This study investigates a notification procedure to increase the payment of victim restitution. A sample of 223 adult probationers owing restitution in Cook County, Illinois, was randomly assigned to treatment and control groups. Offenders in the treatment group received a notification letter; offenders in the control group did not. The letter reminded defaulters of the amount owed, told them how to make payment, and threatened serious sanctions if they did not comply. Offenders receiving a notification letter were significantly more likely to pay restitution. The procedure was more effective with offenders who were employed and who had fewer prior arrests and prior probations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abadinsky, Howard
. 1985. Probation and Parole: Theory and Practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
2.
Byrne, James M.
and Linda Kelly. 1989. Restructuring Probation as an Intermediate Sanction: An Evaluation of the Massachusetts Intensive Probation Supervision Program. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
3.
Chesney, Steven L.
1978. “The Assessment of Restitution in the Minnesota Probation Services.” Pp. 146-186 in Restitution in Criminal Justice, edited by J. Hudson. Minneapolis: Minnesota Department of Corrections.
4.
Clear, Todd R.
and Patricia L. Hardyman. 1990. “The New Intensive Supervision Movement.”Crime and Delinquency36:42-61.
5.
Cohen, Jacob
and Patricia Cohen. 1983. Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd. ed.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6.
Cole, George
. 1989. Innovations in Collecting and Enforcing Fines. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
7.
Edelhertz, Herbert
. 1977. “Legal and Operational Issues in the Implementation of Restitution Within the Criminal Justice System.” Pp. 63-77 in Restitution in Criminal Justice, edited by J. Hudson and B. Galaway. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
8.
Fry, Margery
. 1951. Arms of the law. London: Victor Gollancz.
9.
Galaway, Burt
. 1977. “Toward the Rational Development of Restitution Programming.” Pp. 77-91 in Restitution in Criminal Justice, edited by J. Hudson and B. Galaway. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
10.
Galaway, Burt
. 1988. “Restitution as Innovation or Unfulfilled Promise?”Federal Probation52:3-14.
11.
Galaway, Burt
and Joseph Hudson. 1978. “Introduction.” Pp. 1-13 in Offender Restitution in Theory and Action, edited by B. Galaway and J. Hudson. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
12.
Guynes, Randall
. 1988. Nation's Jail Managers Assess Their Problems. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
13.
Hall, Andy
. 1985. Alleviating Jail Overcrowding: A Systems Perspective. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
14.
Harland, Alan T.1983. “One Hundred Years of Restitution: An International Review.”Victimology8:190-203.
15.
Harland, Alan T.
1981. Restitution to Victims of Personal and Household Crimes. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
16.
Hillenbrand, Susan W.
1990. “Restitution and Victims' Rights in the 1980s.” In Victims of Crime: Problems, Policies, and Programs, edited by A. J. Lurigio, W. G. Skogan and R. C. Davis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
17.
Hillenbrand, Susan W.
and Barbara E. Smith. 1989. Victims Rights Legislation: An Assessment of its Impact on Criminal Justice Practitioners and Victims. Chicago: American Bar Association.
18.
Hillsman, Sally T.
and Judith A. Greene. 1988. “European `Day Fines' as a Method for Improving the Administration of Monetary Penalties in American Criminal Courts.”Perspectives12:35-38.
19.
Hillsman, Sally T.
, Joyce L. Sichel, and Barry Mahoney. 1984. Fines in Sentencing: A Study of the Use of the Fine as a Criminal Sanction. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
20.
Hudson, Joseph
and Burt Galaway. 1977. “Introduction.” Pp. 1-19 in Restitution in Criminal Justice, edited by J. Hudson and B. Galaway. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
21.
Jacobs, Bruce
. 1977. The Concept of Restitution: An Historical Overview. Pp. 45-62 in Restitution in Criminal Justice, edited by J. Hudson and B. Galaway. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
22.
Karmen, Andrew
. 1984. Crime Victims: An Introduction to Victimology. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
23.
Keve, Paul W.
