Albanese, Jay S.
, Bernadette A. Fiore, Jerie H. Powell, and Janet R. Storti. 1980. Is Probation Working?Washington, DC: University of America Press.
2.
Baird, Christopher
. 1988. Analysis of the Diversionary Impact of the Florida Community Control Program: Preliminary Report. Madison, WI: National Council on Crime and Delinquency.
3.
Banks, J.
, A. L. Porter, R. L. Rardin, T. R. Silver, and V. E. Unger. 1977. Summary Phase I Evaluation of Intensive Special Probation Project, Washington, DC: National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice.
4.
Bennett, Lawrence A.
1987a. “A Reassessment of Intensive Service Probation,” In Intermediate Punishments: Intensive Supervision, Home Confinement, and Electronic Surveillance, edited by B. McCarthy. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
5.
Bennett, Lawrence A.
1987b. Practice in Search of a Theory: The Case of Intensive Supervision—An Extension of an Old Practice or a New Approach?Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice.
6.
Binder, Arnold
and James M. Meeker. 1988. “Experiments as Reforms,”Journal of Criminal Justice16(4):347-358.
7.
Blumstein, Alfred
, Jacqueline Cohen, Jeffrey A. Roth, and Christy A. Visher, eds. 1986. Criminal Careers and “Career Criminals”. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
8.
Braswell, Michael C.1989. “Correctional Treatment and the Human Spirit: A Focus on Relationship.”Federal Probation53(2):49-60.
9.
Bureau of Justice Statistics
. 1985. Felony Sentencing in 18 Local Jurisdictions, Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
10.
Bureau of Justice Statistics
. 1988a. “Prisoners in 1987.”BJS Bulletin. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
11.
Bureau of Justice Statistics
. 1988b. “Probation and Parole 1987.”BJS Bulletin. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
12.
Bursik, Robert J., Jr.1988. “Social Disorganization and Theories of Crime and Delinquency: Problems and Prospects.”Criminology26(4):519-552.
13.
Byrne, James M.1986. “The Control Controversy: A Preliminary Examination of Intensive Probation Supervision Programs in the United States.”Federal Probation50:4-16.
14.
Byrne, James M.1989. “Reintegrating the Concept of Community Into Community-Based Corrections.”Crime and Delinquency35:471-499.
15.
Byrne, James M.
and Linda Kelly. 1989. Restructuring Probation as an Intermediate Sanction: An Evaluation of the Massachusetts Intensive Probation Supervision Program (Final Report to the National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice, Research Program on the Punishment and Control of Offenders). Washington, DC.
16.
Byrne, James M.Linda Kelly
. Linda Kelly, and Susan Guarino-Ghezzi. 1988. “Understanding the Limits of Technology: An Examination of the Use of Electronic Monitoring in the Criminal Justice System.”PerspectivesSpring:30-36.
17.
Byrne, James M.Linda Kelly
. Linda Kelly, Susan Guarino-Ghezzi. Arthur Lurigio, and Christopher Baird. 1989. “The Effectiveness of the `New' Intensive Supervision Programs.”Research in Corrections5:1-70.
18.
Champion, Dean J.1988. “Felony Plea Bargaining and Probation: A Growing Judicial and Prosecutorial Dilemma.”Journal of Criminal Justice16(4):291-302.
19.
Clear, Todd R.
1987. “Helping, Punishing and Controlling: The Use (and Misuse) of Conditions in Community Supervision.” Paper presented to the American Society of Criminology, Montreal, Canada, November.
20.
Clear, Todd R.1988. “Statistical Prediction in Corrections.”Research in Corrections1(1):1-40.
21.
Clear, Todd R.Suzanne Flynn
, and Carol Shapiro. 1987. “Intensive Supervision in Probation: A Comparison of Three Projects.” In Intermediate Punishments: Intensive Supervision, Home Confinement and Electronic Surveillance, edited by B. McCarthy. Monsey, NY: Willow Tree Press.
22.
