Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Police-based diversion programs offer a promising approach to preventing criminal offending, improving the health of individuals with substance use disorder, and reducing the costs of substance use. While some research has assessed program implementation, less has explored what circumstances impact low implementation or sustainability. The current case study addresses this gap by exploring circumstances surrounding low implementation of a police-based diversion initiative. Results suggest that the program reached its intended population but was underutilized. Qualitative interviews with key stakeholders identify facilitators (e.g., collaboration) and barriers (e.g., staff turnover) to program implementation and sustainability. Results are discussed in the context of implementing police-based diversion programs, offering practical implications for those developing or evaluating police-based diversion initiatives.

Keywords

police diversion case study program sustainability substance use

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Albright

Navarro

E. I.

Jarad

Boyd

M. R.

Powell

B. J.

Lewis

C. C.

(2022). Communication strategies to facilitate the implementation of new clinical practices: A qualitative study of community mental health therapists. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 12(2), 324–334.

Allen

J. D.

Shrestha

Nguyen

K. H.

Stopka

T. J.

Cuevas

Corlin

(2022). Medical mistrust, discrimination, and COVID-19 vaccine behaviors among a national sample US adults. SSM-Population Health, 20, Article 101278.

Bastomski

Cramer

Reimal

(2019). Evaluation of the contra costa county law enforcement assisted diversion plus program: Interim evaluation report. http://www.bscc.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/Contra-Costa-County-Health-Services-Department-1.pdf

Bauer

M. S.

Damschroder

Hagedorn

Smith

Kilbourne

A. M.

(2015). An introduction to implementation science for the non-specialist. BMC Psychology, 3, 1–12.

Beckett

(2014). Seattle’s Law Enforcement Assisted Diversion program: Lessons learned from the first two years. University of Washington. https://www.fordfound.org/media/2543/2014-lead-process-evaluation.pdf

Blais

Brisson

Gagnon

Lemay

S. A.

(2022). Diverting people who use drugs from the criminal justice system: A systematic review of police-based diversion measures. International Journal of Drug Policy, 105, Article 103697.

Bouckenooghe

(2010). Positioning change recipients’ attitudes toward change in the organizational change literature. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 46(4), 500–531.

Braun

Clarke

(2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352.

Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2024). Law enforcement agency reported crime analysis tool. https://learcat.bjs.ojp.gov/IncidentsCrime?Data%20Year=2022&Unit%20of%20Analysis=Count&Offense%20Category=Drug%2FNarcotic%20Offenses

10.

Chandler

R. K.

Flecther

B. W.

Volkow

N. D.

(2009). Treating drug abuse and addiction in the criminal justice system: Improving public health and safety. Journal of the American Medical Association, 301(10), 183–190.

11.

City of Detroit. (n.d.) Public safety data [Data set]. City of Detroit Open Data Portal. https://data.detroitmi.gov/search?tags=public%2520safety

12.

Collins

S. E.

Lonczak

H. S.

Clifasefi

S. L.

(2017). Seattle’s Law Enforcement Assisted Diversion (LEAD): Program effects on recidivism outcomes. Evaluation and Program Planning, 64, 49–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.05.008

13.

De Biasi

Krupa

J. M.

Rzotkiewicz

McGarrell

Circo

Liebler

(2023). Insights from law enforcement personnel during the COVID-19 pandemic: A focus on violence reduction and prevention initiatives and firearm violence. Police Practice Research: An International Journal, 24(3), 322–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/15614263.2022.2112193

14.

Dennison

C. R.

Finkeldey

J. G.

(2021). Self-reported experiences and consequences of unfair treatment by police. Criminology, 59(2), 254–290.

15.

Detroit-Wayne CIT. (n.d.). Retrieved June 20, 2024, from https://www.detroitwaynecit.org/

16.

Esbensen

F. A.

Matsuda

K. N.

Taylor

T. J.

Peterson

(2011). Multimethod strategy for assessing program fidelity: The national evaluation of the revised G.R.E.A.T. program. Evaluation Review, 35(1), 14–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X10388126

17.

Fedders

(2019). Opioid policing. Indiana Law Journal, 94(2), 389–450.

18.

Gilbert

A. R.

Siegel

Easter

M. M.

Sivaraman

J. C.

Hofer

Ariturk

Swartz

M. S.

Swanson

J. W.

(2023). Law Enforcement Assisted Diversion (LEAD): A multi-site evaluation of North Carolina LEAD programs. Duke University School of Medicine.

19.

Gralapp

Willingham

Pruitt

Barile

J. P.

(2019). Law enforcement assisted diversion Honolulu 1-year program evaluation report. University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa.

20.

International Association of Chiefs of Police and University of Cincinnati Center for Police Research and Policy. (2021). Assessing the impact of law enforcement assisted diversion (LEAD): A review of research. https://www.theiacp.org/sites/default/files/IDD/Review%20of%20LEAD%20Evaluations.pdf

21.

Joudrey

P. J.

Nelson

C. R.

Lawson

Morford

K. L.

Muley

Watson

Okafor

Wang

E. A.

Crusto

(2021). Law enforcement assisted diversion: Qualitative evaluation of barriers and facilitators of program implementation. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 129, Article 108476.

22.

Krupa

J. M.

Manz

M. T

. (2024). Detroit law enforcement assisted diversion (LEAD): Final evaluation report. School of Criminal Justice, Michigan State University.

