The ignition interlock has been touted as a “high-tech” intervention to reduce drunk-driving recidivism. However, it has been difficult to evaluate because outcomes may be a result of program selection. In the study reported here, a random sample of interlock cases was contrasted against a comparison group of impaired drivers in a retrospective analysis. Program effects were tested through a series of logit regressions, and program and comparison group drunk-driving survival rates were also compared. Program participants had lower recidivism rates and higher survival rates, indicating that the program has strong potential to protect the public and to change offender behavior.
Beerman, Kathy
, Margaret Smith, and Roberta Hall. 1988. “Predictors of Recidivism in DUI's.”Journal of Studies in Alcohol49:443-449.
3.
EMT Group, Inc.
1990. Evaluation of the California Ignition Interlock Pilot Program for DUI Offenders (Farr-Davis Driver Safety Act of 1986). Final report prepared for the California Department of Alcohol and Drug Program and the California Office of Traffic Safety. Sacramento, CA: Author.
4.
Evans, Leonard
and Paul Wasielewski1983. “Risky Driving Related to Driver and Vehicle Characteristics.”Accident Analysis and Prevention2:121-136.
5.
Fitzpatrick, Jody
. 1992. “Problems in the Evaluation of Treatment Programs for Drunk Drivers: Goals and Outcomes.”Journal of Drug Issues1:155-167.
6.
Gottfredson, Michael R.
and Travis Hirschi. 1990. A General Theory of Crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
7.
Gould, Larry A.
and Kristin Gould. 1992. “First-Time and Multiple-DWI Offenders: A Comparison of Criminal History Records and BAC Levels.”Journal of Criminal Justice20:527-539.
8.
Hedlund, James
and James Fell. 1995. “Persistent Drinking Drivers in the U.S.” Pp. 1-11 in the 39th Annual Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. Chicago, IL: Transportation Research Board.
9.
Hemenway, David
and Sara Solnick. 1993. “Fuzzy Dice, Dream Cars, and Indecent Gestures: Correlates of Driver Behavior?”Accident Analysis and Prevention25:161-170.
10.
Jonah, Brian
. 1990. “Psychosocial Characteristics of Impaired Drivers: An Integrated Review in Relation to Problem Behaviour Theory.” Pp. 13-41 in Drinking and Driving: Advances in Research and Prevention, edited by R. J. Wilson and R. E. Mann. New York: Guilford.
11.
Jones, Barnie
. 1992. “The Effectiveness of Oregon's Ignition Interlock Program.” Pp. 1460-1465 in Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Alcohol Drugs and Traffic Safety T-92, edited by H. D. Utzelmann, G. Berghaus, and G. Kroj. Cologne, Germany: Verlag.
12.
Jones, Ralph
, John H. Lacey, and James M. Byrne. 1995. “Evaluating Alternative Sanctions for Multiple-Offender DWIS—A Description of Some Prior and Current Research.”National Council of Research, Traffic Research Board. Circular437:60-63.
13.
Keane, Carl
, Paul Maxim, and James Teevan. 1993. “Drinking and Driving, Self-Control, and Gender: Testing a General Theory of Crime.”Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency30:30-46.
14.
Langworthy, Robert
and Edward Latessa. 1993. “Treatment of Chronic Drunk Drivers: The Turning Point Project.”Journal of Criminal Justice21:265-276.
15.
Lilly, J. Robert
, Richard A. Ball, G.David Curry, and John McMullen. 1993. “Electronic Monitoring of the Drunk Driver: A Seven-year Study of the Home Confinement Alternative.”Crime and Delinquency39:462-484.
16.
Mann, Robert E.
, Evelyn Vingilis, Douglas Gavin, Edward Adlaf, and Lise Anglin. 1991. “Sentence Severity and the Drinking Driver: Relationships with Traffic Safety Outcome.”Accident Analysis and Prevention23:483-491.
17.
McKnight, John
and Robert Voas. 1991. “The Effect of License Suspension upon DWI Recidivism.”Alcohol, Drugs and Driving7:43-54.
18.
Miller, T.
and L. Blincoe. 1994. “Incidence and Cost of Alcohol-Involved Crashes in the United States.”Accident Analysis and Prevention26:503-591.
19.
Morse, Barbara
and Delbert S. Elliott. 1992. “Effects of Ignition Interlock Devices on DUI Recidivism.”Crime and Delinquency38:131-157.
20.
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)
1995. Partners in Progress: Impaired Driving Goals and Strategies for 2005. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation.
21.
Nichols, James
and H. Laurence Ross. 1990. “The Effectiveness of Legal Sanctions in Dealing with Drunk Drivers.”Alcohol, Drugs and Driving6:33-60.
22.
Peck, Raymond C.1991. “Deterrent Effects of DUI Sanctions.”Alcohol, Drugs and Driving7:13-41.
23.
Peck, Raymond C.1993. “The Identification of Multiple Accident Correlates in High Risk Drivers with Specific Emphasis on the Role of Age, Experience and Prior Traffic Violation Frequency.”Alcohol, Drugs and Driving9:145-166.
24.
Peck, Raymond C.1994. “Evaluating DUI Program Impact in Quasi Experiments.”Alcohol, Drugs and Driving10:207-215.
25.
Peck, Raymond, C.
, Gary W. Arstein-Kerslake, and Clifford J. Helander. 1994. “Psycho-Social Correlates of Drunk Driving Recidivism.”Journal of Studies on Alcohol55:667-678.
26.
Ross, H. Laurence
. 1992. “Are DWI Sanctions Effective?”Alcohol, Drugs and Driving8:61-69.
27.
Ross, H. Laurence
, Kathryn Stewart, and Anthony Stein. 1995. “Vehicle-Based Sanctions: An Overview.” National Council of Research, Traffic Research Board. Circular437:50-52.
28.
Ross, H. Laurence
and Phillip Gonzales. 1988. “Effects of License Revocation on Drunk-Driving Offenders.”Accident Analysis and Prevention20:379-391.
29.
Ross, H. Laurence
and Robert Voas. 1989. The New Philadelphia Story: The Effects of Severe Penalties for Drunk Drivers. Washington, DC: AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety.
30.
Sadler, Daniel, M. W.Bud Perrine
, and Raymond C. Peck. 1991. “The Long-Term Traffic Safety Impact of a Pilot Alcohol Abuse Treatment as an Alternative to License Sanctions.”Accident Analysis and Prevention23:203-224.
31.
Simpson, Herbert
and Dan Mayhew. 1992. The Hard Core Drinking Driver. Ottawa: Traffic Injury Research Foundation of Canada.
Wells-Parker, Elisabeth
, Bradley J. Anderson, James. W. Landrum, and Robert W. Snow. 1988. “Long-Term Effectiveness of Probation, Short-Term Intervention and LAI Administration in Reducing DUI Recidivism.”British Journal of Addictions83:415-421.
34.
Wells-Parker, Elisabeth
, Robert Bangert-Drowns, RobertMcMillen, and Marsha Williams. 1995. “Final Results from a Meta-Analysis of Remedial Interventions with Drink/Drive Offenders.”Addiction90:907-926.
35.
Wilson, R. Jean
. 1991. “Subtypes of DWI's and High Risk Drivers: Implications for Differential Intervention.”Alcohol, Drugs and Driving7:1-12.