Clear, Todd R.Suzanne Flynn
, Carol Shapiro. and Vincent O'Leary. 1983. Controlling the Offender in the Community. Lexington, MA: Lexington.
23.
Cochran, Donald
, Ronald B. Corbett, Jr., and James M. Byrne. 1986. “Intensive Probation Supervision in Massachusetts: A Case Study in Change.”Federal Probation50:32-41.
24.
Corbett, Ronald P., Jr.
, Donald Cochran, and James M. Byrne. 1987. “Managing Change in Probation: Principles and Practice in the Implementation of an Intensive Probation Supervision Program.” In Intermediate Punishments: Intensive Supervision, Home Confinement and Electronic Surveillance, edited by B. McCarthy. Monsey, NY: Willow Tree Press.
25.
Cressey, Donald
. 1958. “The Nature and Effectiveness of Correctional Techniques.”Law and Contemporary Problems23:754-772.
26.
Cullen, Francis T.
, Gregory A. Clark, and John F. Wozniak. 1985. “Explaining the Get Tough Movement: Can the Public be Blamed?”Federal Probation49:16-24.
27.
Cullen, Francis T.
, Gregory A. Clark, John F. Wozniak. John B. Cullen, and John F. Wozniak. 1988. “Is Rehabilitation Dead? The Myth of the Punitive Public.”Journal of Criminal Justice16:303-317.
Duffee, David E.
and David Clark. 1985. “The Frequency and Classification of the Needs of Offenders in Community Settings.”Journal of Criminal Justice13:243-268.
30.
Durham, Alexis M., III
. 1989. “Judgements of Appropriate Punishment: The Effects of Question Type.”Journal of Criminal Justice17:75-85.
31.
Edelman, Marian Whright
. 1987. Families in Peril: An Agenda for Social Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32.
Erwin, Billie S.
1987. Evaluation of Intensive Probation Supervision in Georgia. Atlanta, Georgia: Department of Corrections.
33.
Erwin, Billie S.
and Lawrence A. Bennett. 1987. “New Dimensions in Probation: Georgia's Experience with Intensive Supervision Probation (ISP).”Research in Brief January. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice.
34.
Etzioni, Amitai
. 1989. “Humble Decision-Making.”Harvard Business ReviewJuly-August: 122-126.
35.
Farrington, David P.
1983. “Randomized Experiments on Crime and Justice.” Pp. 257-308 in Crime and Justice: An Annual Review, edited by Michael Tonry and Norval Morris. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
36.
Garner, Joel H.
and Christy A. Visher. 1988. “Policy Experiments Come of Age.”NIJ Reports211:2-8.
37.
Gendreau, Paul
and Robert R. Ross. 1987. “Revivification of Rehabilitation: Evidence from the 1980s.”Justice Quarterly4(3): 349-408.
38.
Gibbons, Don C.
1988. The Limits of Punishments as Social Policy. New York: Edna McConnel Clark Foundation.
39.
Gottfredson, Don M.
, James O. Finckenauer, and Carol Rauh. 1977. Probation on Trial. Newark, NJ: School of Criminal Justice, Rutgers University.
40.
Gottfredson, Michael
and Travis Hirschi. 1988. “Career Criminals and Selective Incapacitation.” Pp. 199-210 in Controversial Issues in Crime and Justice, edited by Joseph E. Scott and Travis Hirschi. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
41.
Gottfredson, Stephen D.
and Ralph B. Taylor. 1983. The Correctional Crisis: Prison Populations and Public Policy. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice.
42.
Gottfredson, Stephen D.Ralph B. Taylor
. and Ralph B. Taylor. 1986. “Person-Environment Interactions in the Prediction of Recidivism.” In The Social Ecology of Crime, edited by J. M. Byrne and R. J. Sampson. New York: Springer-Verlag.
43.
Hagan, John
and Alberto Palloni. 1988. “Crimes as Social Events in the Life Course: Reconceiving a Criminological Controversy.”Criminology26(1): 87-100.
