Crime is the product of the confluence of individuals low on self-control and appropriate opportunities. The likelihood of crime varies continuously with age, but the meaning of criminal acts does not depend on the age of the offender. Distinctions based on age are thus arbitrary, and probably cause more trouble than they are worth. Special treatment of juveniles is based on an erroneous image of developmental sequences, and misrepresents differences between juvenile and adult crime. We argue that one justice system would be better than two, and that of the models currently available, the juvenile system seems preferable to the adult.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Empey, LaMar
and Maynard Erickson. 1972. The Provo Experiment. Lexington, MA: D. C. Health.
2.
Glaser, Daniel
. 1972. Adult Crime and Social Policy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
3.
Glueck, Sheldon
and Eleanor Glueck. 1950. Unraveling Juvenile Delinquency. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4.
Gottfredson, Michael
and Travis Hirschi. 1990. A General Theory of Crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
5.
Haapanen, Rudy
. 1990. Selective Incapacitation and the Serious Offender. New York: Springer Verlag.
6.
Hirschi, Travis
and Michael Gottfredson. 1983. “Age and the Explanation of Crime.”American Journal of Sociology89:552-584.
7.
Murray, Charles
and Louis Cox. 1979. Beyond Probation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
8.
Sellin, Thorsten
and Marvin Wolfgang. 1964. Measurement of Delinquency. New York: Wiley.
9.
West, Donald
and David Farrington. 1973. Who Becomes Delinquent?London: Heinemann.
10.
Wolfgang, Marvin
, Robert Figlio, and Thorsten Sellin. 1972. Delinquency in a Birth Cohort. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
