Official Intervention,Diversion from the Juvenile Justice System,and Dynamics of Human Services Work: Effects of a Reform Goal Based on Labeling Theory
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online April, 1986
Official Intervention,Diversion from the Juvenile Justice System,and Dynamics of Human Services Work: Effects of a Reform Goal Based on Labeling Theory
This study examines the relationship between the degree of official intervention in the lives of juveniles charged with delinquent offenses and their diversion status. We draw upon official justice system data, data from a large diversion project that operated in eight counties, and data collected through field observations of the diversion program under study. Our findings show that the official intervention process is as intrusive for youth diverted out of the juvenile justice system for services as it is for those youth who are not diverted. Some part of the failure of one program on this reform goal may be explained by a general resistance to change among juvenile court officials, but it is clear from field observation data that the practices and professional ideologies of human services workers also contribute substantially to the failure.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Austin, J.
and B. Krisberg1981“Wider, stronger, and different nets: the dialectics of criminal justice reform.”J. of Research in Crime and Delinquency18 (January): 165-196.
2.
Blomberg, T.1977“Diversion and accelerated social control.”J. of Criminal Law and Criminology68 (June): 274-282.
3.
Blomberg, T.
1980 “Widening the net: an anomaly in the evaluation of diversion program,” in M. W. Klein and K. S. Teilmann (eds.) Handbook of Criminal Justice Evaluation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage,.
4.
Blomberg, T.1983“Diversion's disparate results and unresolved questions: an integrative evaluation perspective.”J. of Research in Crime and Delinquency (January): 24-38.
5.
Bullington, B.
, J. Sprowls, D. Katkin, and M. Phillips1978“A critique of diversionary juvenile justice.”Crime & Delinquency24: 59-71.
6.
Carter, R. M.
and M. W. Klein 1976 Back on the Street: The Diversion of Juvenile Offenders. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
7.
Casper, J. D.
and D. Brereton1984“Evaluating criminal justice reforms.”Law and Society Rev.18: 121-144.
8.
Casper, J. D.
, D. Brereton, and D. Neal 1982 “The implementation of the California determinate sentencing law.” U.S. Department of Justice. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
9.
Chen, H.
and P. H. Rossi1980“The multi-goal, theory-driven approach to evaluation: a model linking basic and applied social science.”Social Forces59, 1: 106-120.
10.
Church, T. W., Jr.1976“Plea-bargains, concessions, and the courts: analysis of a quasi-experiment.”Law and Society Rev.10: 377.
11.
Cressey, D. E.
and R. A. McDermott 1973 Diversion: Background and Definition. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.
12.
Decker, S. H.1985“A systematic analysis of diversion: net widening and beyond.”J. of Criminal Justice13: 207-216.
13.
Empey, L.
1982 American Delinquency: Its Meaning and Construction. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.
14.
Frazier, C.1983“Evaluation of youth services programs: problems and prospects from a case study.”Youth & Society14 (March): 335-362.
15.
Frazier, C.
, P. Richards, and R. H. Potter1983“Juvenile diversion and net widening: toward a clarification of assessment strategies.”Human Organization42 (Summer): 115-122.
16.
Gibbons, D.
and G. Blake1976“Evaluating the impact of juvenile diversion programs.”Crime & Delinquency22: 411-420.
17.
Gottfredson, M. R.
, M. A. Chandler, and L. E. Cohen1983“Legal aim, discretion, and social control: a case study of the Federal Youth Corrections Act.”Criminology21 (February): 95-118.
18.
Heumann, M.
and C. Loftin1979“Mandatory sentencing and the abolition of plea-bargaining: the Michigan felony firearms statute.”Law and Society Rev.13: 393.
19.
Klein, M.1974“Labelling, deterrence, and recidivism: a study of police dispositions of juvenile offenders.”Social Problems22 (December): 292-303.
20.
Klein, M.1976“Issues and realities in police diversion programs.”Crime & Delinquency22, 4: 421-427.
21.
Klein, M.
1979 “Deinstitutionization and diversion of juvenile offenders: a litany of impediments,” in N. Morris and M. Tonry (eds.) Crime and Justice. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
22.
Klein, M.
, K. Teilmann, J. Styles, S. Lincoln, and S. L. Rosenwig 1976 “The explosion in police diversion programs: evaluating the structural dimensions of a social fad,” pp. 101-119 in M. Klein (ed.) The Juvenile Justice System. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
23.
Kobrin, S.
and M. W. Klein 1983 Community Treatment of Juvenile Offenders: The DSO Experiments. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
24.
Krisberg, B.
and I. Schwartz 1982 Rethinking Juvenile Justice. San Francisco: National Council on Crime and Delinquency.
25.
Lemert, E. M.
1951 Social Pathology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
26.
Lemert, E. M.
1967a “The juvenile court—quest and realities,” pp. 91-106 in the President's Commission on Law Enforcement and the Administration of Justice, Task Force Report: Juvenile Delinquency and Youth Crime. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
27.
Lemert, E. M.
1967b Human Deviance, Social Problems and Social Control. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
28.
Lemert, E. M.
1971 Instead of Court: Diversion in Juvenile Justice. National Institute of Mental Health. Health Service Publication No. 2127, Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
29.
Lemert, E. M.1974“Beyond Mead: the societal reaction to deviance.”Social Problems21, 4: 459.
30.
Lemert, E. M.1981“Diversion in juvenile justice: what hath been wrought.”J. of Research in Crime and Delinquency18 (January): 35-46.
31.
Lipsky, M.
1980 Street-Level Bureaucracy. New York: Russell Sage.
32.
Loftin, C.
, M. Heumann, and D. McDowall1983“Mandatory sentencing and firearms violence: evaluating an alternative to gun control.”Law and Society Rev.17: 287.
Mather, L. M.
1979 Plea Bargaining or Trial? The Process of Criminal Case Disposition. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
35.
Nejelski, P.1976“Diversion: unleashing the hound of heaven?”Crime & Delinquency (October): 394-420.
36.
Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
1976 “Diversion of youth from the juvenile justice system.”Program Announcement. U.S. Department of Justice, April.
37.
Palmer, T. B.
and R. V. Lewis1981“A differential approach to juvenile justice.”J. of Research in Crime and Delinquency17 (July): 209-227.
38.
President's Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice
1967 Task Force Report: Juvenile Delinquency and Youth Crime. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
39.
Rains, P.1984“Juvenile justice and the boys' farm: serving a court created population crisis, 1909-1949.”Social Problems31 (June): 500-514.
40.
Rojek, D. G.
and M. O. Erikson1982“Reforming the juvenile justice system: the diversion of status offenders.”Law and Society Rev.16, 2: 241-264.
41.
Rosett, A.
and D. Cressey 1976 Justice by Consent: Plea Bargaining in the American Courthouse. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott.
42.
Scheff, T.
1984 Being Mentally Ill. New York: Aldine.
43.
Schur, E.
1973 Radical Non-Intervention: Rethinking the Delinquency Problem. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
44.
Tannenbaum, F.
1938 Crime and the Community. New York: Ginn and Co.
45.
Youth Development Delinquency Prevention Administration
1972 “Youth services systems.”Delinquency Prevention Reporter, Youth Development and Delinquency Prevention Administration, U.S. Department of Health Education and Welfare July/August. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
