tory J.
, Eric J. Fritsch, and Craig Hemmens. 1995. “Bangin' in the Legislature: A Comparison of State Statutory Responses to Gangs.” Presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Boston.
5.
Click, Benjamin R.1994. “Statistics in Dallas Encouraging.”Police Chief61 (12):33-36.
6.
Curry, G. David
, Richard A. Ball, and Scott H. Decker. 1996. “Estimating the National Scope of Gang Crime From Law Enforcement Data.”National Institute of Justice: Research in Brief.
7.
Dart, Robert W.1992. “Chicago's `Flying Squad' Tackles Street Gangs.”Police Chief59:96-98.
8.
Freed, David
. 1986. “Policing Gangs: Case of Contrasting Styles.” Pp. 288-291 in The Modern Gang Reader, edited by M. W. Klein, C. L. Maxson, and J. Miller. Los Angeles: Roxbury.
9.
Friend, Charles E.1994. “Juvenile Curfew.”Policy Review6:1-4.
10.
Garrett, Dennis A.
and David Brewster. 1994. “Curfew: A New Look at an Old Tool.”Police Chief (December):29-61.
11.
Garry, Eileen M.1996. “Truancy: First Step to a Lifetime of Problems.”Juvenile Justice Bulletin (October).
12.
Hoover, Larry T.
and Tory J. Caeti. 1994. “Crime-Specific Policing in Houston.”Texas Law Enforcement Management and Administrative Statistics Program Bulletin1 (9).
13.
Houston, James
. 1996. “What Works: The Search for Excellence in Gang Intervention Programs.”Journal of Gang Research3:1-16.
14.
Howell, James C.
1996. Youth Gang Violence Prevention and Intervention: What Works. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
15.
Huff, C. Ronald
and Wesley D. McBride. 1993. “Gangs and the Police.” Pp. 401-416 in The Gang Intervention Handbook, edited by A. P. Goldstein and C. R. Huff. Champaign, IL: Research Press.
16.
Hunt, A. Lee
and Ken Weiner. 1977. “The Impact of a Juvenile Curfew: Suppression and Displacement in Patterns of Juvenile Offenses.”Journal of Police Science and Administration5:407-412.
17.
Jackson, Robert K.
and Wesley D. McBride. 1996. Understanding Street Gangs. Incline Village, NV: Copperhouse.
18.
Johnson, Claire M.
, Barbara A. Webster, Edward F. Connors, and Diana J. Saenz. 1995. “Gang Enforcement Problems and Strategies: National Survey Findings.”Journal of Gang Research3:1-18.
19.
“Juvenile Curfews and Gang Violence: Exiled on Main Street.”1994. Harvard Law Review107 (7):1693-1710.
20.
Kelling, George L.1978. “Police Field Services and Crime: The Presumed Effects of a Capacity.”Crime & Delinquency24:173-184.
21.
Kelling, George L.
1996. “Defining the Bottom Line in Policing: Organizational Philosophy and Accountability.” Pp. 23-36 in Quantifying Quality in Policing, edited by L. T. Hoover. Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum.
22.
Kent, Douglas R.
and Peggy Smith. 1994. “The Tri-Agency Resource Gang Enforcement Team: A Selective Approach to Reduce Gang Crime.” Pp. 292-296 in The Modern Gang Reader, edited by M. W. Klein, C. L. Maxson, and J. Miller. Los Angeles: Roxbury.
23.
Klein, Malcolm W.
1993. “Attempting Gang Control by Suppression: The Misuse of Deterrence Principles.” Pp. 304-313 in The Modern Gang Reader, edited by M. W. Klein, C. L. Maxson, and J. Miller. Los Angeles: Roxbury.
24.
Klein, Malcolm W.
1995. The American Street Gang: Its Nature, Prevalence, and Control. New York: Oxford University Press.
25.
Knox, George W.
1994. An Introduction to Gangs. Bristol, IN: Wyndham Hall.
26.
LeBoeuf, Donni
. 1996. Curfew: An Answer to Juvenile Delinquency and Victimization?Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
27.
Martin, Joe R.
, Arnie D. Schulze, and Mike Valdez. 1988. “Taking Aim at Truancy.”FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin57:8-12.
28.
Martin, Susan E.1986. “Policing Career Criminals: An Examination of an Innovative Crime Control Program.”Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology77:1159-1182.
29.
Martin, Susan E.
and Lawrence W. Sherman. 1986. “Catching Career Criminals: Proactive Policing and Selective Apprehension.”Justice Quarterly3:171-192.
30.
Needle, Jerome A.
and W. V. Stapleton. 1983. Police Handling of Youth Gangs. Washington, DC: American Justice Institute, National Juvenile Justice System Assessment Center.
31.
Owens, Robert P.
and Donna K. Wells. 1993. “One City's Response to Gangs.”Police Chief58:25-27.
32.
Palumbo, Dennis J.
, R. Eskay, and Michael A. Hallett. 1992. Do Gang Prevention Strategies Actually Reduce Crime?Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
33.
Rohrman, Doug
. 1993. Combating Truancy in Our Schools: A Community Effort. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
34.
Ruefle, William
and Kenneth Mike Reynolds. 1995. “Curfews and Delinquency in Major American Cities.”Crime & Delinquency41:347-363.
35.
Rush, Jeffrey P.
1996. “The Police Role in Dealing With Gangs.” Pp. 85-92 in Gangs: A Criminal Justice Approach, edited by J. M. Miller and J. P. Rush. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
36.
Shelden, Randall G.
, Sharon K. Tracy, and William B. Brown. 1997. Youth Gangs in American Society. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
37.
Shelden, Randall G.
, Sharon K. Tracy, and William B. Brown. 1990a. “Police Crackdowns.”National Institute of Justice Reports (March/April).
38.
Sherman, Lawrence W.1990b. “Police Crackdowns: Initial and Residual Deterrence.”Crime and Justice: A Review of Research12:1-48.
39.
Sherman, Lawrence W.
1992. “Attacking Crime: Police and Crime Control.” Pp. 159-230 in Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, vol. 14, edited by M. Tonry and N. Morris. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
40.
Sherman, Lawrence W.
, James W. Shaw, and Dennis P. Rogan. 1995. “The Kansas City Gun Experiment.”National Institute of Justice: Research in Brief.
41.
Spergel, Irving A.
1995. The Youth Gang Problem. New York: Oxford University Press.
42.
Spergel, Irving A.
and G. David Curry. 1990. “Strategies and Perceived Agency Effectiveness in Dealing With the Youth Gang Problem.” Pp. 288-309 in Gangs in America, edited by C. R. Huff. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
43.
Spergel, Irving A.
, David Curry, Ron Chance, Candice Kane, Ruth Ross, Alba Alexander, Edwina Simmons, and Sandra Oh. 1994. Gang Suppression and Intervention: Problem and Response. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
44.
Thurman, Quint C.
, Andrew L. Giacomazzi, Michael D. Reisig, and David G. Mueller. 1996. “Community-Based Gang Prevention and Intervention: An Evaluation of the Neutral Zone.”Crime & Delinquency42:279-295.
Weisel, Deborah L.
and Ellen Painter. 1997. The Police Response to Gangs: Case Studies of Five Cities. Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum.
47.
Weston, Jim
. 1993. “Community Policing: An Approach to Youth Gangs in a Medium-Sized City.”Police Chief60 (August):80-84.
48.
Wilson, James Q.
and George L. Kelling. 1989. “Making Neighborhoods Safe.”Atlantic Monthly (February):46-52.
