In the last decade, classification systems have become more common in probation and parole agencies. However, the potential benefits of classification have not been achieved in many agencies because the classification process is often misunderstood. In order to obtain the maximum benefits from the classification process, managers need to approach classification as a tool designed for their own particular organization's needs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Arling, G.
and K. Lerner 1980 Client Management Classification. Washington, DC: National Institute of Corrections.
2.
Babst, D. V.
and M. Coval1973“Computing mean cost ratings (MCR).”J. of Research in Crime and Delinquency10 (January): 22-29.
3.
Baird, S. C.et al.
1979 The Wisconsin Case Classification Staff Deployment Project: A Two-Year Follow-Up. Madison, WI: Bureau of Community Corrections.
4.
Banks, J.
1984 “Validation of risk and needs assessment instruments.” Report to the Georgia Department of Offender Rehabilitation, May 14.
5.
Banks, J.et al.
1977 Phase I Evaluation of Intensive Special Probation. Washington, DC: Department of Justice.
6.
Bemus, B.
, G. Arling, and P. Quigly 1983 Workload Measures for Probation and Parole. Washington, DC: National Institute of Corrections.
7.
Bohnstedt, M.et al.
1979 Probation/Parole Level of Supervision Servicebook, Volume 2 of Classification Instruments for Criminal Justice Decisions. Washington, DC: National Institute of Corrections. (draft)
8.
Clear, T. R.
and K. W. Gallagher1983“Screening devices in probation and parole: management problems.”Evaluation Rev.7 (April): 217-234.
9.
Clear, T. R.
and K. W. Gallagher n.d. New Jersey Case Management Project. Report of the School of Criminal Justice, Rutgers University. (mimeo)
10.
Clear, T. R.
and V. O'Leary 1982 Controlling the Offender in the Community. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
11.
Clear, T. R.et al.1981“Objectives based Case Management.”Criminal Justice J.5 (Fall).
12.
Comptroller General1976“State and local probation: systems in crisis.”Report to Congress, May 27.
13.
Davis, G. B.
1974 Management Information Systems. New York: McGraw-Hill.
14.
Duffee, D. E.
1982 Explaining Criminal Justice. Cambridge, MA: Olegeschlager, Gunn and Hain.
15.
Duncan, O. D.
and B. Duncan1955“A methodological analysis of segregation indexes.”Amer. Soc. Rev.20 (April): 210-217.
16.
Eaglin, J. B.
and P. A. Lombard 1982 A Validation and Comparative Evaluation of Four Predictive Devices for Classifying Federal Probation Caseloads. Washington, DC: Federal Judicial Center.
17.
Ford, R.
and S. Johnson 1977 Probation Prediction Models and Recidivism. Springfield: Illinois Department of Corrections. (mimeo)
18.
Glaser, D.
1964 The Effectiveness of a Prison and Parole System. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
19.
Gottfredson, S. D.
and D. M. Gottfredson1981“Risk screening: a comparison of methods.”Criminal Justice and Behavior8, 1: 35-49.
20.
Hold, R. R.1958“Clinical and statistical prediction: a reformulation and some new data.”J. of Abnormal and Social Psychology56: 1-12.
21.
Lipsky, M.
1980 Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage.
22.
McCleary, R.
1978 Dangerous Men: The Sociology of Parole. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
23.
Meehl, P. E.1959“A comparison of clinicians with five statistical methods of identifying psychotic MMPI profiles.”J. of Consulting Psychology6: 102.
24.
National Institute of Corrections
1981 Model Probation and Parole Management Systems. Washington, DC: Author. (mimeo)
25.
New York City Department of Probation
n.d. “Analysis of impact of violence history item.”Internal memorandum, Division of Research and Planning.
26.
Niethercutt, M.
and D. M. Gottfredson 1973 Caseload Size Variation and Difference in Probation Parole Performance. Washington, DC: National Institute of Juvenile Justice.
27.
Quinn, T. J.1984“Focus for the future: accountability in sentencing.”Federal Probation (March).
28.
Palmer, T.1975“Martinson revisited.”J. of Research in Crime and Delinquency12, 2: 230.
29.
Robison, J.
and P. Takagi 1976 “Parole violators as organizations rejects,” in R. Carter and L. T. Wilkins (eds.) Probation, Parole and Community Corrections. New York: John Wiley.
30.
Ross, B.
and P. Gendreau 1980 Effective Corrections. Toronto: Butterworths.
31.
Studt, E.
1972 Surveillance and Service in Parole. Los Angeles: University of California.
32.
Thompson, J. D.
1967 Organizations in Action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
33.
Vaill, P.1975“Reflections on technology.”Social Change5: 12-20.
34.
Van Dine, S.
n.d. “Evaluation of risk screening in Ohio.” Internal staff memo, Ohio Adult Authority.
35.
Warren, M. Q.1973“All things being equal...”Criminal Law Bull.9, 2: 483.
36.
Wright, K. N.
, T. R. Clear, and P. Dickson1984“Universal applicability of probation risk assessment instruments.”Criminology22 (February): 113-134.
