The national movement for determinate sentencing, which began in the late 1960s, is rooted in two related principles: that the sentence imposed in court should bear a reasonable resemblance to the sentence served and that postconviction administrators should have little or no discretion over the duration of incarceration. This case study examines the forces that drove policymakers in Florida, where determinate sentencing was enacted in 1983, to violate both principles. In 1993, the state's determinate sentencing structure was revamped to rectify these fundamental deficiencies, but recent amendments suggest that the demise of administrative early release may be short-lived.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allen, Francis
. 1964. The Borderland of Criminal Justice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2.
Alschuler, Albert
. 1978. “Sentencing Reform and Prosecutorial Power.”University of Pennsylvania Law Review126:550-577.
3.
American Law Institute
. 1962. Official Draft of the Model Penal Code. Comments on Section 6.06. Philadelphia: American Law Institute.
4.
Association of Paroling Authorities, International. 1992. Untitled study.
5.
Austin, James
. 1993. Reforming Florida's Unjust, Costly and Ineffective Sentencing Laws. San Francisco: National Council on Crime and Delinquency.
6.
Bales, William
and Linda Dees. 1992. “Mandatory Minimum Sentencing in Florida: Past Trends and Future Implications.”Crime & Delinquency38:309-329.
7.
Blumstein, Alfred
, Jacqueline Cohen, and Michael Tonry, eds. 1983. Research on Sentencing: The Search for Reform, Vol. 1. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
8.
Bogan, Kathleen
. 1990. “Constructing Felony Sentencing Guidelines in an Already Crowded State: Oregon Breaks New Ground.”Crime & Delinquency36:467-487.
9.
Bottomley, Keith
. 1990. “Parole in Transition: A Comparative Study of Origins, Development, and Prospects for the 1990s.” Pp. 319-374 in Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, edited by M. Tonry and N. Morris. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.
Carrow, Deborah
, Judith Feins, Beverly Lee, and Lois Olinger. 1985. Guidelines Without Force: An Evaluation of the Multi-Jurisdictional Sentencing Guidelines Field Test. Cambridge, MA: ABT Associates.
11.
Casper, Jonathan
, David Brereton, and David Neal. 1982. The Implementation of the California Determinate Sentencing Law. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
12.
Clear, Todd
, John Hewitt, and Robert Regoli. 1978. “Discretion and the Determinate Sentence: Its Distribution, Control, and Effect on Time Served.”Crime & Delinquency24:428-445.
13.
Committee for the Study of Incarceration
. 1975. Doing Justice. New York: Hill & Wang.
14.
Costello v. Dugger, 353 F. Supp. 1324 (1972).
15.
Economic and Demographic Research Division Joint Legislative Management Committee
. 1992. An Empirical Examination of the Application of Florida's Habitual Offender Statute. Tallahassee, FL: Author.
16.
Feeley, Malcolm
. 1983. Court Reform on Trial. New York: Basic Books.
17.
Florida Criminal Justice Estimating Conference
. 1994. Final Report of the Criminal Justice Estimating Conference. Tallahassee: Author.
18.
Florida Department of Corrections
. 1992. Florida's Prison System: Capacity and Policy Crisis. Tallahassee: Author.
19.
Florida Department of Corrections
. 1993a. Corrections as a Business: Making Public Dollars Go Further. Tallahassee: Author.
20.
Florida Department of Corrections
. 1993b. Information Manual, September 1993. Tallahassee: Author.
21.
Florida Department of Corrections
. 1994. Telephone Information Service. Tallahassee: Author.
22.
Florida Parole and Probation Commission
. 1983. Florida Parole and Probation Commission Annual Report, 1982-83. Tallahassee: Author.
23.
Florida Parole and Probation Commission
. 1984. Florida Parole and Probation Commission Annual Report, 1983-1984. Tallahassee: Author.
24.
Florida Parole and Probation Commission
. 1989. Florida Parole and Probation Commission Annual Report, 1988-89. Tallahassee: Author.
25.
Florida Parole and Probation Commission
. Undated. Aggravating and Mitigating Factors. Tallahassee: Author.
26.
Fogel, David
. 1975. We Are the Living Proof—The Justice Model of Corrections. Cincinnati: Anderson.
