The juvenile court has been transformed from an informal, welfare agency into a scaled-down, second-class criminal court as a result of a series of reforms that divert status offenders, waive serious offenders to adult criminal courts, punish delinquent offenders, and provide more formal procedures. There are three plausible policy responses to juvenile courts that punish in the name of treatment and deny elementary procedural justice: (a) restructure juvenile courts to fit their original therapeutic purpose; (b) accept punishment as the purpose of delinquency proceedings, but coupled with criminal procedural safeguards; or (c) abolish juvenile courts and try young offenders in criminal courts with certain substantive and procedural modifications.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ainsworth, Janet
. 1991. “Re-imagining Childhood and Reconstructing the Legal Order: The Case for Abolishing the Juvenile Court.”North Carolina Law Review69:1083-1133.
2.
Allen, Francis A.
1981. The Decline of the Rehabilitative Ideal: Penal Policy and Social Purpose. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
3.
American Bar Association—Institute of Judicial Administration
. 1980a. Juvenile Justice Standards Relating to Counsel for Private Parties. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
4.
American Bar Association—Institute of Judicial Administration
. 1980b. Juvenile Justice Standards Relating to Dispositions. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
5.
American Bar Association—Institute of Judicial Administration
. 1980c. Juvenile Justice Standards Relating to Juvenile Delinquency and Sanctions. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
6.
American Bar Association—Institute of Judicial Administration
. 1982. Juvenile Justice Standards Relating to Noncriminal Misbehavior. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
7.
Andrews, R. Hale
and Andrew H. Cohn. 1974. “Ungovernability: The Unjustifiable Jurisdiction.”Yale Law Journal83:1383-1409.
8.
Dawson, Robert
. 1990. “The Future of Juvenile Justice: Is It Time to Abolish the System?”Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology81:136-155.
9.
Edwards, Leonard P.1992. “The Juvenile Court and the Role of the Juvenile Court Judge.”Juvenile and Family Court Journal43:1-45.
10.
Fagan, Jeffrey
, Martin Forst, and Scott Vivona. 1987. “Racial Determinants of the Judicial Transfer Decision: Prosecuting Violent Youth in Criminal Court.”Crime & Delinquency33:259-286.
11.
Fagan, Jeffrey
, Ellen Slaughter, and Eliot Hartstone. 1987. “Blind Justice? The Impact of Race on the Juvenile Justice Process.”Crime & Delinquency33: 224-258.
12.
Feld, Barry C.
1977. Neutralizing Inmate Violence: Juvenile Offenders in Institutions. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
13.
Feld, Barry C.1978. “Reference of Juvenile Offenders for Adult Prosecution: The Legislative Alternative to Asking Unanswerable Questions.”Minnesota Law Review62:515-618.
14.
Feld, Barry C.1981. “A Comparative Analysis of Organizational Structure and Inmate Subcultures in Institutions for Juvenile Offenders.”Crime & Delinquency27:336-363.
15.
Feld, Barry C.1984. “Criminalizing Juvenile Justice: Rules of Procedure for Juvenile Court.”Minnesota Law Review69:141-276.
16.
Feld, Barry C.1987. “Juvenile Court Meets the Principle of Offense: Legislative Changes in Juvenile Waiver Statutes.”Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology78:471-533.
17.
Feld, Barry C.1988a. “In re Gault Revisited: A Cross-State Comparison of the Right to Counsel in Juvenile Court.”Crime & Delinquency34:393-424.
18.
Feld, Barry C.1988b. “Juvenile Court Meets the Principle of Offense: Punishment, Treatment, and the Difference it Makes.”Boston University Law Review68:821-915.
19.
Feld, Barry C.1989. “The Right to Counsel in Juvenile Court: An Empirical Study of When Lawyers Appear and the Difference They Make.”Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology79:1185-1346.
20.
Feld, Barry C.1990a. “Bad Law Makes Hard Cases: Reflections on Teen-Aged Axe-Murderers, Judicial Activism, and Legislative Default.”Journal of Law and Inequality8:1-101.
21.
Feld, Barry C.1990b. “The Punitive Juvenile Court and the Quality of Procedural Justice: Disjunctions Between Rhetoric and Reality.”Crime & Delinquency36:443-466.
22.
Feld, Barry C.1991a. “Justice by Geography: Urban, Suburban, and Rural Variations in Juvenile Justice Administration.”Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology82:156-210.
23.
Feld, Barry C.1991b. “The Transformation of the Juvenile Court.”Minnesota Law Review75:691-725.
24.
Ferdinand, Theodore N.1989. “Juvenile Delinquency or Juvenile Justice: Which Came First?”Criminology27:79-106.
Flicker, Barbara
. 1983. Standards for Juvenile Justice: A Summary and Analysis. 2nd ed.Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
27.
Fox, Sanford J.1970a. “Juvenile Justice Reform: An Historical Perspective.”Stanford Law Review22:1187-1239.
28.
Fox, Sanford J.1970b. “Responsibility in the Juvenile Court.”William & Mary Law Review11:659-684.
29.
Gardner, Martin
. 1989. “The Right of Juvenile Offenders to be Punished: Some Implications of Treating Kids as Persons.”Nebraska Law Review68:182-215.
