With his theory of differential association, Sutherland attempted to identify universal mechanisms that explain the genesis of crime regardless of the specific concrete structural, social, and individual conditions involved. In this article, I discuss the development of the theory and then assess its strengths and weaknesses. After finding Kornhauser's (1978) influential critique of differential association theory to be oversimplified and misguided, I review recent empirical tests. I argue that the theory appears supported, but requires additional research to specify the concrete content of its abstract principles. Such respecification will improve the theory's predictions, empirical tests, and implications for public policy. I conclude by proposing several avenues for theoretical and empirical research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Akers, Ronald L.
1973. Deviant Behavior: A Social Learning Approach. 1st ed.Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
2.
Akers, Ronald L.
1977. Deviant Behavior: A Social Learning Approach. 2nd ed.Belmont CA: Wadsworth.
3.
Akers, Ronald L.
1985. Deviant Behavior: A Social Learning Approach. 3rd ed.Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
4.
Akers, Ronald L.Marvin D. Krohn
, Lonn Lanza-Kaduce, and Marcia Radosevich. 1979. “Social Learning and Deviant Behavior: A General Test of a Specific Theory.”American Sociological Review44:635-655.
5.
Andrews, D. A.1980. “Some Experimental Investigations of the Principles of Differential Association Through Deliberate Manipulations of the Structure of Service Systems.”American Sociological Review45:448-462.
6.
Aultman, Madeline G.1979. “Delinquency Causation: A Typological Comparison of Path Models.”Journals of Criminal Law and Criminology70:152-163.
7.
Bandura, Albert
. 1969. Principles of Behavior Modification. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
8.
Bandura, Albert
. 1986. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
9.
Burgess, Robert L.
and Ronald L. Akers. 1966. “A Differential Association-Reinforcement Theory of Criminal Behavior.”Social Problems14:128-147.
10.
Cohen, Albert K.
1955. Delinquent Boys: The Culture of the Gang. New York: Free Press.
11.
Cohen, Albert K.
and James F. Short. 1958. “Research in Delinquent Subcultures.”Journal of Social Issues14:20-37.
12.
Cohen, Albert K.
and James F. Short. 1966. “Juvenile Delinquency.” Pp. 84-135 in Contemporary Social Problems, edited by Robert K. Merton and Richard A. Nisbet. 2nd ed.New York: Harcourt Brace.
13.
Cohen, Lawrence E.
and Marcus Felson. 1979. “Social Change and Crime Rate Trends.”American Sociological Review44:588-608.
14.
Clinard, Marshall
and Peter C. Yaeger. 1980. Corporate Crime. New York: Free Press.
15.
Cloward, Richard
. 1959. “Illegitimate Means, Anomie, and Deviant Behavior.”American Sociological Review24:164-177.
16.
Cloward, Richard
. and Lloyd Ohlin. 1960. Delinquency and Opportunity. New York: Free Press.
17.
Colvin, Mark
and John Pauly. 1983. “A Critique of Criminology: Toward an Integrated Structural-Marxist Theory of Delinquency Production.”American Journal of Sociology89:513-551.
18.
Cressey, Donald R.1952. “Application and Verification of the Differential Association Theory.”Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science43:43-52.
19.
Cressey, Donald R.
1953. Other People's Money. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
20.
Cressey, Donald R.1954. “The Differential Association Theory and Compulsive Crimes.”Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology45:29-40.
21.
Cressey, Donald R.1955. “Changing Criminals: The Application of the Theory of Differential Association.”American Journal of Sociology61:116-120.
22.
Cressey, Donald R.1960. “Epidemiology and Individual Conduct: A Case from Criminology.”Pacific Sociological Review3:47-58.
23.
Cressey, Donald R.
1964. Delinquency, Crime and Differential Association. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
24.
Cressey, Donald R.
1968. “Culture Conflict, Differential Association, and Normative Conflict.” Pp. 43-54 in Crime and Culture, edited by Marvin E. Wolfgang. New York: John Wiley.
25.
Cressey, Donald R.1979. “Fifty Years of Criminology: From Sociological Theory to Political Control.”Pacific Sociological Review22:457-480.
26.
Cullen, Francis T.
1984. Rethinking Crime and Deviance Theory. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allanheld.
27.
Elliott, Delbert S.
