This article summarizes findings from a national study on promising correctional programs for women offenders. Information is provided about program characteristics that experts identify as predictive of positive outcomes. Similarities among correctional experts' and program participants' responses included characteristics of staff and individualized programming. Differences in perceptions of elements contributing to successful outcomes also were found. State-level administrators attributed success to methods of program operations, whereas prison administrators attributed success to treatments addressing multiple treatment needs. Results are relevant to program design, program implementation, and the generation of hypotheses linking program elements to outcomes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Correctional Association
. 1990. The Female Offender: What Does the Future Hold?Laurel, MD: American Correctional Association.
2.
American Correctional Association
. 1993. Directory of Juvenile and Adult Correctional Departments, Institutions, Agencies, and Paroling Authorities. Laurel, MD: American Correctional Association.
3.
Andrews, Don A.
, James Bonta, and Robert D. Hoge. 1990. “Classification for Effective Rehabilitation: Rediscovering Psychology.”Criminal Justice and Behavior17:19-52.
4.
Andrews, Don A.
and Jerry J. Kiessling. 1980. “Program Structure and Effective Correctional Practices: A Summary of the CaVIC Research.” Pp. 441-463 in Effective Correctional Treatment, edited by Robert R. Ross and Paul Gendreau. Toronto: Butterworths.
5.
Andrews, Don A.
, Ivan Zinger, Robert D. Hoge, James Bonta, Paul Gendreau, and Francis T. Cullen. 1990. “Does Correctional Treatment Work? Clinically Relevant and Psychologically Informed Meta-Analysis.”Criminology28:369-404.
6.
Austin, James
, Barbara Bloom, and Trish Donahue. 1992. Female Offenders in the Community: An Analysis of Innovative Strategies and Programs. Washington, DC: National Institute of Corrections.
7.
Bloom, Barbara
. 1993. “Incarcerated Mothers and Their Children: Maintaining Family Ties.” Pp. 60-68 in Female Offenders: Meeting Needs of a Neglected Population, edited by the American Correctional Association. Laurel, MD: American Correctional Association.
8.
Bloom, Barbara
, Eileen Leonard, and Barbara Owen. 1994. “Profiling the Needs of California's Female Prisoners: An Overview of Prison Programs.” Paper presented at the American Society of Criminology Annual Meeting, November, Miami, Florida.
9.
Brett, Crista
. 1993. “From Victim to Victimizer.” Pp. 26-30 in Female Offenders: Meeting Needs of a Neglected Population, edited by the American Correctional Association. Laurel, MD: American Correctional Association.
10.
Bureau of Justice Statistics
. 1991. Women in Prison. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
11.
Bureau of Justice Statistics
.1995. Women in Prison. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
12.
Carp, Scarlett V.
and Linda S. Schade. 1993. “Tailoring Facility Programming to Suit Female Offenders' Needs.” Pp. 37-42 in Female Offenders: Meeting Needs of a Neglected Population, edited by the American Correctional Association. Laurel, MD: American Correctional Association.
Cullen, Francis T.
and Paul Gendreau. 1989. “The Effectiveness of Correctional Rehabilitation: Reconsidering the `Nothing Works' Debate.” Pp. 23-44 in The American Prison: Issues in Research and Policy, edited by L. Goddstein and D. L. MacKenzie. New York: Plenum.
15.
Daly, Kathleen
. 1987. “Survey Results of the Niantic Interviews December 1983 and May 1986.”Mimeo, Yale University.
16.
Dobash, Russell
, Rebecca Dobash, and Sue Gutteridge. 1986. The Imprisonment of Women. New York: Basil Blackwell.
17.
Eaton, Mary
. 1993. Women After Prison. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
18.
Gendreau, Paul
. 1996. “The Principles of Effective Intervention With Offenders.” Pp. 117-130 in Choosing Correctional Options That Work, edited by A. T. Harland. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19.
