Responding to Domestic Violence Against Women

Barnett, Ola W. and Alyce D. LaViolette . 1993. It Could Happen to Anyone: Why Battered Women Stay. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Bell, Daniel J. and Susan L. Bell . 1991. “The Victim Offender Relationship as a Determinant in Police Dispositions of Family Violence Incidents: A Replication Study.” Policing and Society 1:225-234.

Brush, Lisa D. 1993. “Violent Acts and Injurious Outcomes in Married Couples: Methodological Issues in the National Survey of Families and Households.” Pp. 237-251 in Violence Against Women: The Bloody Footprints, edited by P. B. Bart and E. G. Moran . Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Buzawa, Eva S. and Carl G. Buzawa . 1990. Domestic Violence: The Criminal Justice Response. Newbury Park: Sage.

Cahn, Naomi R. and Lisa G. Lerman . 1991. “Prosecuting Woman Abuse.” Pp. 95-112 in Woman Battering: Policy Responses, edited by M. Steinman . Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.

Dobash, R. Emerson and Russell Dobash . 1979. Violence Against Wives. New York: Macmillan.

Dutton-Douglas , Mary Anne and Dorothy Dionne . 1991. “Counseling and Shelter Services for Battered Women.” Pp. 113-130 in Woman Battering: Policy Responses, edited by M. Steinman . Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.

Ferraro, Kathleen J. 1989. “The Legal Response to Woman Battering in the United States.” Pp. 155-184 in Women, Policing, and Male Violence, edited by J. Hanmer , J. Radford , and E. A. Stanko . New York: Routledge.

Ferraro, Kathleen J. 1993. “Cops, Courts, and Woman Battering.” Pp. 278-287 in Violence Against Women: The Bloody Footprints, edited by P. B. Bart and E. G. Moran . Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Fine, Michelle . 1993. “The Politics of Research and Activism: Violence Against Women.” Pp. 278-287 in Violence Against Women: The Bloody Footprints, edited by P. B. Bart and E. G. Moran . Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Ford, David A. and Mary Jean Regoli . 1993. “The Criminal Prosecution of Wife Assaults: Process, Problems, and Effects.” Pp. 163-218 in Legal Responses to Wife Assault: Current Trends and Evaluations, edited by N. Z. Hilton . Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Frieze, Irene Hanson and Angela Browne . 1989. “Violence in Marriage.” Pp. 163-218 in Family Violence, edited by L. Ohlin and M. Tonry . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Hamberger, L. Kevin and James E. Hastings . 1993. “Court-Mandated Treatment of Men Who Assault Their Partner.” Pp. 188-229 in Legal Responses to Wife Assault: Current Trends and Evaluations, edited by N. Z. Hilton . Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Hanmer, Jalna , Jill Radford , and Elizabeth A. Stanko . 1989. “Policing Men's Violence: An Introduction.” Pp. 1-12 in Women, Policing, and Male Violence, edited by J. Hanmer , J. Radford , and E. A. Stanko . New York: Routledge.

Hirschel, David J. and Ira Hutchison . 1991. “Police-Preferred Arrest Policies.” Pp. 49-72 in Woman Battering: Policy Responses, edited by M. Steinman . Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.

Kurz, Demie . 1993. “Social Science Perspectives on Wife Abuse: Current Debates and Future Directions.” Pp. 252-269 in Violence Against Women: The Bloody Footprints, edited by P. B. Bart and E. G. Moran . Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Saunders, Daniel G. 1993. “Husbands Who Assault Multiple Profiles Requiring Multiple Responses.” Pp. 9-34 in Legal Responses to Wife Assault: Current Trends and Evaluation, edited by N. Z. Hilton . Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Sherman, Lawrence W. and Richard A. Berk . 1994. “The Specific Deterrent Effects of Arrest for Domestic Assault.” American Sociological Review 49:261-272.

Stalans, Loretta J. and Mary A. Finn . 1995. “How Novice and Experienced Officers Interpret Wife Assaults: Normative and Efficiency Frames.” Law & Society Review 29:301-355.

Straus, Murray . 1991. “Conceptualization and Measurement of Battering: Implications for Public Policy.” Pp. 19-47 in Woman Battering: Policy Responses, edited by M. Steinman . Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.

Straus, Murray , Richard Gelles , and S. Steinmetz . 1980. Behind Closed Doors: Violence in the American Family. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

Zawitz, Marianne W. 1994. “Violence Between Intimates.” Bureau of Justice Statistics Selected Findings, NCJ-149259. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.