This article analyzes the theoretical principles of the recently legislated “three strikes and you're out” laws. In many respects, these are related to the “new penology” that shifted the focus of criminological and penological interest from the individual offender toward the control of aggregates. Furthermore, the analysis relates the three-strikes measures to the cultural model of the “McDonaldization” of society in which the principles of the fast-food restaurant dominate many aspects of American society. These principles include efficiency, calculability, predictability, and control mainly by non-human technology. The analysis in this article, which focuses especially on the three-strikes law in California, suggests that three-strikes laws can be viewed as a part of the McDonaldization trend.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abrahamson, Alan
and Davan Maharaj. 1996. “O.C. Judges Hail Change in Their Role.”Los Angeles Times, June 21: A1, A22.
2.
Alschuler, Albert W.
1990. “The Failure of Sentencing Commissions.” Paper presented at the “Conference of Growth and Its Influence on Correctional Policy: Perspectives on the Report of the Blue Ribbon Commission,”University of California, Berkeley, May.
3.
Benekos, Peter J.
and Alida V. Merlo. 1995. “Three Strikes and You're Out! The Political Sentencing Game.”Federal Probation59 (1): 3-9.
4.
Blumstein, Alfred
. 1993. “Making Rationality Relevant: The American Society of Criminology 1992 Presidential Address.”Criminology31:1-16.
5.
Blumstein, Alfred
, Jaqueline Cohen, Susan E. Martin, and Michael H. Tonry. 1983. Research on Sentencing. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
6.
Bonger, Willem
. [1916] 1969. Criminality and Economic Conditions. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
7.
Bottoms, Anthony E.
1980. “An Introduction to `The Coming Crisis'.” Pp. 1-24 in The Coming Penal Crisis, edited by A. E. Bottoms and R. H. Preston. Edinburgh, UK: Scottish Academic Press.
8.
“California Judge Refuses to Apply a Tough New Sentencing Law.”1994. The New York Times, September 20: A9.
9.
California Legislative Analyst's Office
. 1995a. Status: Accommodating Prison Population Growth. Sacramento: California Legislative Analyst's Office.
10.
California Legislative Analyst's Office
. 1995b. Status: The “Three Strikes and You're Out” Law—A Preliminary Assesment. Sacramento: California Legislative Analyst's Office.
11.
Chirot, Daniel
. 1994. How Societies Change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge.
12.
Cohen, Stanley
. 1973. Folk Devils and Moral Panics. St. Albans, UK: Paladin.
13.
Cohen, Stanley
. 1985. Visions of Social Control. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
14.
Colvin, Richard Lee
and Ted Rohrlich. 1994. “Courts Toss Curves at `3 Strikes'.”Los Angeles Times, October 23: A1, A40-A43.
15.
Cushman, Robert C.
1996. “Effect on a Local Criminal Justice System.” Pp. 90-113 in Three Strikes and You're Out: Vengeance as Public Policy, edited by D. Shichor and D. K. Sechrest. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16.
Dixon, Jo.1995. “The Organizational Context of Criminal Sentencing.”American Journal of Sociology5:1157-1198.
17.
Dolan, Maura
and Tony Perry. 1996. “Justices Deal Blow to `3 Strikes'.”Los Angeles Times, June 21: A1, A22.
18.
Donziger, Steven R.
1996. The Real War on Crime; The Report of the National Criminal Justice Commission. New York: Harper & Row.
19.
Farrington, David P.
1987. “Predicting Individual Crime Rates.” Pp. 53-101 in Prediction and Classification: Criminal Justice Decision Making, edited by D. M. Gottfredson and M. Tonry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20.
Fattah, Ezzat A.
1986. From Crime Policy to Victim Policy: Reorienting the Justice System. London: Macmillan.
21.
Feeley, Malcolm M.
and Sam Kamin. 1996. “The Effects of `Three Strikes and You're Out' on the Courts: Looking Back to See the Future.” Pp. 135-154 in Three Strikes and You're Out: Vengeance as Public Policy, edited by D. Shichor and D. K. Sechrest. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
Feeley, Malcolm M.
and Jonathan Simon. 1992. “The New Penology: Notes on the Emerging Strategy of Corrections and Its Implications.”Criminology30:449-474.
23.
