This study assesses public opinion on how attempted mass shooters should be handled by the criminal justice system. Multinomial logistic regression determined the relative roles of age and mental health status in predicting the endorsement of punishment, treatment, or balanced approaches that incorporate both punitive and therapeutic treatment. Findings suggest that the endorsement of rehabilitative or balanced approaches depends heavily on perceptions of the likely effectiveness of treatment programs and offenders’ deservedness of access to treatment. Specifically, support for balanced approaches to processing attempted mass shooters extends across age and mental health status for people who believe in the effectiveness of treatment. To a lesser extent, the same pattern exists for people who believe offenders deserve treatment in general.
AbelM. N.ChermakS.FreilichJ. D. (2022). Pre-attack warning behaviors of 20 adolescent school shooters: A case study analysis. Crime & Delinquency, 68(5), 786–813.
2.
ApplegateB. K.CullenF. T.FisherB. S.VenT. V. (2000). Forgiveness and fundamentalism: Reconsidering the relationship between correctional attitudes and religion. Criminology, 38(3), 719–754.
3.
ApplegateB. K.DavisR. K.CullenF. T. (2009). Reconsidering child saving: The extent and correlates of public support for excluding youths from the juvenile court. Crime & Delinquency, 55(1), 51–77.
4.
Atkin-PlunkC. A. (2020). Should all violent offenders be treated equally? Perceptions of punishment and rehabilitation for violent offenders with varying attributes. Victims & Offenders, 15(2), 218–242.
5.
Atkin-PlunkC. A.SloasL. B. (2019). Support for balanced justice and rehabilitation for justice-involved veterans. Criminal Justice Review, 44(2), 165–182.
6.
BachmanR. D.PaternosterR. (2016). Statistics for criminology and criminal justice. Sage Publications.
7.
BazemoreG. (1997). What's “new” about the balanced approach?Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 48(1), 1–22.
8.
BurtonA. L.CullenF. T.BurtonJrV. S.GrahamA.ButlerL. C.ThieloA. J. (2020). Belief in redeemability and punitive public opinion: “Once a criminal, always a criminal” revisited. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 47(6), 712–732.
9.
BurtonA. L.CullenF. T.PickettJ. T.BurtonJrV. S.ThieloA. J. (2021). Beyond the eternal criminal record: Public support for expungement. Criminology & Public Policy, 20(1), 123–151.
10.
ChangL.KrosnickJ. A. (2010). Comparing oral interviewing with self-administered computerized questionnaires: An experiment. Public Opinion Quarterly, 74(1), 154–167.
11.
ClearT. R. (2021). Decarceration problems and prospects. Annual Review of Criminology, 4(1), 239–260.
12.
CoppockA.McClellanO. A. (2019). Validating the demographic, political, psychological, and experimental results obtained from a new source of online survey respondents. Research & Politics, 6(1), 2053168018822174.
13.
CullenF. T.FisherB. S.ApplegateB. K. (2000). Public opinion about punishment and corrections. Crime and Justice, 27, 1–79.
14.
DrakulichK.DenverM. (2022). The partisans and the persuadables: Public views of Black lives matter and the 2020 protests. Perspectives on Politics, 20(4), 1191–1208.
15.
DuweG. (2020). Patterns and prevalence of lethal mass violence. Criminology & Public Policy, 19(1), 17–35.
16.
DuweG.JohnsonB. R. (2025). New insights for “what works”? Religiosity and the risk-needs-responsivity model. Crime & Delinquency, 71(1), 118–143.
17.
EmilianC.Al-JuffaliN.FazelS. (2025). Prevalence of severe mental illness among people in prison across 43 countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Public Health, 10(2), e97–e110.
18.
GrahamA. K.CullenF. T.PickettJ. T.JonsonC. L. (2021). A new generation of survey research in criminology: Online opt-in surveys. The Criminologist, 46(6), 5.
19.
KockN.LynnG. S. (2012). Lateral collinearity and misleading results in variance-based SEM: An illustration and recommendations. Journal of the Association for information Systems, 13(7), 2.
20.
LankfordA.SilverJ. (2020). Why have public mass shootings become more deadly? Assessing how perpetrators’ motives and methods have changed over time. Criminology & Public Policy, 19(1), 37–60.
21.
LeeH.CullenF. T.BurtonA. L.BurtonJrV. S. (2022). Millennials as the future of corrections: A generational analysis of public policy opinions. Crime & Delinquency, 68(12), 2355–2392.
22.
LoweS. R.GaleaS. (2017). The mental health consequences of mass shootings. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 18(1), 62–82.
23.
MaloneyD.RomigD.ArmstrongT. (1988). The balanced approach to juvenile probation. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 39, 1.
24.
MarunaS. (2001). Making Good (Vol. 86). American Psychological Association.
25.
