Using data from the final wave of a longitudinal study of males, this article examines propositions derived from feminist literature regarding male attributes that may distinguish sexually aggressive males from others. The findings suggest that the most important factor is the presence of sexually aggressive friends. In its effect this factor interacts with (1) attitudes legitimizing sexual aggression against women and (2) service in Vietnam. More general attitudes toward women, alienation, and education appear to have indirect effects. Overall, the findings are consistent with arguments in the feminist literature concerning influences on rape or sexually aggressive behavior.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abel, G. G.
, J. V. Becker, and L. J. Skinner1980“Aggressive behavior and sex.”Psychiatric Clinics of North America3, 1: 133-151.
2.
Abel, G. G.
, E. B. Blanchard, and J. V. Becker 1976 “Psychological treatment of rapists,” pp. 99-116 in M. J. Walker and S. L. Brodsky (eds.) Sexual Assault: The Victim and the Rapist. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
3.
Abel, G. G.
, E. B. Blanchard, and J. V. Becker 1978 “An integrated treatment program for rapists,” in R. Rada (ed.) Clinical Aspects of the Rapist. New York: Grune and Stratton.
4.
Albin, R. S.1977“Psychological studies of rape.”Signs3: 423-435.
5.
Alder, C. M. 1982 “An exploration of self-reported sexual aggression.” Unpublished dissertation, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon.
6.
Amir, M.
1971 Patterns of Forcible Rape. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
7.
Bart, P. G.1975“Rape doesn't end with a kiss.”Viva2: 39-42, 100-101.
8.
Blau, P. M.
and O. D. Duncan 1967 The American Occupational Structure. New York: John Wiley.
9.
Borus, J. F.1974“Incidence of maladjustments in Vietnam returnees.”Archives of General Psychiatry30: 554-557.
10.
Brady, D.
and L. Rappoport1974“Violence and Vietnam: a comparison between attitudes of civilians and veterans.”Human Relations26: 735-752.
11.
Brownmiller, S.
1975 Against Our Will. Men, Women and Rape. New York: Simon and Schuster.
12.
Burgess, A. W.
and L. Holmstrom 1974 Rape: Victims of Crisis. Bowie, MD: Robert J. Brady.
13.
Chappell, D.
, R. Geis, and G. Geis 1977 Forcible Rape. The Crime, the Victim and the Offender. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.
14.
Cicone, M. V.
and D. Ruble1978“Beliefs about males.”J. of Social Issues34: 5-16.
15.
Clayton, R. R.1972“Premarital sexual intercourse: a substantive test of the contingent consistency model.”J. of Marriage and the Family31: 273-231.
16.
Coventry, G. 1981 “The Vietnam experience and a cohort's transition to adulthood,” unpublished dissertation, University of Oregon.
17.
Curtis, L. A.
1976 “Rape, race and culture: some speculations in search of theory,” pp. 117-134 in M. J. Walker and S. L. Brodsky (eds.) Sexual Assault. The Victim and the Rapist. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
18.
DeLamater, J.
and P. MacCorquodale1975“The effects of interview schedule variations on reported sexual behavior.”Sociological Methods and Research4: 215-236.
19.
Deming, M. B.
and A. Eppy1981“The sociology of rape.”Sociology and Social Research65: 357-380.
20.
Feldman-Summers, S.
1976 “Conceptual and empirical issues associated with rape,” pp. 91-105 in E. C. Viano (ed.) Victims and Society. Washington, DC: Visage Press.
21.
Feldman-Summers, S.
and C. D. Ashworth1981“Factors related to intentions to report a rape.”J. of Social Issues37: 53-69.
22.
Figley, C. R.
1980 “Confused, hated, ignored and dishonored: an introduction to Section II,” pp. 109-115 in C. R. Figley and S. Levintman (eds.) Strangers at Home. Vietnam Veterans Since the War. New York: Praeger.
23.
Fox, R. P.1972“Post-combat adaptational problems.”Comprehensive Psychology13: 435-443.
24.
Gager, N.
and C. Schurr 1976 Sexual Assault: Confronting Rape in America. New York: Grosset and Dunlap.
25.
Gebhard, P.
, J. H. Gagnon, W. B. Pomeroy, and C. V. Christensen 1965 Sexual Offenders: An Analysis of Types. New York: Harper & Row.
26.