, Suzanne S. Ageton, and Rachelle J. Canter. 1979. “An Integrated Theoretical Perspective on Delinquent Behavior.”Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency16:3-27.
28.
Elliott, Delbert S.
, David Huizinga, and Suzanne S. Ageton. 1985. Explaining Delinquency and Drug Use. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
29.
Empey, LaMar T.
and Maynard L. Erickson. 1972. The Provo Experiment: Evaluating Community Control of Delinquency. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
30.
Gibbons, Don C.1971. “Observations on the Study of Crime Causation.”American Journal of Sociology77:262-278.
31.
Gibbs, Jack P.“The State of Criminology Theory.”Criminology25:821-840.
32.
Ginsberg, Irving J.
and James R. Greenley. 1978. “Competing Theories of Marijuana Use: A Longitudinal Study.”Journal of Health and Social Behavior19:22-34.
33.
Glaser, Daniel
. 1956. “Criminality Theories and Behavioral Images.”American Journal of Sociology61:433-444.
34.
Glaser, Daniel
. 1960. “Differential Association and Criminological Prediction.”Social Problems8:6-14.
35.
Glaser, Daniel
. 1962. “The Differential Association Theory of Crime.” Pp. 425-442 in Human Behavior and Social Processes, edited by A. M. Rose. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
36.
Glaser, Daniel
. 1978. Crime in Our Changing Society. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
37.
Glaser, Daniel
. 1979. “A Review of Crime-Causation Theory and Its Application.” Pp. 203-238 in Crime and Justice: An Annual Review of Research, edited by Norval Morris and Michael Tonry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
38.
Glueck, Sheldon
. 1956. “Theory and Fact in Criminology.”British Journal of Delinquency7:92-109.
39.
Glueck, Sheldon
. and Eleanor T. Glueck. 1950. Unraveling Juvenile Delinquency. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
40.
Griffin, Brenda S.
and Charles T. Griffin. 1978. “Drug Use and Differential Association.”Drug Forum7:1-8.
41.
Groves, W. Byron
and Robert J. Sampson. 1987. “Traditional Contributions to Radical Criminology.”Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency24:181-214.
42.
Hagan, John, A.R. Gillis
, and John Simpson. 1985. “The Class Structure of Gender and Delinquency: Toward a Power Control Theory of Common Delinquent Behavior.”American Journal of Sociology90:1151-1178.
43.
Hawkins, J. David
and Joseph G. Weis. 1985. “The Social Development Model: An Integrated Approach to Delinquency Production.”Journal of Primary Prevention6:73-97.
44.
Hepburn. John R.1976. “Testing Alternative Models of Delinquency Causation.”Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology67:450-460.
45.
Hirschi, Travis
. 1969. Cause of Delinquency. Berkeley: Free Press.
46.
Hirschi, Travis
. 1979. “Separate and Unequal is Better.”Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency16:34-38.
47.
Hirschi, Travis
. and Michael Gottfredson. 1979. “Introduction: The Sutherland Tradition in Criminology.” Pp. 7-19 in Understanding Crime: Current Theory and Research, edited by Travis Hirschi and Michael Gottfredson. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
48.
Hirschi, Travis
. and Michael Gottfredson. 1986. “The Distinction Between Crime and Criminality.” In Critique and Explanation: Essays in Honor Gwen Nettler, edited by T. F. Hartnagel and R. A. Silverman. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
49.
Jackson, Elton F.
, Charles R. Tittle, and Mary Jean Burke. 1986. “Offense-Specific Models of the Differential Association Process.”Social Problems33:335-356.
50.
Jeffrey, C. R.1965. “Criminal Behavior and Learning Theory.”Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science56:294-300.
51.
Jensen, Gary F.1972. “Parents, Peers, and Delinquent Action: A Test of the Differential Association Perspective.”American Journal of Sociology78:562-575.
52.
Johnson, Richard E.1979. “Are Adolescent Theft, Vandalism, and Assault Due to the Same Causal Processes?”International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice3:59-68.
53.
Johnson, Richard E.
, Anastasios C. Marcos, and Stephen J. Bahr. 1987. “The Role of Peers in the Complex Etiology of Adolescent Drug Use.”Criminology25:323-340.
54.
Kobrin, Solomon
. 1951. “The Conflict of Values in Delinquency Areas.”American Sociological Review16:653-651.
