Research on the measurement of crime seriousness, whether for statistical or research purposes, has generally defined “seriousness” exclusively in terms of the amount of harm actually inflicted, without consideration of the mental state or intentions of the actor. This has been justified on grounds of principle, on the basis of research findings, and for pragmatic reasons. It is posited here that none of these arguments is convincing. Society has a legitimate interest in measuring the amount of harm inflicted by crime, but a basic indicator of criminality must also take the mental element into account.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Akman, D. D.
, R. Figlio, and A. Normandeau1967“Concerning the measurement of delinquency—a rejoinder and beyond.”British J. of Criminology7, 4: 442-449.
2.
Akman, D. D.
, A. Normandeau, and S. Turner1967“The measurement of delinquency in Canada.”J. of Criminal Law, Criminology and Police Science58, 3: 330-337.
3.
Bazak, Y.1969“Retribution as a consideration of sentencing policy.”Delinquency and Society4, 1: 27-32.
4.
Blumstein, A.1974“Seriousness weights in an index of crime.”Amer. Soc. Rev.39: 854-864.
5.
Cooper, H.H.A.1968“Towards a rational doctrine of criminal responsibility.”J. of Criminal Law & Criminology59, 3: 338-346.
6.
Dawson, R. O.
1969 Sentencing: The Decision as to Type, Length and Conditions of Sentence. Boston: Little, Brown.
7.
Doleschal, E.
and L. T. Wilkins 1972 Criminal Statistics. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Mental Health.
8.
Farrer, J. A.
1880 Crimes and Punishments. London: Chatto & Windus.
9.
Fisher, S. Z.
1974 “Criminal liability for negligent conduct in the United States,” in J. N. Hazard and W. J. Wagner (eds.) Law in the United states of America in Social and Technological Revolution. Brussels: Bruylant.
10.
Gardiner, M. R.1976“The renaissance of retribution—an examination of `doing justice.' ”Wisconsin Law Rev.: 781-815.
11.
Gold, M.
and D. J. Reimer1975“Changing patterns of delinquent behavior among Americans 13 through 16 years old: 1967-1972.”Crime and Delinquency Literature7, 4: 483-517.
12.
Goldin, H. E.
1952 Hebrew Criminal Law and Procedure. New York: Twayne.
13.
Gramatica, F.
1963 Principes de Defense Sociale. Paris: Cujas.
14.
Hall, J.
1960 General Principles of Criminal Law. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
15.
Hall, J.1963“Negligent behavior should be excluded from penal liability.”Columbia Law Rev.63: 632-644.
16.
Hart, H.L.A.
1968 Punishment and Responsibility. Oxford: Clarendon.
17.
Heilbrun, A. B., Jr.
, Heilbrun, K. L., and Heilbrun, L. C.1978“Impulsive and premediated homicide: an analysis of subsequent parole risk of the murderer.”J. of Criminal Law & Criminology69, 1: 108-114.
18.
Heller, N.
and J. T. McEwan1973“Applications of crime seriousness information in police departments.”J. of Criminal Justice1: 241-253.
19.
Heller, N. B.
1977 “Applications of crime seriousness rating information in police departments,” in H. Herold et al., Offence Classification and Rating. Wiesbaden: Bundeskriminalamt.
20.
Herold, H.et al.
1977 Offence Classification and Rating. Wiesbaden: Bundeskriminalamt.
21.
Holmes, O. W.
1881 The Common Law. Boston: Little, Brown.
22.
Kugelmass, S.
, S. Breznitz, and T. Breznitz 1965 “The development of intentionality in moral judgment: suggestions and initial test,” in H. Hoffman (ed.) Scripts Hierosolymitana, Vol. XIV: Studies in Psychology. Jerusalem: Magnes Press.
23.
Lesieur, H. R.
, and P. M. Lehman1975“Remeasuring delinquency: a replication and critique.”British J. of Criminology15, 1: 69-80.
24.
McClintock, F. H.
1977 “Basic problems of offence classification and indexing,” in H. Herold et al., Offence Classification and Rating. Wiesbaden: Bundeskriminalant.
25.
Mueller, G.O.W.1955“Tort, crime and the primitive.”J. of Criminal Law & Criminology46: 303-332.
26.
Nettler, G.
1978 Explaining Crime. New York: McGraw-Hill.
27.
