Prison populations are increasing and prison construction is struggling to catch up. The goals of new prison siting are discussed within the contexts of public safety and economic concerns. There is no evidence that correctional facilities decrease public safety, negatively affect land values, or harm the local economy; available evidence is to the contrary. Methods for improving prison siting are provided. More study is suggested in order to determine which communities can best absorb correctional facilities and other types of potentially undesirable land uses.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abrams, Kathleen S.1988. “Prisons as LULUs: A Sequel, Part 3.”Environmental and Urban Issues15:12-14.
2.
Abrams, Kathleen S.
and William Lyons. 1987. Impact of Correctional Facilities on Land Values and Public Safety. North Miami: FAU-FIU Joint Center for Environmental and Urban Problems, Florida International University.
3.
Abrams, Kathleen S.
and Annick T. Martin. 1987. “Prisons as LULUs: A Sequel.”Environmental and Urban Issues14:18-21.
4.
American Correctional Association
. 1987. 1987 Directory of Juvenile and Adult Correctional Departments, Institutions, Agencies, and Paroling Authorities. College Park, MD: American Correctional Association.
5.
California Department of Corrections (CDC)
. 1985. Procedures for Public Involvement in Selecting Prison Sites. Sacramento: California Department of Corrections.
6.
California Department of Corrections (CDC)
. 1987, September. “Building New Prisons, Questions and Answers.”Sacramento: California Department of Corrections. (brochure)
7.
Carlson, Katherine A.1988. “Understanding Community Opposition to Prison Siting, More Than Fear and Finances.”Corrections Today50:84.
8.
Chambers, Marian
. 1989. “Learning to Live with LULUs.”Environmental and Urban Issues16:17-22.
9.
Corrections Compendium. 1989, September/October. “Prison Construction Booms in U.S. - Up 73 Percent.”Lincoln, NE: Contact Center, Inc.
10.
Glascock, Cynthia
. 1985. “My Backyard Is a Prison Farm.”Detroit Free Press, November 12, p. 9.
11.
Goldfarb, Carl
. 1990a “U.S. Studies Alternates to Site Near Art School for Downtown Prison.”Miami Herald, February 23, p. 2B. Reprinted with permission of The Miami Herald.
12.
Goldfarb, Carl
. 1990b. “Opposition Shifts as Jail Site Moves.”Miami Herald, September 13, p. 1B. Reprinted with permission of The Miami Herald.
13.
Grieco, A. L.1978. “New Prisons-Characteristics and Community Reception.”Quarterly Journal of Corrections2:55-56.
14.
Hawes, Jerry A.
1985. Cities With Prisons: Do They Have Higher or Lower Crime Rates? A Special Report to Senator Robert Presley, Chair, Joint Committee on Prison Construction and Operations. Sacramento: California Senate Office of Research.
15.
Jacobs, James
. 1976. “The Politics of Corrections: Town/Prison Relations as a Determinant of Reform.”Social Service Review50:623-631.
16.
Lawscope
. 1984. “Not in My Neighborhood.”American Bar Association Journal70:27-29.
17.
Lazo, Rodrigo
. 1989. “MDCC Mobilizes to Fight Prison Site.”Miami Herald, October 6, p. 1B. Reprinted with permission of The Miami Herald.
18.
Mason, Todd
. 1991. “Many For-Profit Jails Hold No Profits - Nor Even Any Inmates.”Wall Street Journal, June 18, p. A1.
19.
McGee, Richard A.
1981. Prisons and Politics. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.
20.
Parks, Loren L.
, Everard M. Lofting, and Cynthia E. Davis. 1988. “The Economic and Fiscal Impacts of a State Prison Near Wasco, Kern County.” Prepared for the California Department of Corrections Planning and Construction Division, Sacramento, May 16.
21.
Popper, Frank J.1981. “Siting LULUs.”Planning47:12.
22.
Rogers, George O.
and Marshall Haimes. 1987. “Local Impact of a Low-Security Federal Correctional Institution.”Federal Probation51:28-34.
23.
Smykla, John O.
, Carl E. Ferguson, Jr., David C. Cheng, Carolyn Trent, Barbara French, and Annette Waters. 1984. “Effects of a Prison Facility on the Regional Economy.”Journal of Criminal Justice12:521-539.
24.
Snohomish County v. State 648 P.2d 430 (Wash. 1982).
25.
Taylor-Weeks, G.1985. “FBOP & INS: A Joint Nightmare in Louisiana.”Jericho39:4.
26.
Travis, Kevin M.
and Francis J. Sheridan. 1983. “Community Involvement in Prison Siting.”Corrections Today45:14.
27.
Travis, Kevin M.
and Francis J. Sheridan. 1986. “New York State Site Problems? Not Here!”Corrections Today48:12.
28.
U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics
. 1988a. BJS Data Report, 1987. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
29.
U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics
. 1988b. Profile of State Prison Inmates, 1986. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
30.
U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics
. 1989a. Prisoners in 1988. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
31.
U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics
. 1989b. “Advance - Prison Population Jumps 7.3 Percent in Six Months.”Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
32.
U.S. Federal Bureau of Prisons
. 1988. A Report to the Attorney General on the Disturbances at the Federal Detention Center, Oakdale, Louisiana, U.S. Penitentiary, Atlanta, Georgia. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
33.
Viglucci, Andres
. 1989. “Feds' Plan: Put 1,000-Bed Prison Downtown.”Miami Herald, September 27, p. 1D. Reprinted with permission of The Miami Herald.
34.
Watt, Peter K.
1988. Policy Options for Siting Oregon Correctional Facilities. Prepared for Governor's Task Force on Corrections Planning. Eugene, OR: Bureau of Government Research and Service.
