In 1982, California passed into law severe sanctions for driving while intoxicated. The effects of these law changes on policing were investigated. Using limited time series and elite interview methodologies, it was found that the law's passage was related to reduced arrest rates for several misdemeanors, including driving under the influence.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aaronson, David, C.Thomas Dienes
, and Michael C. Musheno. 1978. “Changing the Public Drunkenness Laws: The Impact of Decriminalization.”Law and Society Review12:405-436.
2.
Box, George E. P.
and George C. Tiao. 1975. “Intervention Analysis with Application to Economic and Environmental Problems.”Journal of the American Statistical Association70:70-79.
3.
Board of Corrections
. 1986. Impact of Convicted Drunk Drivers on Local Detention Systems. Sacramento, CA: Board of Corrections.
4.
Bottoms, A. E.1981. “The Suspended Sentence in England.”British Journal of Criminology1:1-26.
5.
Bureau of Criminal Statistics
. 1987. Crime and Delinquency in California, 1986. Sacramento: State of California Department of Justice, Division of Law Enforcement, Criminal Identification and Information Branch.
6.
Campbell, Donald T.1971. “Legal Reforms as Experiments.”Journal of Legal Education23:217-239.
7.
Campbell, Donald T.
and H. Laurence. Ross. 1968. “The Connecticut Crackdown on Speeding: Time Series Data in Quasi-experimental Analysis.”Law and Society Review3:33-53.
8.
Campbell, Donald T.
, H. Laurence Ross and G. V. Glass. 1970. “Determining the Effects of a Legal Reform.”American Behavioral Scientist13:493.
9.
Casper, Jonathan D.
and David Bereton. 1984. “Evaluating Criminal Justice Reforms.”Law and Society Review18:121-144.
10.
Churchman, C. W.
1979. The Systems Approach and Its Enemies. New York: Basic Books.
11.
Cole, G. F.
1976. Criminal Justice: Law and Politics. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
12.
Cook, Thomas D.
and Donald T. Campbell. 1979. Quasi-experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Studies. Chicago: Rand-McNally.
13.
Davis, K. C.
1971. Discretionary Justice: A Preliminary Study. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
14.
Davis, F. James
and Barbara Sherman Heyl. 1983. “Implementing Public Law 94-142, The Education for All Handicapped Children Act, in an Illinois School District.”Research in Law, Deviance and Social Control5:99-139.
15.
Dooley, David
. 1984. Social Research Methods. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
16.
Goldstein, J.1960. “Police Discretion Not to Invoke the Criminal Process: Low-Visibility Decisions in the Administration of Justice.”The Yale Law Journal69:543-594.
17.
Jacob, H.
1972. Justice in America: Courts, Lawyers, and the Judicial Process. Boston: Little-Brown.
18.
Kizziah, Carol
. 1984. Overcrowding in the Jails. Sacramento, CA: Board of Corrections.
19.
Kleck, Gary
. 1986. “Policy Lessons from Recent Gun Control Research.”Law and Contemporary Problems49:5-62.
20.
Klein, Dorie
. 1985. The Impact and Consequences of the 1982 Law on Drunk Driving Adjudication: Final Report. Oakland, CA: Office of Court Services, Alameda County.
21.
Little, Joseph. W.1972. “A Theory and Empirical Study of What Deters Drinking Drivers, If, When, and Why! Part II.”, Administrative Law Review23:170-193.
22.
Lofland, J.
1971. Analyzing Social Settings. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
23.
MADD
. 1985. A Summary of Statistics Related to the National Drunk Driving Problem. Hurst, TX: National Headquarter's MADD Press.
McCleary, Richard
and Michael C. Musheno. 1981. “Floor Effects in the Time Series Quasi-Experiment.”Political Methodology7:181-204.
26.
Nagin, Daniel
. 1979. “The Impact of Determinate Sentencing Legislation on Prison Population and Sentence Length: A California Case Study.”Public Policy27:69-98.
27.
National Institute of Justice
. 1985. Jailing Drunk Drivers: Impact on the Criminal Justice System. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
28.
Newman, G.
1979. Understanding Violence. New York: Lippincott.
29.
Ross, H. Laurence
. 1975. “The Scandinavian Myth: The Effectiveness of Drinking and Driving Legislation in Sweden and Norway.”Journal of Legal Studies2:285-310.
30.
Rubenstein, Micheal L.
and Teresa J. White. 1979. “Alaska's Ban on Plea Bargaining.”Law and Society Review13:367-383.
31.
Shover, Neal
, William Bankston, and J. William Gurley. 1977. “Response of the Criminal Justice System to Legislation Providing More Severe Threatened Sanctions.”Criminology14:483-515.
32.
Stewart, Kathryn
, Leonard Epstein, Paul Gruenewald, Susan Laurence, and Theresa Roth. 1987. The California First DUI Offender Evaluation Project: Final Report. Walnut Creek, CA: Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation.
33.
Weed, Frank J.1982. “Grass Roots Activism and the Drunk Driving Issue.”Law and Policy9:259-278.
34.
Wiegand, Steve
. 1981. “Brown Signs Tough Bills on Drunk Driving Issue.”San Francisco ChronicleSeptember 3, sec. 1, pp. 1-6.
35.
Zimring, Franklin
. 1975. “Firearms and Federal Law: The Gun Control Act of 1968.”Journal of Legal Studies4:133-198.