44.
Jamieson, Katherine M.
and Timothy J. Flanagan, eds. 1989. Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics:1988. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
45.
Kelling, George L.
, Tony Pate, D. Dieckman, and C. Brown. 1974. The Kansas City Preventive Patrol Experiment: A Summary Report. Washington, DC: Police Foundation.
46.
Latessa, Edward J.
and Gennaro F. Vito. 1988. “The Effects of Intensive Supervision on Shock Probationers.”Journal of Criminal Justice16(4):319-330.
47.
Laub, John H.
and Robert J. Sampson. 1988. “Unraveling Families and Delinquency: A Reanalysis of the Gluecks' Data.”Criminology26(3):355-380.
48.
Lauen, Roger L.
1988. Community-managed Corrections. Washington, DC: American Correctional Association.
49.
Lempert, Richard O.
and Christy A. Visher, eds. 1987. “Randomized Field Experiments in Criminal Justice Agencies: A Summary of Workshop Proceeding.”National Research Council, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences, Committee on Research on Law Enforcement and the Administration of Justice (mimeo).
50.
Lipton, Douglas
, Robert Martinson, and Judith Wilks. 1975. The Effectiveness of Correctional Treatment: A Survey of Treatment Evaluation Studies. New York: Praeger.
51.
Martinson, Robert
. 1974. “What Works? Questions and Answers About Prison Reform.” Reprinted in Rehabilitation, Recidivism, and Research, by R. Martinson, T. Palmer and S. Adams. Hackensack, NJ: National Council on Crime and Delinquency.
52.
McGahey, Richard
. 1988. “Jobs and Crime.”Study Guide for the Crime File Video Tape Series. Washington, DC. National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice.
53.
Morris, Norval
. 1987. “Alternatives to Imprisonment: Failures and Prospects.”Criminal Justice Research Bulletin3(7):1-6.
54.
Morris, Norval
and Michael Tonry. 1990. Between Prison and Probation: Intermediate Punishments in a Rational Sentencing System. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
55.
Musheno, Michael C.
, Dennis J. Palumbo, Steven Maynard-Moody, and James P. Levine. 1989. “Community Corrections as an Organizational Innovation: What Works and Why.”Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency26(2):116-135.
56.
O'Leary, Vincent
and Todd R. Clear. 1984. Directions for Community Corrections in the 1990s. Washington, DC: National Institute of Corrections, U.S. Department of Justice
57.
Orsagh, Thomas
and Mary Ellen Marsden. 1984. Rational Choice Theory and Offender Rehabilitation. Draft final report submitted to National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice under Grant #81-IJ-CX-0061, Washington, DC.
58.
Orsagh, Thomas
and Mary Ellen Marsden. 1985. “What Works When: Rational-Choice Theory and Offender Rehabilitation.”Journal of Criminal Justice13(3):269-278.
59.
Orsagh, Thomas
and Mary Ellen Marsden. 1987. “Inmates and Appropriate Programs — Effective Rehabilitation.”Corrections TodayAugust:174-180.
60.
Parent, Dale
. 1989. Shock Incarceration: An Overview of Existing Programs. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
61.
Patton, Michael Q.
1978. Utilization-Focused Evaluation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
62.
Pearson, Frank S.
1987. Research on New Jersey's Intensive Supervision Program. Final report submitted to National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice under Grant #83-IJ-CX-K027, Washington, DC.
63.
Pearson, Frank S.1988. “Evaluation of New Jersey's Intensive Supervision Program.”Crime and Delinquency34(4):437-448.
64.
Petersilia, Joan M.
1987. Expanding Options for Criminal Sentencing. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
65.
Petersilia, Joan M.1989. “Implementing Randomized Experiments: Lessons From BJA's Intensive Supervision Project.”Evaluation Review13(5):435-459.
66.
Petersilia, Joan M.Susan Turner
, and Joyce Peterson. 1986. Prison Versus Probation in California: Implications for Crime and Offender Recidivism. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
67.
