Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In 1991, the state of Iowa instituted a mandatory 2-day jail sentence and mandatory participation in a batterers' education program for conviction of misdemeanor domestic abuse assault. This article examines the impact of mandatory penalties on case processing, convictions, and sentences in one Iowa county. This examination shows that, although those convicted of domestic abuse assault did receive greater penalties, conviction rates declined considerably. Furthermore, cases became more complex and time-consuming. Mandatory penalties produced these results by reducing the percentage of defendants who pleaded guilty and increasing the importance of the cooperation of the victim for obtaining convictions.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Biemesderfer, Susan. C. 1992. “Begging Their Pardon.” State Legislatures 18:29-31.

Buzawa, Eve S. and Carl G. Buzawa . 1990. Domestic Violence: The Criminal Justice Response. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Cahn, Naomi R. 1992. “Innovative Approaches to the Prosecution of Domestic Violence Crimes: An Overview.” Pp. 161-180 in Domestic Violence: The Changing Criminal Justice Response, edited by E. Buzawa and C. Buzawa . Westport, CT: Auburn House.

Cannavale, Frank . 1976. Witness Cooperation. New York: Lexington Books.

Dobash, R. Emerson and Russell Dobash . 1979. Violence Against Wives. New York: Free Press.

Elliott, Delbert S. 1989. “Criminal Justice Procedures in Family Violence Crimes.” Pp. 427-480 in Crime and Justice: A Review of Research. Vol. 11: Family Violence, edited by L. Ohlin and M. Tonry . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Ferraro, Kathleen J. and Tascha Boychuk . 1992. “The Court's Response to Interpersonal Violence: A Comparison of Intimate and Nonintimate Assault.” Pp. 209-226 in Domestic Violence: The Changing Criminal Justice Response, edited by E. Buzawa and C. Buzawa . Westport, CT: Auburn House.

Ford, David A. 1991. “Prosecution as a Victim Power Resource: A Note on Empowering Women in Violent Conjugal Relationships.” Law and Society Review 25:313-314.

Hart, Barbara . 1993. “Battered Women and the Criminal Justice System.” American Behavioral Scientist 36:624-638.

10.

Kurz, Demie . 1992. “Battering and the Criminal Justice System: A Feminist View.” Pp. 21-38 in Domestic Violence: The Changing Criminal Justice Response, edited by E. Buzawa and C. Buzawa . Westport, CT: Auburn House.

11.

Lerman, Lisa . 1986. “Prosecution of Wife Beaters: Institutional Obstacles and Innovations.” Pp. 250-295 in Violence in the Home: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, edited M. Lystad . New York: Brunner/Mazel.

12.

Loseke, Donilenn R. and Spencer E. Cahill . 1984. “The Social Construction of Deviance: Experts on Battered Women.” Social Problems 31:296-310.

13.

Martin, Del . 1976. Battered Wives. San Francisco: Glide.

14.

Rauma, David . 1984. “Going for the Gold: Prosecutorial Decision Making in Cases of Wife Assault.” Social Science Research 13:321-351.

15.

Santiago, Frank . 1992. “Ruling on Abuse Sentences May Flood Jails.” Des Moines Register, December 29, p. 1.

16.

U.S. Bureau of the Census . 1993. Social and Economic Characteristics: Iowa. Document No. 1990 CP-2-17. Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Mandatory Penalties,Victim Cooperation,and the Judicial Processing of Domestic Abuse Assault Cases

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References