Making correct predictions is only one, and probably not the most important, of the objectives for security classification. In this article, inherent limitations to predictive ability are discussed and four other objectives are emphasized. These objectives are as follows: making classification decisions the right way, making decisions stick, managing decisions, and promoting positive human interaction. The discussion focuses on the utility of objective instruments for achieving those objectives.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alexander, J.
1982 “Security classification in New York State,” pp. 93-108 in L. Rans (ed.) Classification as a Management Tool: Theories and Models for Decision-Makers. College Park, MD: American Correctional Association.
2.
Alexander, J.
1984 Security Reclassification Guideline Evaluation. Albany: New York State Department of Correctional Services.
3.
Chapman, W.
and J. Alexander 1981a Adjustment to Prison: A Review of Inmate Characteristics Associated with Misconduct, Victimization and Self-Injury in Confinement. Albany: New York State Department of Correctional Services.
4.
Chapman, W.
and J. Alexander 1981b Interrater Reliability Study of Initial Security Classification Guideline for Males. Albany: New York State Department of Correctional Services.
5.
Davis, K. C.
1969 Discretionary Justice: A Preliminary Inquiry. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State Univ. Press.
6.
Dawes, R. M.
1982 “The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making,” pp. 391-407 in D. Kahnemanet al. (eds.) Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
7.
Drucker, P.
1973 Management: Tasks, Responsibilities, Practices. New York: Harper & Row.
8.
Gettinger, P.1982“Objective classification: catalyst for change.”Corrections Magazine8, 3: 24-37.
9.
Hackman, R.
and G. R. Oldham 1979 Work Redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
10.
Hand, L.
1958 The Bill of Rights. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
11.
Larimore, K. E.
and B. Hutchinson 1981 “Risk assessment, classification, and security designation,” in Classification, American Correctional Association Monographs, Series 1, Number 4. College Park, MD: American Correctional Association.
12.
Levinson, R.
and J. D. Williams1979“Inmate classification: security/custody considerations,”Federal Probation (March): 37-43.
13.
National Institute of Corrections
1982 Classification: Principles, Models and Guidelines. Washington, DC: Department of Justice.
14.
New York City Criminal Justice Agency
1980 Sentenced Inmate Data: A Study of Information Transmitted from New York City to the New York State Department of Correctional Services. New York: Author.
15.
Solomon, L.
and S. C. Baird1981“Classification: past failures, future potentials.”Corrections Today43, 3: 4.
16.
Toch, H.1985“Exchange III between Hans Toch and Leslie Wilkins.”Criminal Justice and Behavior12, 1: 3-16.
17.
Tversky, A.
and D. Kahneman1974“Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases.”Science185: 1124-1131.
