In a study of 32,000 referrals to juvenile court, the effects of a program to deinstitutionalize status offenders on detention decisions, intake screening, and final dispositions were examined. Although the results of a general comparison of preprogram and postprogram court actions showed relatively little change in court policies, the data did indicate a slight general trend toward less use of secure detention, a greater use of informal hearings, and a lower rate of juveniles placed on probation or in institutions. Differential treatment based on race was evident throughout the 5-year period. Whereas the rate of secure detention of black juveniles declined overall, it increased for black status offenders, especially females. There was a substantial decrease in the use of formal hearings and in the severity of final dispositions for all cases involving black juveniles.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Andrews, R. H.
and A. H. Cohn1974“Ungovernability: The unjustifiable jurisdiction.”Yale Law Journal83: 1383-1409.
2.
Arnold, W. R.1971“Race and ethnicity relative to other factors in juvenile court dispositions.”American J. of Sociology77: 211-227.
3.
Bailey, W. C.1981“Preadjudicatory detention in a large metropolitan juvenile court.”Law and Human Behavior5: 19-43.
4.
Black, D. J.
and A. J. Reiss1970“Police Control of Juveniles.”Amer. Soc. Rev.35:63-77.
5.
Black E. T.
and C. P. Smith 1981 Reports of the National Juvenile Justice Assessment Centers: A Preliminary National Assessment of the Numbers and Characteristics of Juveniles Processed in the Juvenile Justice System. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
6.
Bortner, M. A.
1982 Inside a Juvenile Court: The Tarnished Ideal of Individualized Justice. New York: New York Univ. Press.
7.
Bortner, M. A.
and W. L. Reed (forth.) “The preeminence of process: An example of refocused justice research.”Social Sci. Q.
8.
Cohen, L. E.
and J. R. Kluegel1978“Determinants of juvenile court dispositions: Ascriptive and achieved factors in two metropolitan courts.”Amer. Soc. Rev.43: 162-176.
9.
Cohen, L. E.
and J. R. Kluegel1979“Selecting delinquents for adjudication: An analysis of intake screening decisions in two metropolitan juvenile courts.”J. of Research in Crime and Deliquency (January): 143-163.
10.
Costello. J. C.
and N. Worthington1981“Incarcerating status offenders: Attempts to circumvent the juvenile justice and delinquency prevention act.”Harvard Civil Rights—Civil Law Review16, 1: 40-81.
11.
Datesman, S. K.
and F. R. Scarpitti 1980 “Unequal protection for males and females in the juvenile court.” pp. 300-319 in S. K. Datesman and F. S. Scarpitti (eds.), Women, Crime, and Justice. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
12.
Dannefer, D.
and R. K. Schutt1982“Race and juvenile processing in court and police agencies.”Amer. J. of Sociology87: 1113-1132.
13.
Ferdinand, T. N.
and E. G. Luchterhand1970“Inner city youth, the police, the juvenile court, and justice.”Social Problems17: 510-527.
14.
Flicker, B. D.
1977 Standards for Juvenile Justice: A Summary and Analysis. Institute of Judicial Administration and American Bar Association Juvenile Justice Standards Project. Cambridge MA: Ballinger.
15.
Goldman, N.
1963 The Differential Selection of Juvenile Offenders for Court Appearance. New York: National Council on Crime and Delinquency.
16.
Kittrie, N. N.
1971 The Right to Be Different: Deviance and Enforced Therapy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press.
17.
Kobrin, S.
and M. W. Klein 1982 National Evaluation of the Deinstitutionalization of Status Offender Programs. Rockville, MD.: National Criminal Justice Reference Service.
18.
Kramer, J. H.
and D. J. Steffensmeier1978“The differential detention/jailing of juveniles: A comparison of detention and non-detention courts.”Pepperdine Law Rev.5: 795-807.
19.
Kratcoski, P. C.1974“Differential treatment of delinquent boys and girls in juvenile court.”Child Welfare53: 16-22.
20.
Liska, A. E.
and M. Tausig1979“Theoretical interpretation of social class and racial differentials in legal decision-making for juveniles.”Soc. Q.20: 197-207.
21.
Mann, C. R.1979“The differential treatment between runaway boys and girls in juvenile court.”Juvenile and Family Court J. (May): 37-48.
22.
Monahan, T. P.1970“Police dispositions of juvenile offenders: The problem of measurement and a study of Philadelphia data.”Pylon (Summer): 129-141.
23.
Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
1977 Little Sisters and the Law. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Law Enforcement Assistance Administration.
24.
Platt, A. M.
1977 The Child Savers: The Invention of Delinquency. Chicago: Chicago Univ. Press.
25.
Piliavin, I.
and S. Briar1964“Police encounters with juveniles.”Amer. J. of Sociology69: 206-214.
26.
Scarpitti, F. R.
and R. M. Stephenson1971“Juvenile court dispositions: Factors in the decision-making process.”Crime and Delinquency17: 142-151.
27.
Smith, D. D.
1980 Young Female Offenders: Analysis of Differential Handling Based on Sex. Pittsburgh: National Center for Juvenile Justice.
28.
Stehno, S. M.
and T. M. Young 1980 Young Women and the Juvenile Justice System: An Examination of National Data and the Summaries of Fourteen Alternative Programs. Rockville, MD: NCJRS Microfiche Program.
29.
Teilman, K. S.
and P. H. Landry, Jr.1981“Gender bias in juvenile justice.”J. of Research in Crime and Delinquency (January): pp. 47-79.
30.
Terry, R.
1967 “Discrimination in the handling of juvenile offenders by social control agencies,” pp. 78-92 in P. G. Garabdian and D. C. Gibbons (eds.), Becoming Delinquent. Chicago: Aldine.
31.
Thornberry, T. P.1979“Sentencing disparities in the juvenile justice system.”J. of Criminal Law and Criminology70: 164-171.
32.
Vintner, R. D.
and R. C. Sarri 1976 Time Out. A National Survey of Juvenile Correctional Programs. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
33.
Weiner, N. L.
and C. V. Willie1971“Decision by juvenile officers.”Amer. J. of Sociology77: 199-210.