1978. “Therapeutic Uses of Restitution.” Pp. 59-64 in Offender Restitution in Theory and Action, edited by B. Galaway and J. Hudson. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
24.
Leepson, Marc
. 1982. “Helping Victims of Crime.”Editorial Research Reports17:331-344.
25.
Lurigio, Arthur J.
1981. The Identification of Factors That Predict Risk Among Cook County Probationers. Case Classification Research Project: Report no. 2. Chicago: Cook County Adult Probation Department.
26.
Lurigio, Arthur J.
1984. The Relationship between Offender Characteristics and the Fulfillment of Financial Restitution. Chicago: Cook County Adult Probation Department.
27.
Lurigio, Arthur J.
1986. Describing and Predicting Recidivism among Felony Probationers: A Limited Replication of the Rand Study. Case Classification Research Project: Report no. 6. Chicago: Cook County Adult Probation Department.
28.
Lurigio, Arthur J.
1988. “An Evaluation of Intensive Probation Supervision as an Alternative Sanction.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Chicago, November.
29.
Martinson, Robert
. 1976. “What works? Questions and answers about prison reform.” Pp. 145-163 in Rehabilitation, Recidivism, and Research edited by R. Martinson, T. Palmer, and S. Adams. New Jersey: National Council on Crime and Delinquency.
30.
McAnany, Patrick D.
1978. “Restitution as Idea and Practice: The Restributive Prospect.” Pp. 15-33 in Offender Restitution in Theory and Action, edited by B. Galaway and J. Hudson. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
31.
McDonald, William F.
1977. “The Role of the Victim in America.” Pp. 295-307 in Assessing the Criminal: Restitution, Retribution, and the Legal Process, edited by R. Barnett and J. Hagel. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
32.
National Institute of Justice
. 1982. Statement of Recommended Judicial Practices. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
33.
Petersilia, Joan M.
and Susan Turner. 1990. “Comparing Intensive and Regular Supervision for High-Risk Probationers: Early Results from an Experiment in California.”Crime and Delinquency36:87-111.
34.
Petersilia, Joan M.
, Susan Turner, J. Kahan, and J. Peterson. 1985. Granting Felons Probation: Public Risks and Alternatives. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
35.
President's Task Force on the Victims of Crime
. 1982. Final Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
36.
People vs. Harder 59 Ill. 2d 557, 563-68 (1975).
37.
People vs. Yantis 125 Ill. 3d 767, 767-74 (1984).
38.
Reichardt, Charles S. 1979. The Design and Analysis of the Nonequivalent Group Quasi-Experiment. Ph. D. dissertation, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
39.
Rogosa, Daniel
. 1978. “Causal Models in Longtitudinal Research: Rationale, Formulation, and Interpretation.” Pp. 97-123 in Longtitudinal Research in Human Development: Design and Analysis, edited by J. R. Nesselroade and P. B. Baltes. New York: Academic Press.
40.
Schafer, Stephen
. 1977. Victimology: The Victim and His Criminal. Virginia: Reston.
41.
Skogan, Wesley G.
, Arthur J. Lurigio, and Robert C. Davis. 1990. “Criminal Victimization.” In Victims of Crime: Problems, Policies, and Programs, edited by A. J. Lurigio, W. G. Skogan, and R. C. Davis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
42.
Smith, Barbara E.
, Robert C. Davis, and Susan W. Hillenbrand. 1989. Improving Enforcement of Court-Ordered Restitution. Chicago: American Bar Association.
43.
Stookey, John A.
1977. “The Victim's Perspective on American Criminal Justice.” Pp. 19-27 in Restitution in Criminal Justice, edited by J. Hudson and B. Galaway. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
44.
Tittle, Charles R.
1978. “Restitution and Deterrence: An Evaluation of Compatibility.” Pp. 33-58 in Offender Restitution in Theory and Action, edited by B. Galaway and J. Hudson. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
45.
Wheeler, Gerald R.
, Amy S. Rudolph, and Rodney V. Hissong. 1989. “Do Probationers' Characteristics Affect Fee Assessment, Payment, and Outcome?”Perspectives13:12-17.