27.
Frankel, Marvin
. 1972. Criminal Sentences: Law Without Order. New York: Hill & Wang.
28.
Frase, Richard
. 1994. “Sentencing Guidelines Alive and Well in U.S.”Overcrowded Times5:1-14.
29.
Frase, Richard
. 1995. “State Sentencing Guidelines: Still Going Strong.”Judicature78:173-180.
30.
Friedman, Lawrence
. 1993. Crime and Punishment in American History. New York: Basic Books.
31.
Griset, Pamala
. 1991. Determinate Sentencing: The Promise and the Reality of Retributive Justice. Albany: State University of New York Press.
32.
Griset, Pamala
. 1994. “Determinate Sentencing and the High Cost of Overblown Rhetoric: The New York Experience.”Crime & Delinquency40:532-549.
33.
Griswold, David
. 1985. “Florida's Sentencing Guidelines: Progression or Regression?”Federal Probation49:25-32.
34.
Griswold, David
. 1987. “Deviation From Sentencing Guidelines: The Issue of Unwarranted Disparity.”Journal of Criminal Justice15:317-329.
35.
Griswold, David
. 1989. “Florida's Sentencing Guidelines: Six Years Later.”Federal Probation53:46-50.
36.
Handberg, Roger
and N. Gary Holton. 1993. Reforming Florida's Sentencing Guidelines: Balancing Equity, Justice, and Public Safety. Dubuque, IA: Kendell-Hunt.
37.
Illinois Task Force on Crime and Corrections
. 1992. Interim Report. Chicago: Author.
38.
Irwin, John
and James Austin. 1994. It's About Time: America's Imprisonment Binge. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
39.
Laws of Florida. 1993. Senate Bill No. 26-B, Chapter 93-406.
40.
North Carolina Sentencing and Policy Advisory Commission
. 1993. Report to the 1993 Session of the General Assembly of North Carolina. Raleigh, NC: Author.
41.
Ohio Committee on Prison and Jail Crowding
. 1990. Final Report to the Governor. Columbus: Author.
42.
Plante, Kenneth
, Gordon Abernathy, William Salokar, and Richard Kern. 1981. “Judicial Sentencing—Help Is on the Way.”Florida Bar Journal55:536-540.
43.
Proband, Stan
. 1995. “Corrections Costs Lead State Budget Increases for 1995.”Overcrowded Times6:1-9.
44.
Reitz, Kevin
and Curtis Reitz. 1995. “Building a Sentencing Reform Agenda: The ABA's New Sentencing Standards.”Judicature78:189-196.
45.
Ritchie, Sarah
. 1992. “The Growing Problem of Corrections for American States.”State Fiscal Briefs. Albany, NY: Center for the Study of States, Rockefeller Institute for Government.
46.
Rothman, David
. 1980. Conscience and Convenience: The Asylum and Its Alternatives in Progressive America. Boston: Little, Brown.
47.
Rothman, David
. 1994. “The Crime of Punishment.”New York Review of Books17:34-38.
48.
Shane-DuBow, Sandra
, Alice Brown, and Erik Olsen. 1985. Sentencing Reform in the United States: History, Content, and Effect. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
49.
Sundberg, Alan
, Kenneth Plante, and Donna Brazier. 1983. “Florida's Initial Experience With Sentencing Guidelines.”Florida State University Law Review11:125-151.
50.
Tonry, Michael
. 1988. “Structuring Sentencing.” Pp. 267-337 in Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, edited by M. Tonry and N. Morris. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
51.
Tonry, Michael
. 1995. “Twenty Years of Sentencing Reform: Steps Forward, Steps Backward.”Judicature78:169-173.
52.
U.S. Department of Justice
, Bureau of Justice Statistics. 1992. Census of State and Federal Correctional Facilities 1990. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
53.
Von Hirsch, Andrew
. 1976. Doing Justice. New York: Hill & Wang.
54.
Wechsler, Herbert
. 1968. “Codification of Criminal Law in the United States: The Model Penal Code.”Columbia Law Review68:1425-1456.
55.
Wilson, James Q.
1975. Thinking About Crime. New York: Bantam.
