Building on an earlier work (Farrington 1990) that argued that the modern American correctional facility should be viewed as a “somewhat-less-than-total,” as opposed to a truly “total,” institution (Goffman 1961), this article discusses the specific reasons why the contemporary prison is not more fully, more totally, and more effectively separated from the larger social world(s) in which it is situated. It then examines the extent to which the image of the prison as a total institution remains a predominant part of American thinking about prisons and their functions. Finally, it considers the possible ramifications of this apparent disjuncture between objective prison reality and “the myth of the prison as a total institution.”
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abrams, Kathleen Shea
. 1988. “Prisons as LULUs: A Sequel, Part 3.”Environmental and Urban Issues15:12-14.
2.
Blayney, Marianne H.
1991. “Rehabilitation in the Prison: An Organizational Goal? A Study of Staff Attitudes.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, San Francisco, CA, November.
3.
Bowker, Lee. H.1980. “Exile, Banishment and Transportation: A History and a Proposal for Penal Reform.”International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology24:67-80.
4.
Bowker, Lee. H.
1982. Corrections: The Science and the Art. New York: Macmillan.
5.
Carlson, Katherine A.
1990. The Impacts of a New Prison on a Small Town: Twice Blessed or Double Whammy?, the final report of the Clallam Bay Project (#85-IJ-CX-0022), prepared for the National Institute of Justice. Port Angeles, WA: Clallam County Sheriff's Department.
6.
Champion, Dean J.
1990. Criminal Justice in the United States. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
7.
Cohn, Alvin W.1973. “The Failure of Correctional Management.”Crime & Delinquency19:323-331.
8.
Cole, George F.
1989. The American System of Criminal Justice, 5th ed.Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Davis, Su Perk
. 1989. “Prison Construction Booms in U.S.—Up 73 Percent.”Corrections Compendium14:10.
11.
Durkheim, Emile
. 1933. The Division of Labor in Society. Translated by George Simpson. New York: Macmillan.
12.
Farrington, Keith
. 1990. “The Modern Prison as a `Not-so-Total Institution': Impacts Upon, Transactions With, and Penetrations Into the Larger Community.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Baltimore, MD, November.
13.
Farrington, Keith
and Charles E. Cleveland. 1991. “Toward the Development of a Sociological Model of the Prison Siting Process.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Western Social Science Association, Reno, NV, April.
14.
Farrington, Keith
, Terry Edvalson, John R. Millay, and Patricia K. Middelburg. 1991. “Community Attitudes Towards a Prison-Under-Construction: The Case of Ontario, Oregon.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences, Nashville, TN, March.
15.
Foucault, Michel
. 1979. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage.
16.
Gibbons, Don C.1963. “Who Knows What about Correction?”Crime & Delinquency9:137-144.
17.
Gibbons, Don C.
1987. Society, Crime, and Criminal Behavior, 5th ed.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
18.
Goffman, Erving
. 1961. Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
19.
Grieco, Alan L.1978. “New Prisons: Characteristics and Community Reception.”Quarterly Journal of Corrections2:55-60.
20.
Inciardi, James A.
1990. Criminal Justice, 3rd. ed.San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
21.
Jacobs, James B.1976. “The Politics of Corrections: Town/Prison Relations as a Determinant of Reform.”Social Service Review50:623-631.
22.
Jacobs, James B.
1977. Stateville: The Penitentiary in Mass Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23.
Jacobs, James B.
and Helen A. Brooks. 1983. “The Mass Media and Prison News.” Pp. 106-114 in New Perspectives on Prisons and Imprisonment, edited by J. B. Jacobs. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
24.
Krajick, Kevin
. 1980. “ `Not on My Block': Local Opposition Impedes the Search for Alternatives.”Corrections Magazine6:15-29.
25.
LeClair, Daniel P.
and Susan Guarino-Ghezzi. 1991. “Does Incapacitation Guarantee Public Safety? Lessons from the Massachusetts Furlough and Prerelease Programs.”Justice Quarterly8:9-36.