MearsD. P.PickettJ. T.ManciniC. (2015). Support for balanced juvenile justice: Assessing views about youth, rehabilitation, and punishment. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 31, 459–479.
26.
PattavinaA.LongJ. S.PetrichD. M. M.ByrneJ.CullenF. T.TaxmanF. S. (2024). Revisiting the effectiveness of HOPE/swift-certain-fair supervision programs: A meta-analytic review. Criminology & Public Policy, 23(1), 45–76.
27.
PickettJ. T. (2019). Public opinion and criminal justice policy: Theory and research. Annual Review of Criminology, 2, 405–428.
28.
PrinsS. J. (2014). Prevalence of mental illnesses in US state prisons: A systematic review. Psychiatric Services, 65(7), 862–872.
29.
PuddyH. N.BurtonA. L.JonsonC. L. (2024). Getting the facts straight: A survey experiment of crime and immigration attitudes. Crime & Delinquency. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.21428/cb6ab371.57a1a31b
30.
PyroozD. C.DensleyJ. A.PetersonJ. K. (2025). Direct exposure to mass shootings among US adults. JAMA Network Open, 8(3), e250283.
31.
PyroozD.DensleyJ.SanchezJ. (2024). Are online opt-in panels viable data sources on hard-to-reach populations? Population and relational inferences on gang membership in the United States (No. ser2g). Center for Open Science.
32.
RedfordL.RatliffK. A. (2018). Pride and punishment: Entitled people’s self-promoting values motivate hierarchy-restoring retribution. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48(3), 303–319.
33.
RocqueM.GerdesM.FoxJ. A.DuweG.ClarkM. (2022). Averting tragedy: An exploration of thwarted mass public shootings relative to completed attacks. Criminal Justice Review, 48(3), 277–299.
34.
RoseB.KuiperM. E.Reinders FolmerC.van RooijB. (2024). Can criminology sway the public? How empirical findings about deterrence affect public punishment preferences. Crime Science, 13(1), 1–17.
35.
SchuttenN. M.PickettJ. T.BurtonA. L.CullenF. T.JonsonC. L.BurtonV. S.Jr. (2022). Punishing rampage: Public opinion on sanctions for school shooters. Justice Quarterly, 39(2), 252–275.
36.
SilvaJ. R. (2021). A comparative analysis of foiled and completed mass shootings. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 46(2), 187–208.
37.
SilvaJ. R. (2022). Mass shooting outcomes: A comparison of completed, attempted, failed, and foiled incidents in America. Deviant Behavior, 43(12), 1487–1506.
38.
SilvaJ. R.CapellanJ. A. (2019). The media’s coverage of mass public shootings in America: Fifty years of newsworthiness. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 43(1), 77–97.
39.
SilvaJ. R.Greene-ColozziE. A. (2022). An exploratory study of failed mass shootings in America. Security Journal, 11, 367–399.
40.
SilverJ.SilvaJ. R. (2022). A sequence analysis of the behaviors and experiences of the deadliest public mass shooters. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(23–24), NP23468–NP23494.
41.
SilverJ. R.SilverE. (2017). Why are conservatives more punitive than liberals? A moral foundations approach. Law and Human Behavior, 41(3), 258.
42.
SkeemJ.MulveyE. (2020). What role does serious mental illness play in mass shootings, and how should we address it?Criminology & Public Policy, 19(1), 85–108.
43.
SlemakerA. (2023). Studying mass shooters’ words: Warning behavior prior to attacks. Journal of Threat Assessment and Management, 10(1), 1.
44.
SloasL. B.Atkin-PlunkC. A. (2019). Perceptions of balanced justice and rehabilitation for drug offenders. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 30(7), 990–1009.
45.
SloasL. B.LarreaM. (2021). Rethinking sanctioning for offenders with mental health issues: A balanced justice approach. American Journal of Criminal Justice. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-021-09620-1
46.
StataCorp. (2023). Stata Statistical Software: Release 18. StataCorp LLC.
47.
TaxmanF. S.CaudyM. S. (2015). Risk tells us who, but not what or how: Empirical assessment of the complexity of criminogenic needs to inform correctional programming. Criminology & Public Policy, 14(1), 71–103.
48.
ThieloA. J.GrahamA.CullenF. T. (2021). The opt-in internet survey. In BarnesJ. C.FordeD. R. (Eds.), The Encyclopedia of research methods in criminology and criminal justice (Vol. 1, pp. 274–279). Wiley.
49.
UhlA.PickettJ. T. (2024). The (in) stability of punishment preferences: Implications for empirical desert. The British Journal of Criminology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azae088
50.
WestS. J.ThomsonN. D. (2023). Exploring personal crises observed in mass shooters as targets for detection and intervention using psychometric network analysis. Psychology of Violence, 13(5), 415–424.
51.
WuS. (2023). Public opinion on compensating different types of wrongful convictions. State University of New York at Albany.
