Analysis of self-report and official record data obtained from nearly 2200 male prison and jail inmates in California, Michigan, and Texas shows that offenders can be usefully classified according to the combinations of crimes they commit. The most serious inmates, those who concurrently commit robbery, assault, and drug dealing, disproportiontely commit these defining crimes at high rates. They often commit burglaries, thefts, and other crimes at high rates too—frequently at higher rates than other types of criminals, including those who specialize in those crimes. Unfortunately, information currently available from such sources as official arrest and conviction records do not permit criminal justice officials to distinguish meaningfully between these high-rate, serious offenders and other types. Low-rate offenders can be more accurately identified using potentially available information on key characteristics: multiple drug use, unstable employment, juvenile use of hard drugs, and violence before the age of 16.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Blumstein, A.
, J. Cohen, and D. Nagin (eds.) 1978 Deterrence and Incapacitation: Estimating the Effects of Criminal Sanctions on Crime Rates. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
2.
Center for Studies in Criminology and Criminal Law
1980 National Survey of Crime Severity: Final National Level Geometric Means and Ratio-Scores by Offense Stimuli Items. Philadelphia: Univ. of Pennsylvania.
3.
Chaiken, J. M.
and M. Chaiken 1982 Varieties of Criminal Behavior. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corp.
4.
Cohen, J.
1982 “Avoiding the pitfalls of prediction: the incapacitation potential of targeting on charged offense.” Presented at the American Society of the Criminology meetings, Toronto.
5.
Conrad, J. P.
1980 “Curing the American disease: the violent predator on the unsafe streets,” in E. Bittner and S. Messinger (eds.) Criminology Review Yearbook, Vol. 2. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
6.
Figlio, R. M.
1981 “Delinquency career as a simple Markov process,” in J. A. Fox (ed.) Models in Quantitative Criminology. New York: Academic Press.
7.
Gibbons, D. C.1975“Offender typologies—two decades later.”British J. of Criminology15, 2: 140-156.
8.
Glaser, D.
1972 Adult Crime and Social Policy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
9.
Goldstein, P. J.
1981 “Getting over: economic alternatives to predicting crime among street drug users,” in J. A. Inciardi (ed.) The Drugs-Crime Connection. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
10.
Goldstein, P. J.
1982 “Drugs and violent behavior.” Presented at the annual meetings of the Academy of Criminal Justice Science, Louisville, March.
11.
Greenwood, P. W.
(with A. Abrahamse) 1982 Selective Incapacitation. Report R-2815-NIJ. Santa Monica; CA: Rand Corp.
12.
Hoffman, P. B.
and J. L. Beck1980“Revalidating the salient factor score: a research note.”J. of Criminal Justice8: 185-188.
13.
Holland, T.
, M. Levi, and G. Beckett1981“Associations between violent and non-violent criminality: a canonical contingency-table analysis.”Multivariate Behavioral Research16: 237-242.
14.
Hood, R.
and R. Sparks 1970 Key Issues in Criminology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
15.
Johnson, B. D.
1981 “The drug-crime nexus (1979-1981): Research on the drug crime relationship, with emphasis upon heroin users/injectors as criminal recidivists.” Prepared for the National Institute of Justice, December.
16.
Kvalseth, T.1980“Seriousness of offenses.”Criminology18, 2: 237-244.
17.
Marquis, K.
(with P. Ebener) 1981 Quality of Prisoner Self-Reports: Arrests and Conviction Response Errors. Report R-2637-DOJ. Santa Monica; CA: Rand Corp.
18.
New York State Supreme Court
. 1977 “Principles and recommendations for diversion,” in S. L. Radzinowicz and M. E. Wolfgang (eds.) Crime and Justice, Vol. II: The Criminal in the Arms of the Law. New York: Basic Books.
19.
Petersilia, J.
and P. Greenwood (with M. Lavin) 1978“Mandatory prison sentences: their projected effects on crime and prison populations.”J. of Criminal Law and Criminology69: 604-615.
20.
Petersilia, J.
, P. W. Greenwood, and M. Lavin 1977 Criminal Careers of Habitual Felons. Report R-2144-DOJ. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corp.
21.
Peterson, M. A.
and H. Braiker (with S. M. Polich) 1981 Who Commits Crime: A Survey of Prison Inmates. Cambridge, MA: Oelgeschlager, Gunn & Hain.
22.
Peterson, M.
, J. Chaiken, P. Ebener, and P. Honig 1982 Survey of Prison and Jail Inmates: Background and Method. Report N-1635-NIJ. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corp.
23.
Pritchard, D. A.1979“Stable predictors of recidivism.”Criminology17, 1: 15-21.
24.
Reiss, A., Jr.
1980 “Understanding changes in crime rates,” in S. Fienberg and A. Reiss, Jr., (eds.) Indicators of Crime and Criminal Justice: Quantitative Studies. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
25.
Robbins, L. N.
and E. Wish (1977) 1977 “Childhood deviance as a developmental process: a study of 223 urban black men from birth to 18.”Social Forces56, 2: 448-471.
26.
Sellin, T.
and M. E. Wolfgang 1964 The Measurement of Delinquency. New York: John Wiley.
27.
Van Dine, S.
, J. P. Conrad, and S. Dinitz 1979 Restraining the Wicked: The Incapacitation of the Dangerous Criminal. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.
28.
Von Hirsch, A.
1976 Doing Justice. New York: Hill & Wang.
29.
Vorenberg, E. W.
and J. Vorenberg 1973 “Early diversion from the criminal justice system: practice in search of a theory.” in L. E. Ohlin (Ed.) Prisoners in America. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
30.
Wish, E.
1982 “Urine Testing of Arrestees: A Tool for Reducing Drug Abuse and Crime.” Presented at the annual meetings of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, August.
31.
Wolfgang, M.
, R. M. Figlio, and T. Sellin 1972 Delinquency in a Birth Cohort. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
