Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025
Do Moral Agency for Aggressive Behavior and Low Peer Substance Use Protect Against Non-Substance Use Delinquency? A Cross-Lagged Analysis of Youth at High Risk for Delinquency
This study was designed to determine whether a reciprocal relationship exists between moral agency for aggressive behavior and low peer substance use in their effect on future non-substance use delinquency. Employing a sample of 850 youth (425 boys and 425 girls) from the Flint Adolescent Sample (FAS), high moral agency for aggressive behavior was cross-lagged with low peer substance use and the two crossed paths were then correlated with later delinquency. Results revealed that improved moral agency predicted decreased peer substance use, which then predicted a decrease in delinquency. The other cross-lag indirect effect was also significant, with lower peer substance use predicting improved moral agency, which, in turn, predicted decreased delinquency. The direct effects, by contrast, were nonsignificant.
AazamiA.ValekR.PonceA. N.ZareH. (2023). Risk and protective factors and interventions for reducing juvenile delinquency: A systematic review. Social Sciences, 12(9), 474. https://doi.org10.3390/socsci12090474
2.
AllisonP. D. (2002). Missing data. Sage.
3.
BanduraA.BarbaranelliC.CpraraG. V.PastorelliC. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(3), 364–374.
4.
BaoZ.ZhangW.LaiX.SunW.WangY. (2015). Parental attachment and Chinese adolescents’ delinquency: The mediating role of moral disengagement. Journal of Adolescence, 44, 37–47.
5.
BeelmannA.ArnoldL. S.HercherJ. (2023). Parent training programs for preventing and treating antisocial behavior in children and adolescents: A comprehensive meta-analysis of international studies. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 68, Article 101790.
6.
BarrigaA. Q.GibbsJ. C. (1996). Measuring cognitive distortion in antisocial youth: Development and preliminary validation of the “How I Think” questionnaire. Aggressive Behavior, 22(5), 333–343.
7.
BontaJ.AndrewsD. (2017). The psychology of criminal conduct (6th ed.). Routledge.
8.
Concha-SalgadoA.RamirezA.PérezB.Pérez-LucoR. (2022). Moral disengagement as a self-regulatory cognitive process of transgressions: Psychometric evidence of the Bandura scale in Chilean adolescents. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19, 12249.
9.
CowellJ. M.DecetyJ. (2015). Precursors to morality in development as a complex interplay between neural, socioenvironmental, and behavioral facets. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 112(41), 12657–12662.
10.
CsizmadiaA.BrunsmaD. L.CooneyT. M. (2012). Racial identification and developmental outcomes among black-white multiracial youth: A review from a life course perspective. Advances in Life Course Research, 17(1), 34–44.
11.
DhalS. S.MohantyN.MohakudN. K.PanigrahiA.SahooM. (2023). Overt and covert delinquency: Socio-demographic correlates in justice-involved adolescent males. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 67(12), 1272–1281.
12.
ElwertF.WinshipC. (2014). Endogenous selection bias: The problem of conditioning on a collider variable. Annual Review of Sociology, 40(1), 31–53.
13.
FarringtonD. P. (2000). Explaining and preventing crime: The globalization of knowledge: The American Society of Criminology 1999 presidential address. Criminology, 38(1), 1–24.
14.
FarringtonD. P.TtofiM. M.PiqueroA. R. (2016). Risk, promotive, and protective factors in youth offending. Results from the Cambridge study in delinquent development. Journal of Criminal Justice, 45, 63–70.
15.
GottfredsonD. C.GerstenblithS. A.SouléD. A.WomerS. C.LuS. (2004). Do after school programs reduce delinquency?Prevention Science, 5(4), 253–266.
16.
HuizingaD. (1991). Assessing violent behavior with self-reports. In MilnerJ. S. (Ed.), Neuropsychology of aggression (pp. 44–76). Kluwer Academic.
17.
IBM Corporation. (2019). IBM SPSS statistics for Windows, Version 26.0.
18.
IshoyG. A. (2017). Exploring morality as a mediator of the association between parenting practices and violent and property offending among a sample of juvenile delinquents. Crime and Delinquency, 63(2), 113–136.
