Abstract
Using South Australia as a case study, this article examines the role and the impact of the lawyer in the children's court. It suggests that the failure of English and American researchers to find a consistently significant role for the children's lawyer may be a function of the narrowness of their focus: on the formal court process rather than on the informal processes of justice that precede the court hearing. It concludes that in South Australia, lawyers are most influential when bargaining a plea on behalf of their clients. It is in this area of discretionary justice that the young defendant may experience both the best and the worst effects of legal representation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