Reiss, Albert J.
1986. “Why are Communities Important in Understanding Crime?” In Communities and Crime, edited by A.J. Reiss and M. Tonry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
68.
Reiss, Albert J., Jr.
and Michael Tonry, eds. 1986. Communities and Crime. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
69.
Rossi, Peter H.
and Howard E. Freeman. 1982. Evaluation: A Systematic Approach. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
70.
Schmidt, Annesley K.
1989. “Electronic Monitoring of Offenders Increases.”NIJ Reports, (2-5). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice.
71.
Sechrest, Lee
, Susan O. White, and Elizabeth D. Brown, eds. 1979. The Rehabilitation of Criminal Offenders: Problems and Prospects. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
72.
Sherman, Lawrence W.
and Richard A. Berk. 1984. “The Specific Deterrent Effects of Arrest for Domestic Assault.”American Sociological Review49:261-272.
73.
Sherman, Lawrence W.Richard A. Berk
. and Ellen C. Cohn. 1989. “The Impact of Research on Legal Policy: The Minneapolis Domestic Violence Experiment.”Law and Society Review23(1):117-127.
74.
Shover, Neal
and Werner J. Einstadter. 1988. Analyzing American Corrections. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
75.
Skovron, Sandra Evans
. 1988. “Prison Crowding: The Dimensions of the Problem and Strategies of Population Control.” Pp. 183-198 in Controversial Issues in Crime and Justice, edited by Joseph E. Scott and Travis Hirschi. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
76.
Smith, Douglas A.
and Patrick P. Gartin. 1989. “Specifying Specific Deterrence: The Influence of Arrest on Future Criminal Activity.”American Sociological Review54:94-105.
77.
Spangenberg Associates
. 1987. Assessment of the Massachusetts Probation System. Prepared for the Office of the Chief Administrative Justice of the Trial Court. Newton, MA: Spangenberg Group.
78.
Stark, Rodney
. 1987. “Deviant Places: A Theory of the Ecology of Crime.”Criminology25(4):893-910.
79.
Thomson, Doug
. 1984. “Prospects for Justice Model Probation.” Pp. 101-135 in Probation and Justice: Reconsideration of Mission, edited by Paul D. McAnany, Doug Thomson, and David Fogel. Cambridge, MA: Oelgeschlager, Gunn and Hain.
80.
Tonry, Michael H.
1987. Sentencing Reform Impacts. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice.
81.
Tonry, Michael H.Richard Will
. 1988. Intermediate Sanctions. Preliminary report to the National Institute of Justice. Washington, DC.
82.
Twain, David
. 1983. Creating Change in Social Settings. New York: Prager.
83.
U.S. Department of Justice
. 1987. Intensive Supervision Probation and Parole (ISP). Program Brief prepared by the Bureau of Justice Assistance, Office of Justice Programs in conjunction with regulations implementing the Justice Assistance Act of 1984.
84.
U.S. General Accounting Office
. 1988. Prison Boot Camps: Too Early to Measure Effectiveness. Briefing report to the Honorable Lloyd Bentsen, U.S. Senate, September.
85.
Visher, Christy
. 1988. Randomized Field Experiments in Criminal Justice Agencies: Summary of Conference Proceedings. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice.
86.
von Hirsch, Andrew
. 1985. Past or Future Crimes. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
87.
von Hirsch, Andrew
, Martin Wasik, and Judith Greene. 1989. “Punishments in the Community and the Principles of Desert.”Rutgers Law Journal20(3): 595-618.
88.
Wasik, Martin
and Andrew von Hirsch. 1988. “Non-Custodial Penalties and the Principles of Desert.”Criminal Law ReviewSeptember: 555-572.
89.
Wilson, James Q.
1986. “What Works? Revisited: New Findings on Criminal Rehabilitations.” Pp. 327-341 in The Dilemmas of Punishment: Readings in Contemporary Corrections, edited by Kenneth C. Haas and Geoffrey P. Alpert. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.