26.
Martin, Steve J.
and Sheldon Ekland-Olson. 1987. Texas Prisons: The Walls Came Tumbling Down. Austin: Texas Monthly Press.
27.
Mauer, Marc
. 1991. Americans Behind Bars: A Comparison of International Rates of Incarceration. Washington, DC: The Sentencing Project.
28.
McGee, Richard A.
1981. Prisons and Politics. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
29.
McShane, Marilyn D.
and Frank P. Williams III. 1989. “Running on Empty: Creativity and the Correctional Agenda.”Crime & Delinquency35:562-576.
30.
Millay, John R.
, Laura Wickman, Keith Farrington, and Angela McGlynn. 1991. “Community Leadership Anticipates the Opening of a Prison.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, San Francisco, CA, November.
31.
Newman, Donald J.
1986. Introduction to Criminal Justice, 3rd. ed.New York: Random House.
32.
Pagel, Al.1988. “Prejudices Set Aside... Communities Woo Prisons.”Corrections Compendium12:1,6-8.
33.
Institutions on Communities, edited by R. M. Lidman, M. E. Poole, and P. A. Roper. Olympia: Washington State Institution for Public Policy.
34.
President's Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice
. 1967. The Challenge of Crime in a Free Society. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
35.
Reid, Sue Titus
. 1990. Criminal Justice, 2nd. ed.New York: Macmillan.
36.
Rothman, David J.
1971. The Discovery of the Asylum: Social Order and Disorder in the New Republic. Boston: Little, Brown.
37.
Sechrest, Dale K.1991. “Understanding the Corrections and Community Response to Prison Siting.”The Humboldt Journal of Social Relations17: 1-16.
38.
Sechrest, Dale K.
, Nick Pappas, and Shelley J. Price. 1987. “Building Prisons: Pre-manufactured, Prefabricated, and Prototype.”Federal Probation51:35-41.
39.
Seidel, Karen M.
, Kevin S. Knudtson, and Kenneth D. Viegas. 1987. Salem Area Community Corrections: State Clients, Local Services, and Policy Choices. Eugene: Bureau of Government Research and Service, University of Oregon.
40.
Senna, Joseph J.
and Larry J. Siegel. 1990. Introduction to Criminal Justice, 5th ed.St. Paul, MN: West.
41.
Silas, Faye A.1984. “ `Not in My Neighborhood': People Want Prisons — But Most Want Them Someplace Else.”American Bar Association Journal70:27-29.
42.
Smith, Michael. 1983. Behavioral Patterns of Involved Versus Non-Involved Inmates in the Extended-Family Visiting Program. Unpublished B.A. thesis, Whitman College.
43.
Stojkovic, Stan
. 1990. “Book Review Essay: Prison Reform and Prison Management.”Justice Quarterly7:757-766.
44.
Sutherland, Edwin H.
and Donald R. Cressey. 1978. Criminology, 10th ed.Philadelphia: Lippincott.
45.
Sykes, Gresham M.
1958. The Society of Captives: A Study of a Maximum Security Prison. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
46.
Travis, Kevin M.
and Francis J. Sheridan. 1983. “Community Involvement in Prison Siting.”Corrections Today45:14-15.
47.
Travis, Kevin M.
and Francis J. Sheridan. 1986. “New York State Site Problems? Not Here!”Corrections Today48:12-16.
48.
Watt, Peter K.
1988. Policy Options for Siting Oregon Correctional Facilities. Eugene: Bureau of Governmental Research and Service, University of Oregon.
49.
Weber, Max
. 1949. On the Methodology of the Social Sciences. Translated by Edward A. Shils and Henry A. Finch. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
50.
Wilson, James Q.
and Richard J. Herrnstein. 1985. Crime & Human Nature. New York: Simon & Schuster.
