Comparing Intensive and Regular Supervision for High-Risk Probationers: Early Results from an Experiment in California

Abstract

This article reports on the six-month outcomes of a randomized experiment testing the effects of Intensive Supervision Programs (ISPs) in three California Counties (Contra Costa, Ventura, and Los Angeles). The findings show that ISP officers were able to intensify the monitoring of ISP offenders but were less successful at increasing services (e.g., counseling, employment) provided to clients. The program outcomes in Los Angeles and Contra Costa show that offenders on ISP were significantly more likely than their counterparts on regular probation to incur technical violations but were not more likely to incur new arrests or incarcerations. In Ventura, in which the control program was a different type of ISP, no differences were evident in any outcome measure. The article discusses the implications of these findings for the future of Intensive Supervision programs.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Banks, J. A. , A. L. Porter , R. L. Rardin , R. R. Silver , and V. E. Unger . 1977. Evaluation of Intensive Special Probation Projects: Phase I Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

Carter, R. and L. T. Wilkins . 1984. “Caseloads: Some Conceptual Models.” In Probation, Parole and Community Corrections, edited by R. Carter and L. T. Wilkins . Second edition. New York: Wiley.

Erwin, B. S. and L. A. Bennett . January 1987. “New Dimensions in Probation: Georgia's Experience with Intensive Probation Supervision (ISP).” Research in Brief. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice.

National Center on Institutions and Alternatives . 1986. “The Technical Violators Project.” Unpublished memorandum. Alexandria, VA: Author.

Neithercutt, M. G. and D. M. Gottfredson . 1974. Caseload Size Variation and Differences in Probation/Parole Performance. Washington, DC: National Center for Juvenile Justice.

Petersilia, J. 1987a. Expanding Options for Criminal Sentencing. R-3544-EMC. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.

Petersilia, J. 1987b. “Georgia's Intensive Probation: Will the Model Work Elsewhere?” Pp. 15-30 in Intermediate Punishments, edited by Belinda McCarthy . Monsey, NY: Willow Tree Press.

Petersilia, J. and S. Turner . 1986. Prison Versus Probation in California: Implications for Crime and Offender Recidivism. R-3323-NIJ. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.

Petersilia, J. S. Turner . S. Turner , J. Kahan , and J. Peterson . 1985. Granting Felons Probation. R-3186-NIJ. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.