Greer, G.1973“Seduction is a four letter word.”Playboy20 (January): 80-82, 164, 178, 224-228.
27.
Griffin, S.
1977 “Rape: the all-American crime,” pp. 47-67 in D. Chappell, R. Geis, and G. Geis (eds.) Forcible Rape. The Crime, the Victim and the Offender. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.
28.
Groth, N. A.
and A. W. Burgess1977“Rape: a sexual diviation.”Amer. J. of Orthopsychiatry47: 400-406.
29.
Groth, N.
, A. Burgess, and L. Holmstrom1977“Rape, power, anger, and sexuality.”Amer. J. of Psychiatry134, 11: 1239-1243.
30.
Hauser, R. M.
and D. L. Featherman 1977 The Process of Stratification. New York: Academic Press.
31.
Kanin, E. J.1967“Reference groups and sex conduct norm violation.”Soc. Q.8: 1504-1695.
32.
Kanin, E. J.1969“Selected dyadic aspects of male sex aggression.”J. of Sex Research5: 12-28.
33.
LeGrande, C. E.1973“Rape and rape laws: sexism in society and law.”California Law Rev.: 61: 919-941.
34.
Levine, S. and J. Koenig 1980 Why Men Rape. Interviews with Convicted Rapists. Toronto, Canada: MacMillan.
35.
Libby, R. W.
and J. E. Carlson1973“A theoretical framework for premarital sexual decisions in the dyad.”Archives of Sexual Behavior2: 365-378.
36.
MacKeller, J.
1975 Rape: The Bait and the Trap. New York: Crown Publishers, Inc.
37.
McCaghy, C. H.
1976 Deviant Behavior Crime, Conflict and Interest Groups. New York: MacMillan.
38.
Medea, A.
and K. Thompson 1974 Against Rape. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
39.
Mirande, A. M.1968“Reference group theory and adolescent sexual behavior.”J. of Marriage and the Family30: 572-577.
40.
National Opinion Research Center
1976 National Data Program for the Social Sciences. Codebook for the Spring 1976 General Social Survey. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
41.
Rabkin, J. G.1979“The epidemiology of forcible rape.”Amer. J. of Orthopsychiatry49: 634-647.
42.
Rainwater, L.
1970 Behind Ghetto Walls: Black Families in a Federal Slum. Chicago: Aldine.
43.
Reynolds, J. M.1974“Rape as social control.”Catalyst8: 62-67.
44.
Rose, V. M.1977“Rape as a social problem: a byproduct of the feminist movement.”Social Problems25: 75-89.
45.
Russell, D.E.H.
1975 The Politics of Rape: The Victim's Perspective. New York: Stein & Day.
46.
Schrag, C. C.
1969. “Critical analysis of sociological theories,” pp. 1241-1289 in D. J. Mulvihill and M. M. Tumin (eds.) National Commission on the Causes and Prevention of Violence. Crimes and Violence: A Staff Report, Vol. 13. Washington, DC: Govt. Printing Office.
47.
Schulz, B.
, G. W. Bohrnstedt, E. F. Borgatta, and R. R. Evans1977“Explaining premarital sexual intercourse among college students: a causal model.”Social Forces56: 148-165.
48.
Scully, D.
and J. Marolla 1981 “Convicted rapists' attitudes toward women and rape.” Paper presented at the First International Interdisciplinary Congress on Women, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
49.
Smithyman, S. D. 1978 “The undetected rapist.” Ph.D. dissertation, Claremont Graduate School.
50.
Stockard, J.
and M. Johnson 1980 Sex Roles. Sex Inequality and Sex Role Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
51.
Sussman, L. and S. Bordwell 1981 The Rapist File. Interviews with Convicted Rapists. New York: Chelsea House.
52.
Temple, M. 1982 “Educational attainment and the stratification process: patterns of college completion.” Unpublished dissertation, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon.
53.
Weis, K.
and S. S. Borges1973“Victimology and rape: the case of the legitimate victim.”Issues in Criminology8: 51-71.
54.
Weis, K.
and S. S. Borges 1976 “Rape as a crime without victims and offenders?” pp. 230-255 in E. Viano (ed.) Victims and Society. Washington, DC: Visage Press.
55.
Williams, J. E.
and K. A. Holmes 1981 The Second Assault: Rape and Public Attitudes. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