55.
Kornhauser, Ruth R.
1963. “Theoretical Issues in the Sociological Study of Juvenile Delinquency.” Unpublished manuscript, Center for the Study of Law and Society, Berkeley.
56.
Kornhauser, Ruth R.
1978. Social Sources of Delinquency. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
57.
Krohn, Marvin D.
1974. “An Investigation of the Effect of Parental and Peer Associations on Marijuana Use: An Empirical Test of Differential Association Theory.” Pp. 75-87 in Crime and Delinquency: Dimensions of Deviance, edited by Marc Reidel and Terrence Thornberry. New York: Prager.
58.
Krohn, Marvin D.1986. “The Web of Conformity: A Network Approach to the Explanation of Delinquent Behavior.”Social Problems33:581-593.
59.
Krohn, Marvin D.Lonn Lanza-Kaduce
, and Ronald L. Akers. 1984. “Community Context and Theories of Deviant Behavior: An Examination of Social Learning and Social Bonding Theories.”Sociological Quarterly25:353-371.
60.
Krohn, Marvin D.
, William F. Skinner, James L. Massey, and Ronald L. Akers. 1985. “Social Learning Theory and Adolescent Cigarette Smoking: A Longitudinal Study.”Social Problems:455-473.
61.
Lindesmith, Alfred R.1938. “A Sociological Theory of Drug Addiction.”American Journal of Sociology43:593-613.
62.
Luckenbill, David F.1977. “Criminal Homicide as a Situated Transaction.”Social Problems25:176-186.
63.
Matsueda, Ross L.1982. “Testing Control Theory and Differential Association: A Causal Modeling Approach.”American Sociological Review47:489-504.
64.
Matsueda, Ross L.
1988. “A Structural-Symbolic Interactionist Theory of Delinquency.” Unpublished manuscript. Department of Sociology, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
65.
Matsueda, Ross L.
and Karen Heimer. 1987. “Race, Family Structure, and Delinquency: A Test of Differential Association and Social Control Theories.”American Sociological Review53:826-840.
66.
Mead, George Herbert
. 1934. Mind, Self and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
67.
Merton, Robert K.1938. “Social Structure and Anomie.”American Sociological Review3:672-682.
68.
Michael, J.
and M. J. Adler. 1971. Crime, Law, and Social Science. Montclair: Patterson-Smith.
69.
Orcutt, James D.1987. “Differential Association and Marijuana Use: A Closer Look at Sutherland (With a Little Help from Becker).”Criminology25:341-358.
70.
Pearson, Frank S.
and Neil Alan Weiner. 1985. “Toward an Integration of Criminological Theories.”Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology76:116-150.
71.
Platt, Anthony
. 1969. The Child Savers. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
72.
Reiss, Albert J., Jr.
and Lewis Rhodes. 1964. “An Empirical Test of Differential Association Theory.”Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency1:5-18.
73.
Schwendinger, Herman
and Julia R. Schwendinger. 1985. Adolescent Subcultures and Delinquency. New York: Praeger.
74.
Scully, Diana
and Joseph Marolla. 1984. “Convicted Rapists' Vocabulary of Motives: Excuses and Justifications.”Social Problems31:530-544.
75.
Sellin, Thorsten
. 1938. Culture Conflict and Crime. New York: Social Science Research Council.
76.
Shaw, Clifford R.
and Henry D. McKay. 1931. Social Factors in Juvenile Delinquency. Vol. 2 of Report on the Causes of Crime. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
77.
Shaw, Clifford R.
and Henry D. McKay. 1969. Juvenile Delinquency and Urban Areas. Rev. ed.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
78.
Shibutani, Tomatsu
. 1986. Social Processes. Berkeley: University of California Press.
79.
Short, James F., Jr.1957. “Differential Association and Delinquency.”Social Problems4:233-239.
80.
Short, James F., Jr.1958. “Differential Association With Delinquent Friends and Delinquent Behavior.”Pacific Sociological Review1:20-25.
81.
Short, James F., Jr.1960. “Differential Association as a Hypothesis: Problems of Empirical Testing.”Social Problems8:14-25.
82.
Short, James F., Jr.
1974. “Collective Behavior, Crime and Delinquency.” Pp. 403-449 in Handbook of Criminology, edited by Daniel Glaser. Chicago: Rand McNally.