Newman, G. R.1974“Acts, actors and reactions to deviance.”Sociology & Social Research58, 4: 434-436.
28.
Normandeau, A.1970“Crime indices for eight countries.”Revue Internationale de Police Criminelle234: 15-18.
29.
Pease, K.
, J. Ireson, and J. Thorpe1974“Additivity assumptions in the measurements of delinquency.”British J. of Criminology14, 3: 256-263.
30.
Perks, W.
(chairman) 1967 Report of the Departmental Committee on Criminal Statistics. Cmnd. 3448. London: H.M.S.O.
31.
Piaget, J.
1932 The Moral Judgment of the Child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
32.
Rheinstein, M.
1954 Max Weber on Law in Economy and Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
33.
Riedel, M.1975“Perceived circumstances, inferences of intent and judgments of offense seriousness.”J. of Criminal Law & Criminology66, 2: 201-208.
34.
Rose, G.N.G.1966“Concerning the measurement of delinquency.”British J. of Criminology6, 4: 414-421.
35.
Rose, G.N.G.
1970 “The merits of an index of crime of the kind devised by Sellin and Wolfgang,” in The Index of Crime: Some Further Studies. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
36.
Roth, J. A.1978“Prosecutor perceptions of crime seriousness.”J. of Criminal Law & Criminology69, 2: 232-242.
37.
Schulhofer, S. J.1974“Harm and punishment: a critique of emphasis on the results of conduct in the criminal law.”Univ. of Pennsylvania Law Rev.122, 6: 1497-1607.
38.
Sebba, L.1980“Is mens rea a component of perceived offense seriousness?”J. of Criminal Law & Criminology2: 124-135.
39.
Sellin, T.1931“The basis of a crime index.”J. of Criminal Law, Criminology and Police Science22: 335-356.
40.
Sellin, T.
and M. E. Wolfgang 1964 The Measurement of Delinquency. New York: John Wiley.
41.
Sellin, T.
and M. E. Wolfgang 1969 “Measuring delinquency,” in T. Sellin and M. E. Wolfgang, Delinquency: Selected Studies. New York: John Wiley.
42.
Starrs, J. E.
1961 “The regulatory offense in historical perspective,” in G.O.W. Mueller (ed.) Essays in Criminal Science. South Hackensack, NJ: Fred B. Rothman.
43.
Tapp, J.
and L. Kohlberg1971“Developing senses of law and legal justice.”J. of Social Issues27, 2: 65-91.
44.
Tornudd, P.
1975 “Towards crime statistics based on damages,” in E. Aspelin et al., Some Developments in Nordic Criminal Policy and Criminology. Stockholm: Scandinavian Research Council for Criminology.
45.
Tornudd, P.
1977 “Crime statistics based on damage: experience and plans in Scandinavia,” in Herold et al., Offense Classification and Rating. Wiesbaden: Bundeskriminalant.
46.
Turner, S.
1978 “Introduction to the reprint edition,” in T. Sellin and M. E. Wolfgang, the Measurement of Delinquency. Montclair: Patterson Smith.
47.
Versele, S. C.
1972 “Legal aspects of the perception of deviance and criminality,” in Perception of Deviance and Criminality. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
48.
Walker, M. A.1978“Measuring the seriousness of crimes.”British J. of Criminology18, 4: 348-364.
49.
Walker, N.1971“Psychophysics and the recording angel.”British J. of Criminology11, 2: 191-194.
50.
Wellford, C. P.
and M. Wiatrowski1975“On the measurement of delinquency.”J. of Criminal Law & Criminology66, 2: 175-188.
51.
Wolfgang, M. E.1967“International criminal statistics: a proposal.”J. of Criminal Law & Criminology58, 1: 65-69.
52.
Wolfgang, M. E.
1976 “Seriousness of crime and a policy of juvenile justice,” in J. F. Short (ed.) Delinquency, Crime and Society. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
53.
Wolfgang, M. E.1979“Current trends in penal philosophy.”Israel Law Rev.14, 4: 427-443.
54.
Wolfgang, M. E.
, R. M. Figlio, and T. Sellin 1972 Delinquency in a Birth Cohort. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
55.
Wootton, B.
1959 Social Science and Social Pathology. London: Allen & Unwin.
56.
Wootton, B.
1963 Crime and the Criminal Law. London: Stevens.