Forst, Brian
. 1983. “Prosecution and Sentencing.” Pp. 165-182 in Crime and Public Policy, edited by J. Q. Wilson. San Francisco: ICS Press.
24.
Foucault, Michel
. 1977. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Random House.
25.
Garland, David
. 1990. Punishment in Modern Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26.
Garland, David
. 1991. “Punishment and Culture: The Symbolic Dimension of Criminal Justice.” Pp. 191-222 in Studies in Law, Politics, and Society, vol. 11, edited by A. Sarat and S. S. Sibley. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
27.
Geis, Gilbert
. 1996. “A Base on Balls for White-Collar Criminals.” Pp. 244-264 in Three Strikes and You're Out: Vengeance as Public Policy, edited by D. Shichor and D. K. Sechrest. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28.
Goode, Erich
and Nachman Ben-Yehuda. 1994. Moral Panics: The Social Construction of Deviance. Cambridge, UK: Blackwell.
29.
Goodstein, Lynne
and John Hepburn. 1985. Determinate Sentencing and Imprisonment: A Failure of Reform. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
30.
Gottfredson, Don M.
1987. “Prediction and Classification in Criminal Justice Decision Making.” Pp. 1-20 in Prediction and Classification: Criminal Justice Decision Making, edited by D. M. Gottfredson and M. Tonry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31.
Gottfredson, Michael R.
and Travis Hirschi. 1987. Positive Criminology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
32.
Gottfredson, Michael R.
and Travis Hirschi. 1990. A General Theory of Crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
33.
Greenwood, Peter W.
, C. Peter Rydell, Allan F. Abrahamse, Jonathan P. Caulkins, James Chiesa, Karyn E. Model, and Stephen P. Klein. 1994. Three Strikes and You're Out: Estimated Benefits and Costs of California's New Mandatory Sentencing Law. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
34.
Haas, Kenneth C.1994. “The Triumph of Vengeance Over Retribution: The United States Supreme Court and the Death Penalty.”Crime, Law and Social Change21:127-154.
35.
Hagan, John
. 1995. “Rethinking Crime Theory and Policy: The New Sociology of Crime and Disrepute.” Pp. 29-42 in Crime and Public Policy: Putting Theory to Work, edited by H. D. Barlow. Boulder, CO: Westview.
36.
Henry, Stuart
and Dragan Milovanovic. 1996. Constitutive Criminology: Beyond Postmodernism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37.
Ingram, Carl
. 1995. “Overall State Crime Rate Drops 7.2%, Lundgren Says.”Los Angeles Times, May 13: A16.
38.
Irwin, John
and James Austin. 1994. It Is About Time: America's Imprisonment Binge. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
39.
Kramer, John H.
and Jeffery T. Ulmer. 1996. “Sentencing Disparity and Departures From Guidelines.”Justice Quarterly13:81-105.
40.
Kuisel, Richard
. 1993. Seducing the French: The Dilemma of Americanization. Berkeley: University of California Press.
41.
Lewis, Neal A.1994. “President Foresees Safer U.S.: Others See Crime Bill as Symbolic.”The New York Times, August 27: 6.
42.
Lindner, Charles L.1995. “Commit a Misdemeanor—Don't Worry About Jail.”Los Angeles Times, May 7: M1.
43.
Martinson, Robert M.1974. “What Works? Questions and Answers About Prison Reform.”The Public Interest35:22-54.
44.
Mauer, Marc
. 1994. “Three Strikes and You're Out.”Testimony before the House Judiciary Committee, Subcommittee on Crime and Criminal Justice, Washington, DC, March 1.
45.
McCarthy, Nancy
. 1995. “A Year Later, `3 Strikes' Clogs Jails, Slows Trials.”California Bar Journal, March: 1, 6-7.
46.
Merianos, Dorothy E.
, James W. Marquart, Kelly Damphouse, and Jaime L. Herbert. 1997. “From the Outside In: Using Public Health Data to Make Inferences About Older Inmates.”Crime & Delinquency43:298-313.
47.
Morris, Norval
and Michael Tonry. 1990. Between Prison and Probation: Intermediate Punishment in a Rational Sentencing System. New York: Oxford University Press.
48.
National Council on Crime
and Delinquency. 1994. The Aging of California's Prison Population: An Assessment of the Three Strikes Legislation. San Francisco: NCCD.