Gendreau, Paul
and Robert R. Ross. 1987. “Revivification of Rehabilitation: Evidence From the 1980s.”Justice Quarterly4:349-407.
20.
Hagan, Frank E.
1993. Research Methods in Criminal Justice and Criminology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
21.
Hufft, Anita G.
, Lena Sue Fawkes, and W. Travis Lawson. 1993. “Care of the Pregnant Offender.” Pp. 54-59 in Female Offenders: Meeting Needs of a Neglected Population, edited by the American Correctional Association. Laurel, MD: American Correctional Association.
22.
Izzo, Rhena L.
and Robert R. Ross. 1990. “Meta-Analysis of Rehabilitation Programs for Juvenile Delinquents.”Criminal Justice and Behavior17:134-142.
23.
Johnston, Denise
. 1995. “Child Custody Issues of Women Prisoners: A Preliminary Report From the Chicas Project.”Prison Journal75:222-239.
24.
LeClair, D.
1990. The Incarcerated Female Offender: Victim or Villain?Boston: Massachusetts Department of Corrections, Research Division.
25.
Mann, Coramae R.
1984. Female Crime and Delinquency. Montgomery: University of Alabama Press.
26.
Martinson, Robert
. 1974. “What Works? Questions and Answers About Prison Reform.”The Public Interest10:22-54.
27.
Miller, Marsha L.
1990. Perceptions of Available and Needed Programs by Female Offenders in Delaware. Wilmington: Delaware Council on Crime and Justice.
28.
Morash, Merry
, Tim S. Bynum, and Barbara A. Koons. 1995. Findings From the National Study of Innovative and Promising Programs for Women Offenders. East Lansing: Michigan State University, School of Criminal Justice.
29.
Morris, Sylvia K.
and Steven P. Schinke. 1990. “Treatment Needs and Services for Mothers With a Dual Diagnosis: Substance Abuse and Mental Illness.”Journal of Offender Rehabilitation15:65-84.
30.
Moyer, Imogene
. 1984. “Deceptions and Realities of Life in Women's Prisons.”Prison Journal64:45-56.
31.
Oregon Department of Corrections
. 1991. White Paper: Oregon's Women Offenders. Salem: Oregon Department of Corrections.
32.
Owen, Barbara
and Barbara Bloom. 1995. “Profiling Women Prisoners: Findings From National Surveys and a California Sample.”Prison Journal75:165-185.
33.
Palmer, Ted
. 1995. “Programmatic and Nonprogrammatic Aspects of Successful Intervention: New Directions for Research.”Crime & Delinquency41:100-131.
34.
Pollock-Byrne
, Joycelyn M. 1990. Women, Prison, and Crime. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
35.
Rhode Island Justice Alliance
. 1990. “Female Offender Survey, Rhode Island Adult Correctional Institution, Women's Division.”Mimeo.
36.
Ross, Robert R.
and Elizabeth A. Fabiano. 1986. Female Offenders: Correctional Afterthoughts. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.
37.
Ryan, T. E.
1984. Adult Female Offenders and the Institutional Programs: A State of the Art Analysis. Washington, DC: National Institute of Corrections.
38.
Ryan, T. A.
and James B. Grassano. 1993. “Pregnant Offenders: Profile and Special Problems.” Pp. 49-53 in Female Offenders: Meeting Needs of a Neglected Population, edited by the American Correctional Association. Laurel, MD: American Correctional Association.
39.
Shover, Neal
. 1991. “Institutional Corrections: Jails and Prisons.” Pp. 379-397 in Criminology: A Contemporary Handbook, edited by J. F. Shelley. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
40.
Showers, Jacy
. 1993. “Assessing and Remedying Parenting Knowledge Among Women Inmates.”Journal of Offender Rehabilitation20:35-45.
41.
Smart, Carol
. 1977. Women, Crime and Criminology: A Feminist Critique. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
42.
Weisheit, Ralph
and Sue Mahan. 1988. Women, Crime and Criminal Justice. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