LodewijksH. P. B.de RuiterC.DoreleijersT. A. H. (2010), The impact of protective factors in desistance from violent reoffending: A study in three samples of adolescent offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25(3), 568–587.
21.
LoeberR.FarringtonD. P. (Eds.), (2001). Child delinquents: Development, intervention, and service needs. Sage.
22.
MarunaS.CopesH. (2005). What have we learned from five decades of neutralization research?Crime and Justice, 32, 221–320.
23.
MulveyE. P.SchubertC. A.ChassinL. (2010, December). Substance use and delinquent behavior among serious adolescent offenders.Juvenile Justice Bulletin, U.S. Deparatment of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
24.
MunirA.MalikJ. A. (2020). Mediating role of religious orientation and moral character for the relationship between parent and peer attachment and delinquency. Cogent Psychology, 7, Article 1761042.
25.
MuthénB.MuthénL. (1998–2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Muthén and Muthén.
26.
RibeaudD.EisnerM. (2010). Are moral disengagement, neutralization techniques, and self-serving cognitive distortions the same? Developing a unified scale of moral neutralization of aggression. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 4(2), 298–315.
27.
ShadishW. R.CookT. D.CampbellD. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Mifflin.
28.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2017). Key substance use and mental health indicators in the United States: Results from the 2016 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (HHS Publication No. SMA 17-5044, NSDUH Series H-52). Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.
29.
SykesG. M.MatzaD. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 22(6), 664–670.
30.
Tanner-SmithE. E.WilsonS. J.LipseyM. W. (2012). Risk factors and crime. In CullenF. T.WilcoxP. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of criminological theory (pp. 89–112). Oxford University Press.
31.
TaylorA. (2003). Animals & ethics: An overview of the philosophical debate. Broadview Press.
32.
ValaviP.HarouniN. S.MoghadamM. S. (2022). The lived experience of parents from educating morality to their children Phenomenological study. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 11, 354.
33.
Vanderbilt-AdrianceE.ShawD. (2008). Protective factors and the development of resilience in the context of neighborhood disadvantage. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology36(6), 887–901.
34.
WaltersG. D. (2022). Crime and social cognition: A meta-analytic review of the developmental roots of adult criminal thinking. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 18(1), 183–207.
35.
WaltersG. D. (2023a). Counseling services leading to desistance by way of a change in certainty perceptions and cognitive agency beliefs. Law and Human Behavior, 47(3), 436–447.
36.
WaltersG. D. (2023b). Individual differences in school conduct, friend delinquency, and moral agency as predictors of recidivism in low-to-moderate-risk youth. Personality and Individual Differences, 215, Article 112374.
37.
WaltersG. D. (2023c). The role of development in the dynamic relationship between moral agency and peer delinquency. Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology, 9(3), 483–506.
38.
WaltersG. D. (2024). Predicting future recidivism from changes in school grades and moral agency. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 51(4), 491–509.
39.
WassermanG. A.KeenanK.TremblayR. E.CoieJ. D.HerrenkohlT. J.LoeberR.PetechukD. (2003, April). Child delinquency: Risk and protective factors of child delinquency. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
40.
WrightR.JohnL.DukuE.BurgosG.KrygsmanA.EspostoC. (2009). After-school programs as a prosocial setting for bonding between peers. Child & Youth Services, 31(3-4), 74–91.
41.
YoungJ. T. N.RebellonC. J.BarnesJ. C.WeermanF. M. (2013). Unpacking the black box of peer similarity in deviance: Understanding the mechanisms linking personal behavior, peer behavior, and perceptions. Criminology, 52(1), 60–86.
42.
YuH.SiegelJ. Z.ClitheroJ. A.CrockettM. J. (2023). How peer influence shapes value computation in moral decision-making. Cognition, Article 104641.
43.
ZimmermanM. (2014). Flint [Michigan] adolescent study (FAS): A longitudinal study of school dropout and substance use, 1994-1997 (ICPSR34598-v1). Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor].
