In the current study, we examine the impact that perceptions of legitimacy of laws and authority have on the institutional misconduct behavior of a large cohort of serious and violent incarcerated youth. Negative binomial analyses examining the official misconduct of more than 4,000 incarcerated youth during their entire term of incarceration indicated that youth with higher legitimacy perceptions (as measured by the R-PACT) incurred a significantly lower number of total misconduct incidents than those with lower legitimacy perceptions, net the effects of controls typically associated with institutional misconduct perpetration. Youth with higher legitimacy perceptions also perpetrated a significantly lower number of violent misconduct incidents than those with lower legitimacy perceptions, net other controls. Research and policy implications are discussed.
AlwardL. (2024). Procedural justice and probation officer legitimacy: Testing the process-based model in community supervision. Journal of Criminal Justice, 92, Article 102187.
2.
AlwardL.BakerT.GordonJ. (2021). Procedural justice and incarcerated people’s obligation to obey institutional rules: An examination of current, former, and never-gang members. Journal of Criminal Justice, 73, Article 10157.
3.
AndersonE. (2000). Code of the street: Decency, violence, and the moral life of the inner city. W. W. Norton & Company.
4.
BaglivioM. T.EppsN.SwartzK.HuqM. S.SheerA.HardtN. S. (2014). The prevalence of adverse childhood experiences (ACE) in the lives of juvenile offenders. Journal of Juvenile Justice, 3(2), 1–17.
5.
BeijersbergenK. A.DirkzwagerA. J. E.NieuwbeertaP. (2015). Reoffending after release: Does procedural justice during imprisonment matter?Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43, 63–82.
6.
BergM. T.DeLisiM. (2006). The correctional melting pot: Race, ethnicity, citizenship, and prison violence. Journal of Criminal Justice, 34(6), 631–642.
7.
BolgerP. C.WaltersG. D. (2019). The relationship between police procedural justice, police legitimacy, and people’s willingness to cooperate with law enforcement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Criminal Justice, 60, 93–99.
8.
BragaA. A.WeisburdD. L. (2012). The effects of focused deterrence strategies on crime: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the empirical evidence. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 49, 323–358.
9.
CampbellC.LabrecqueR.SchaeferR.HarvisM.ZavitaK.ReddyL.LabrancheK. (2020). Do perceptions of legitimacy and fairness matter in prison?Criminal Justice and Behavior, 47, 1630–1653.
FaganJ.PiqueroA. R. (2007). Rational choice and developmental influences on recidivism among adolescent felony offenders. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 4, 715–748.
12.
FineA.FountainE.VidalS. (2019). Juveniles’ beliefs about and perceptions of probation predict technical violations and delinquency. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 25(2), 116–125.
13.
HawkenA.KleimanM. A. R. (2009). Managing drug involved probationers with swift and certain sanctions: Evaluating Hawaii’s HOPE (Final report). National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice.
14.
HayC.MeldrumR.HensonB.HanleyD. (2018). Risk assessment and juvenile recidivism: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 45(2), 234–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854817739925
15.
KolivoskiK.ShookJ.JohnsonH.GoodkindSFuscoR.DeLisiM.VaughnM. (2016). Applying legal socialization to the child welfare system: Do youths’ perceptions of caseworkers matter?Child Youth Care Forum, 45, 65–83.
16.
LongS. L.FreeseJ. (2006). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata. StataCorp LP.
17.
McLeanK.WolfeS.PrattT. (2019). Legitimacy and the life course: An age-graded examination of changes in legitimacy attitudes over time. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 56(1), 42–83.
18.
MikytuckA.WoolardJ. L.UmpierreM. (2019). Improving engagement, empowerment, and support in juvenile corrections through research. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 5, 182–192.
19.
MonahanK. C.GoldweberA.CauffmanE. (2011). The effects of visitation on incarcerated juvenile offenders: How contact with the outside impacts adjustment on the Inside. Law & Human Behavior, 35, 143–151.
20.
MurphyK.CherneyA. (2011). Fostering cooperation with the police: How do ethnic minorities in Australia respond to procedural justice-based policing?Journal of Criminology, 44(2), 235–257.
21.
PaternosterR.BrameR.BackmanR.ShermanL. (1997). Do fair procedures matter? The effect of procedural justice on spouse assault. Law & Society Review, 31, 163–204.
22.
PennerE. K.ViljoenJ. L.DouglasK. S.RoeschR. (2014). Procedural justice versus risk factors for offending: Predicting recidivism in youth. Law and Human Behavior, 38, 225–237.
TisakM.GoldsteinS. (2023). Criminality, cognitive distortions, empathy, and legitimacy of laws: Behaviors and perspectives of youth offenders. Current Psychology, 42, 7049–7059.
TrulsonC. R. (2007). Determinants of disruption: Institutional misconduct among state-committed delinquents. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 5(1), 7–34.
27.
TrulsonC. R.CraigJ.CaudillJ.DelisiM. (2022). Violent institutional misconduct in the transition from juvenile to adult correctional facilities. The Prison Journal, 102(5), 519–541.
TrulsonC. R.DeLisiM.MarquartJ. (2011). Institutional misconduct, delinquent background, and rearrest frequency among serious and violent delinquent offenders. Crime & Delinquency, 57(5), 709–731.
30.
TrulsonC. R.HaerleD. R.CaudillJ. W.DeLisiM. (2016). Lost causes: Blended sentencing, second chances, and the Texas youth commission. University of Texas Press.
31.
TylerT. R. (1990). Why people obey the law. Yale University Press.
32.
TylerT. R. (1997). The psychology of legitimacy: A relational perspective on voluntary deference to authorities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 323–345.
33.
van HallM.DirkzwagerA.van der LannP.NieuwbeertaP. (2023). Procedural justice, perceived legitimacy, and reoffending behavior in police and court setting. Criminal Justice & Behavior, 50(12), 1874–1892.
34.
WallaceD. M.PapachristosA. V.MearesT.FaganJ. (2016). Desistance and legitimacy: The impact of offender notification meetings on recidivism among high risk offenders. Justice Quarterly, 33, 1237–1264.
35.
WaltersG. D. (2017). Procedural justice, legitimacy beliefs, and moral disengagement in emerging adulthood: Explaining continuity and desistance in the moral model of criminal lifestyle development. Law and Human Behavior, 42(1), 37–49.
36.
WaltersG. D.BolgerP. C. (2019). Procedural justice perceptions, legitimacy beliefs, and compliance with the law: A meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 15, 341–372.
37.
ZhaoJ.WangX.ZhangH. (2020). The role of perceived legitimacy and its effect on prison adaption: A longitudinal study on a Chinese juvenile prison. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 64, 100–123.