83.
Short, James F., Jr.1979. “On the Etiology of Delinquent Behavior.”Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency16:28-33.
84.
Short, James F., Jr.
and Fred L. Strodtbeck. 1965. Group Process and Gang Delinquency. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
85.
Shover, Neal1983. “The Later Stages of Ordinary Property Offender Careers.”Social Problems31:208-218.
86.
Shover, Neal
1985. Aging Criminals. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
87.
Silberman, Matthew
. 1976. “Toward a Theory of Criminal Deterrence.”American Sociological Review41:442-461.
88.
Stanfield, Robert E.1966. “The Interaction of Family Variables and Gang Variables in the Aetiology of Delinquency.”Social Problems13:411-417.
89.
Strickland, Donald E.1982. “Social Learning and Deviant Behavior: A Comment and Critique.”American Sociological Review47:162-167.
90.
Stryker, Sheldon
. 1980. Symbolic Interactionism. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings.
91.
Sutherland, Edwin H.1926. “The Biological and Sociological Processes.”Publications of the American Sociological Society32:58-65.
92.
Sutherland, Edwin H.
1933. Principles of Criminology. 2nd ed.Philadelphia: Lippincott.
93.
Sutherland, Edwin H.
1937. The Professional Thief. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
94.
Sutherland, Edwin H.
1939. Principles of Criminology. 3rd ed.Philadelphia: Lippincott.
95.
Sutherland, Edwin H.
1947. Principles of Criminology. 4th ed.Philadelphia: Lippincott.
96.
Sutherland, Edwin H.
1949. White Collar Crime. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
97.
Sutherland, Edwin H.
1973a. “Crime and the Conflict Process.” Pp. 99-111 in Edwin H. Sutherland on Analyzing Crime, edited by Karl Schuessler. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
98.
Sutherland, Edwin H.
1973b. “The Prison as a Criminological Laboratory.” Pp. 247-256 in Edwin H. Sutherland on Analyzing Crime, edited by Karl Schuessler. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
99.
Sutherland, Edwin H.
1973c. “Wartime Crime.” Pp. 120-130 in Edwin H. Sutherland on Analyzing Crime, edited by Karl Schuessler. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
100.
Sutherland, Edwin H.
1973d. “Critique of the Theory.” Pp. 30-41 in Edwin H. Sutherland on Analyzing Crime, edited by Karl Schuessler. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
101.
Sutherland, Edwin H.
1973e. “Susceptibility and Differential Association.” Pp. 42-43 in Edwin H. Sutherland on Analyzing Crime, edited by Karl Schuessler. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
102.
Sutherland, Edwin H.
and Donald R. Cressey. 1978. Criminology. 10th ed.Philadelphia: Lippincott.
103.
Sykes, Gresham
and David Matza. 1957. “Techniques of Neutralization: A Theory of Delinquency.”American Sociological Review22:664-670.
104.
Thomas, William I.
and Florian Znaniecki. 1927. The Polish Peasant in Europe and America. New York: Knopf.
105.
Thornberry, Terrence
. 1987. “Toward an Interactional Theory of Delinquency.”Criminology25:863-891.
106.
Tittle, Charles R.
, Mary Jean Burke, and Elton F. Jackson. 1986. “Modeling Sutherland's Theory of Differential Association: Toward an Empirical Clarification.”Social Forces65:405-432.
107.
Voss, Harwin, L.1964. “Differential Association and Reported Delinquent Behavior: A Replication.”Social Problems12:78-85.
108.
Voss, Harwin, L.1969. “Differential Association and Containment Theory: A Theoretical Convergence.”Social Forces47:381-391.
109.
Weinberg, S. Kirson
. 1966. “Personality and Method in Differential Association.”Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency3:165-172.
110.
Wirth, Louis
. 1964. “Culture Conflict and Miscondut.” Pp. 229-243 in Louis Wirth on Cities and Social Life, edited by Albert J. Reiss, Jr.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
111.
Wolfgang, Marvin E.
and Franco Ferracutti. 1967. The Subculture of Violence. London: Travistock.
112.
Yamaguchi, Kazuo
and Denise B. Kandel. 1985. “On the Resolution of Role Incompatibility: A Life Event History Analysis of Family Roles and Marijuana Use.”American Journal of Sociology90:1284-1325.