49.
O'Connell
, John P., Jr.1995. “Throwing Away the Key (and State Money).”Spectrum, Winter: 28-31.
50.
Ritzer, George
. 1993. The McDonaldization of Society. Newbury Park, CA: Pine Forge.
51.
Rothman, David J.
1971. The Discovery of the Asylum: Social Order and Disorder in the New Republic. Boston: Little, Brown.
52.
Saint-Germain, Michelle A.
and Robert A. Calamia. 1996. “Three Strikes and You're In: A Streams and Windows Model Incremental Policy Change.”Journal of Criminal Justice24:57-70.
53.
Sanders, Clinton R.
and Eleanor Lyon. 1995. “Repetitive Retribution: Media Images and the Cultural Construction of Criminal Justice.” Pp. 25-44 in Cultural Criminology, edited by J. Ferrell and C. R. Sanders. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
54.
Savelsberg, Joachim J.1992. “Law That Does Not Fit Society: Sentencing Guidelines as a Neoclassical Reaction to the Dilemmas of Substantivized Law.”American Journal of Sociology97:1346-1381.
55.
Shichor, David
. 1987. “Penal Policies: Some Recent Trends.”Legal Studies Forum11:55-78.
56.
Shichor, David
and Solomon Kobrin. 1978. “Criminal Behavior Among the Elderly: A Survey of the Arrest Statistics.”The Gerentologist18:213-218.
57.
Shichor, David
and Dale K. Sechrest. 1996. “Three Strikes as Public Policy: Future Implications.” Pp. 265-277 in Three Strikes and You're Out: Vengeance as Public Policy, edited by D. Shichor and D. K. Sechrest. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
58.
Simon, Jonathan
. 1988. “The Ideological Effects of Actuarial Practices.”Law and Society Review22:771-800.
59.
Simon, Jonathan
. 1993. “From Confinement to Waste Management: The Postmodernization of Social Control.”Focus on Law8 (2): 4, 6-7.
60.
Simon, Jonathan
and Malcolm M. Feeley. 1994. “True Crime: The New Penology and Public Discourse on Crime.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Miami, FL, November.
61.
Slater, Eric
. 1995. “Pizza Thief Gets 25 Years to Life Term.”Los Angeles Times, March 3: B14.
62.
Spiegel, Claire
. 1994. “3 Strikes Has Escape Loophole.”Los Angeles Times, October 24: A3, A14-A15.
63.
Stryker, Robin
. 1989. “Limits on Technocratization of the Law: The Elimination of the National Labor Relations Board's Division of Economic Research.”American Sociological Review54:341-358.
64.
Surette, Ray
. 1996. “News From Nowhere, Policy Will Follow: Media and the Social Construction of `Three Strikes and You're Out'.” Pp. 177-202 in Three Strikes and You're Out: Vengeance as Public Policy, edited by D. Shichor and D. K. Sechrest. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
65.
Sutton, John R.1987. “Doing Time.”American Sociological Review52:612-630.
66.
Tobias, John J.
1972. Crime and Industrial Society in the Nineteenth Century. London: Penguin.
67.
Tonry, Michael
. 1996. Sentencing Matters. New York: Oxford University Press.
68.
Turner, Michael G.
, Jody L. Sundt, Brandon K. Applegate, and Francis T. Cullen. 1995. “ `Three Strikes and You're Out' Legislation: A National Assessment.”Federal Probation59 (3): 16-35.
69.
Van den Haag, Ernest
. 1975. Punishing Criminals: Concerning a Very Old and Painful Question. New York: Basic Books.
70.
Visher, Christy A.1987. “Incapacitation and Crime Control: Does a `Lock'em Up' Strategy Reduce Crime?”Justice Quarterly4:513-543.
71.
Weber, Max
. 1968. Economy and Society. Totowa, NJ: Bedminster.
72.
Wilson, William J.
1987. The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
73.
Zeigler, Frank A.
and Rolando V. Del Carmen. 1996. “Constitutional Issues Arising From `Three Strikes and You're Out' Legislation.” Pp. 3-23 in Three Strikes and You're Out: Vengeance as Public Policy, edited by D. Shichor and D. K. Sechrest. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
74.
Zimring, Franklin E.
and Gordon Hawkins. 1991. The Scale of Imprisonment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
