Research has consistently revealed a link between involvement in adolescent delinquency and adult criminal behavior. Even so, there remains much that is unknown about this association, including the potential mechanisms that might explain it. The current study sought to add to this literature by examining the connection between being arrested as a juvenile and future self-reported involvement in adult criminal behavior. To do so, we analyzed data drawn from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health). We employed propensity score matching analysis to examine whether participants who were arrested as juveniles had significantly different mean scores on measures of crime (violent, nonviolent, and total) at two different points in adulthood when compared to matched controls. The results of these analyses revealed that participants who had been arrested as a juvenile self-reported greater involvement on four of the six crime measures compared to matched controls although these mean differences were attenuated once participants were matched on key covariates, including adolescent delinquency, low self-control, delinquent peers, and neuropsychological functioning, among others. We discuss the interpretation of these results and draw attention to the role that labeling may play in accounting for the link between juvenile arrests and adult criminal involvement.
AluaM.AkynkozhaZ.AizhanA.YermekN.TurgumbayevY.BeaverK. M. (2024). What separates offenders who are not victimized from offenders who are victimized? Results from a nationally representative sample of males and females. Victims & Offenders, 19(4), 513–530. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2023.2263849
2.
BarnesJ. C. (2014). Catching the really bad guys: An assessment of the efficacy of the U.S. criminal justice system. Journal of Criminal Justice, 42(4), 338–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2014.04.002
3.
BeaverK. M.RatchfordM.FergusonC. J. (2009). Evidence of genetic and environmental effects on the development of self-control. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 1148–1162.
4.
BeaverK. M.VaughnM. G.DeLisiM.BarnesJ. C.BoutwellB. B. (2011). The neuropsychological underpinnings to psychopathic personality traits in a nationally representative and longitudinal sample. Psychiatric Quarterly, 83(2), 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-011-9190-2
5.
BekbolatkyzyD. S.YerenatovnaD. R.MaratulyY. A.MakhatovnaA. G.BeaverK. M. (2019). Aging out of adolescent delinquency: Results from a longitudinal sample of youth and young adults. Journal of Criminal Justice, 60, 108–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2018.09.001
6.
BellairP. E.RoscignoV. J.McnultyT. L. (2003). Linking local labor market opportunity to violent adolescent delinquency. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 40(1), 6–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427802239252
7.
BensonM. L. (2013). Crime and the life course: An introduction (2nd edition). Routledge.
8.
CairnsR. B.CairnsB. D. (1994). Lifelines and risks: Pathways of youth in our time. Cambridge University Press.
9.
ChiricosT.BarrickK.BalesW.BontragerS. (2007). The labeling of convicted felons and its consequences for recidivism. Criminology, 45(3), 547–581. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2007.00089.x
10.
CoyneM. A.WrightJ. P. (2014). The stability of self-control across childhood. Personality and Individual Differences, 69, 144–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.05.026
11.
CullenF. T. (2013). Rehabilitation: Beyond nothing works. Crime and Justice, 42(1), 299–376. https://doi.org/10.1086/670395
12.
D'AmatoR. C.GrayJ. W.DeanR. S. (1988). Construct validity of the PPVT with neuropsychological, intellectual, and achievement measures. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44(6), 934–939.
13.
DeLisiM. (2005). Career criminals in society. Sage.
DianaK.YerlanT.RimaD.MeruertB.GulnazA.BeaverK. M. (2023). Parental criminality as an extralegal biasing factor in being processed through the criminal justice system. Journal of Criminal Justice, 86, Article 102066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2023.102066
16.
DunnL. M.DunnL. M. (1981). Peabody picture vocabulary test-revised. American Guidance Service.
17.
GottfredsonM. R.HirschiT. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford University Press.
18.
GuoS.FraserM. W. (2010). Propensity score analysis: Statistical methods and applications. Sage.
19.
HarrisK. M.FloreyF.TaborJ.BearmanP. S.JonesJ.UdryR. J. (2003). The National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health: Research design [www document]. http://www.cpc.unc.edu/projects/addhealth/design
20.
HaynieD. L.PiqueroA. R. (2006). Pubertal development and physical victimization in adolescence. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 43(1), 3–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427805280069
LemerE. (1972). Human deviance, social problems, and social control (2nd ed.). Prentice-Hall.
23.
LemertE. (1951). Social pathology. McGraw-Hill.
24.
LibermanA. M.KirkD. S.KimK. (2014). Labeling effects of first juvenile arrests: Secondary deviance and secondary sanctioning. Criminology, 52(3), 345–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12039
25.
MammadovR.RimaD.SharipovaA.BissenovaM.BeaverK. M. (2021). Immigration and victimization in adolescence and adulthood: Findings from a nationally representative sample. Victims & Offenders, 16(5), 708–722. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2020.1835765
26.
MillerJ. G. (1991). Last one over the wall: The Massachusetts experiment in closing reform schools. Ohio State University Press.
27.
MoffittT. E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy.Psychological Review, 100(4), 674–701. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295x.100.4.674
28.
NaginD. S.PaternosterR. (2000). Population heterogeneity and state dependence: State of the evidence and directions for future research. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 16, 117–144.
29.
PrattT. C.CullenF. T. (2000). The empirical status of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime: A meta-analysis. Criminology, 38, 931–964.
30.
RosenbaumP. R. (2005). Observational study. In EverittB. S.HowellD. C. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science (pp. 1451–1462). Wiley.
ThornberryT. P.KrohnM. D. (2000). The self-report method for measuring delinquency and crime. In Measurement and analysis of crime and justice (pp. 33–83). National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.
36.
TracyP. E.WolfgangM. E.FiglioR. M. (1990). Delinquency careers in two birth cohorts. Plenum.
37.
TravisL. F.CullenF. T. (1984). Radical non-intervention: The myth of doing no harm. Federal Probation, 48, 29–32.
UdryJ. R. (2003). The national longitudinal study of adolescent health (Add Health), waves I and II, 1994–1996, wave III, 2001–2002 [Machine-readable data file and documentation]. Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill.
40.
VazsonyiA. T.MikuŝkaJ.KelleyE. L. (2017). It’s time: A meta-analysis on the self- control-deviance link. Journal of Criminal Justice, 48, 48–63.
41.
WilsonJ. Q.HerrnsteinR. (1985). Crime and human nature: The definitive study of the causes of crime. Simon and Schuster.
42.
WrightJ. P.BeaverK. M.GibsonC. L. (2010). Behavioral stability as an emergent process: Toward a coherence theory of concentrated personal disadvantage. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39(9), 1080–1096. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-010-9528-3
43.
WrightJ. P.TibbettsS. G.DaigleL. E. (2015). Criminals in the making: Criminality across the life course (2nd ed.). Sage.