23.

LEAD Support Bureau. (2022). Detroit LEAD fidelity of implementation summary.

24.

LEAD Support Bureau. (2023a). LEAD sites. LEAD Bureau. Retrieved June 20, 2024, from https://leadbureau.org/lead-sites/

25.

LEAD Support Bureau. (2023b). Resources: Tools for LEAD. https://leadbureau.org/toolkit/resources/designing-effective-initiatives-the-lead-fidelity-framework/

26.

Lipsky

(1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. Russell Sage.

27.

Lundmark

Hasson

Richter

Khachatryan

Åkesson

Eriksson

(2021). Alignment in implementation of evidence-based interventions: A scoping review. Implementation Science, 16, 1–14.

28.

Malm

Perrone

Magaña

E. J.

(2020). Law Enforcement Assisted Diversion (LEAD) external evaluation. Report to the California State Legislature. http://www.eskom.co.za/CustomerCare/TariffsAndCharges/Documents/RSADistributionTariffCodeVers6.pdf%0Ahttp://www.nersa.org

29.

Magaña

E. J.

Perrone

Malm

(2022). A process evaluation of San Francisco’s law Enforcement Assisted Diversion program. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 33(2), 148–176.

30.

Merrall

E. L.

Kariminia

Binswanger

I. A.

Hobbs

M. S.

Farrell

Marsden

Hutchinson

S. J.

Bird

S. M.

(2010). Meta-analysis of drug-related deaths soon after release from prison. Addiction, 105(9), 1545–1554.

31.

New Mexico Sentencing Commission. (2018). Santa Fe Law Enforcement Assisted Diversion (LEAD): An analysis of pilot phase outcomes. http://nmsc.unm.edu/reports/index.html

32.

Nyland

J. E.

Zhang

Balles

J. A.

Nguyen

T. H.

White

Albert

L. A.

Henningfield

M. F.

Zgierska

A. E.

(2024). Law enforcement-led, pre-arrest diversion-to-treatment may reduce crime recidivism, incarceration, and overdose deaths: Program evaluation outcomes. Journal of Substance Use and Addiction Treatment, 165, Article 209458.

33.

Perrone

Malm

Magaña

E. J.

(2022). Harm reduction policing: An evaluation of Law Enforcement Assisted Diversion (LEAD) in San Francisco. Police Quarterly, 25(1), 7–32.

34.

Roberts

Dowell

Nie

J. B.

(2019). Attempting rigour and replicability in thematic analysis of qualitative research data; a case study of codebook development. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 19(1), 1–8.

35.

Rogers

(2005). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). The Free Press.

36.

Rosenberg

Heimer

Keene

D. E.

Groves

A. K.

Blankenship

K. M.

(2019). Drug treatment accessed through the criminal justice system: Participants’ perspectives and uses. Journal of Urban Health, 96(3), 390–399.

37.

Rouhani

Gudlavalleti

Atzmon

Park

J. N.

Olson

S. P.

Sherman

S. G.

(2019). Police attitudes towards pre-booking diversion in Baltimore, Maryland. The International Journal on Drug Policy, 65, 78–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.11.012

38.

Scaccia

J. P.

Cook

B. S.

Lamont

Wandersman

Castellow

Katz

Beidas

R. S.

(2015). A practical implementation science heuristic for organizational readiness: R= MC2. Journal of Community Psychology, 43(4), 484–501.

39.

Schaible

Gant

Ames

(2021). The impact of police attitudes towards offenders on law-enforcement assisted diversion decisions. Police Quarterly, 24(2), 205–232.

40.

Schiff

D. M.

Drainoni

M.-L.

Weinstein

Z. M.

Chan

Bair-Merritt

Rosenbloom

(2017). A police-led addiction treatment referral program in Gloucester, MA: Implementation and participants’ experiences. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 82, 41–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2017.09.003

41.

U.S. Census Bureau. (2022). American community survey 1-year estimates. https://data.census.gov/profile/Detroit_city,_Michigan?g=160XX00US2622000

42.

Vincent

G. M.

(2021). Introduction to this Special Issue on implementing evidence-based practices in forensic settings. Behavioral Sciences & Law, 39(1), 1–5.

43.

Worden

R. E.

McLean

S. J.

(2018). Discretion and diversion in Albany’s LEAD program. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 29(6–7), 584–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403417723960

44.

Yin

R. K.

(2018). Case study research and applications (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

45.

Zhang

Balles

J. A.

Henningfield

M. F.

Nyland

J. E.

Nguyen

T. H.

Zgierska

A. E.

(2024). Offering recovery rather than punishment: Implementation of a law enforcement–led pre-arrest diversion-to-treatment program for adults with substance use disorders. Journal of Substance Use and Addiction Treatment, 159, Article 209274.

46.

Zgierska

A. E.

White

V. M.

Balles

Nelson

Freedman

Nguyen

T. H.

Johnson

S. C.

(2021). Pre-arrest diversion to addiction treatment by law enforcement: Protocol for the community-level policing initiative to reduce addiction-related harm, including crime. Health & Justice, 9(1), 1–9.

“If We Could Identify Those Roadblocks,The Program Could Run Way Better”: A Case Study Exploring Circumstances of Low Implementation in an Arrest Diversion Program

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References