Abstract
The opening section of this article discusses the need for more explicit definition of elements governing parole selection and the problem of determining the weight that should be given to each. The study then demonstrates a method by which analysis of parole board decisions may make present paroling policy more explicit. Decision guidelines developed from this method provide an aid in actual case decision-making. By structuring discretion without re moving it, these guidelines permit it to be exercised fairly and ra tionally. A United States Board of Parole pilot project which in cludes guideline usage and a procedure for regular evaluation and modification of guidelines is then described.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