30.
Grisso, Thomas
. 1980. “Juveniles' Capacities to Waive Miranda Rights: An Empirical Analysis.”California Law Review68:1134-1166.
31.
Grisso, Thomas
. 1981. Juveniles' Waiver of Rights. New York: Plenum.
32.
Hamparian, Donna
, Linda Estep, Susan Muntean, Ramon Priestino, Robert Swisher, Paul Wallace, and Joseph White. 1982. Youth in Adult Courts: Between Two Worlds. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
33.
Handler, Joel F.
and Julie Zatz, eds. 1982. Neither Angels Nor Thieves: Studies in Deinstitutionalization of Status Offenders. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
34.
Klein, Malcolm W.
1979. “Deinstitutionalization and Diversion of Juvenile Offenders: A Litany of Impediments.” Pp. 145-201 in Crime and Justice: An Annual Review, edited by M. Tonry and N. Morris. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35.
Krisberg, Barry
, Ira Schwartz, Gideon Fishman, Zvi Eisikovits, Edna Guttman, and Karen Joe. 1987. “The Incarceration of Minority Youth.”Crime & Delinquency33:173-205.
36.
Lab, Steven P.
and John T. Whitehead. 1988. “An Analysis of Juvenile Correctional Treatment.”Crime & Delinquency34:60-83.
37.
Matza, David
. 1964. Delinquency and Drift. New York: Wiley.
38.
McCarthy, Belinda
and Brent L. Smith. 1986. “The Conceptualization of Discrimination in the Juvenile Justice Process: The Impact of Administrative Factors and Screening Decisions on Juvenile Court Dispositions.”Criminology24:41-64.
39.
Melton, Gary B.1989. “Taking Gault Seriously: Toward a New Juvenile Court.”Nebraska Law Review68:146-181.
40.
National Commission on Children
. 1991. Beyond Rhetoric: A New American Agenda for Children and Families. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
41.
Palmer, Ted
. 1991. “The Effectiveness of Intervention: Recent Trends and Current Issues.”Crime & Delinquency37:330-346.
42.
Platt, Anthony
. 1977. The Child Savers. 2nd ed.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
43.
Pope, Carl E.
and William H. Feyerherm. 1990a. “Minority Status and Juvenile Justice Processing: An Assessment of the Research Literature (Part I).”Criminal Justice Abstracts22:327-335.
44.
Pope, Carl E.
and William H. Feyerherm. 1990b. “Minority Status and Juvenile Justice Processing: An Assessment of the Research Literature (Part II).”Criminal Justice Abstracts22:527-542.
45.
President's Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice
. 1967. The Challenge of Crime in a Free Society. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
46.
Rosenberg, Irene M.1980. “The Constitutional Rights of Children Charged with Crime: Proposal for a Return to the Not So Distant Past.”University of California Los Angeles Law Review27:656-721.
47.
Rosenberg, Irene M.1993. “Leaving Bad Enough Alone: A Response to the Juvenile Court Abolitionists.”Wisconsin Law Review 1993:163-185.
48.
Rothman, David J.
1980. Conscience and Convenience: The Asylum and Its Alternative in Progressive America. Boston: Little, Brown.
49.
Rubin, H. Ted
. 1979. “Retain the Juvenile Court? Legislative Developments, Reform Directions and the Call for Abolition.”Crime & Delinquency25:281-298.
50.
Rubin, H. Ted
. 1985. Juvenile Justice: Policy, Practice, and Law. 2nd ed.New York: Random House.
51.
Schwartz, Ira M.
1989. (In)Justice for Juveniles: Rethinking the Best Interests of the Child. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
52.
Smith, Erin
. 1992. “In a Child's Best Interest: Juvenile Status Offenders Deserve Procedural Due Process.”Journal of Law & Inequality10:253-303.
53.
Sutton, John R.
1988. Stubborn Children: Controlling Deliquency in the United States. Berkeley: University of California Press.
54.
Twentieth Century Fund Task Force on Sentencing Policy Toward Young Offenders. 1978. Confronting Youth Crime. New York: Holmes & Meier.
55.
Von Hirsch, Andrew
. 1976. Doing Justice. New York: Hill and Wang.
56.
Walkover, Andrew
. 1984. “The Infancy Defense in the New Juvenile Court.”University of California Los Angeles Law Review31:503-562.
57.
Weithorn, Lois A.1988. “Mental Hospitalization of Troublesome Youth: An Analysis of Skyrocketing Admission Rates.”Stanford Law Review40:773-838.
58.
Whitehead, John T.
and Steven P. Lab. 1989. “A Meta-Analysis of Juvenile Correctional Treatment.”Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency26:267-295.
59.
Wizner, Steven
and Mary F. Keller. 1977. “The Penal Model of Juvenile Justice: Is Juvenile Court Delinquency Jurisdiction Obsolete?”New York University Law Review52:1120-1135.
60.
Zimring, Franklin
. 1982. The Changing Legal World of Adolescence. New York: Free Press.
61.
Zimring, Franklin
. 1991. “The Treatment of Hard Cases in American Juvenile Justice: In Defense of Discretionary Waiver.”Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics and Public Policy5:267-280.
